No idea of MMER events, lol..... any chicks there?

How's 35mm F2D compared to 35mm F1.8G? y comparing F2D with F1.4 G? paiseh I don hav knowledge on 35mm F2D

Owh.... 35mm F1.8 cant fit on FX since it's a better lens compared to 35mm F2 rite??

This post has been edited by Kent3888: Jul 22 2010, 02:55 PM

Hey guys, the TAMRON SP AF17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di-II

VC n non VC version IQ got diff? juz reduce hand shake only?? worth to pay the extra hundreds?

Haaiz... Now I'm really in the midst of choosing btw 35mm F/1.8 or Straight get Tammy 17-50 F2.8 with VC >.< Dunno how well can the Tammy performs (mayb compared to Nikkor 17-55 F2.8 ED =p), n da IQ compared to a prime. Dunno worth to go da extra mile to a fix aperture zoom lens or juz get a prime.

How much pricier we r looking at? New Tammy is 1.7k, used I found is 1.3k, Sigma??

Celciuz, used Nikkor oso 3.8k ler bro...... can buy 3 piece!!

Waaa..... 2.9k? den I rather get Nikkor if I got that budget!! y so exp?? Tamron VC oso 1.7k only, so much diff btw Tamron n Sigma ke? both oso F2.8 with VC or OS!

Y sigma lens is really that superior over Tamron?? I mean the 17-50mm ones?? Anybody tried or read comments on them??

If the sigma 70-200 is near as Nikkors, who would get the Sigma?

---

Added on August 9, 2010, 5:35 pmLol.... Nano coat oso loose? Fluoride code waa....
the built in motor of Tamron oso screw drive? but sure faster den nikkor 18-55 VR rite? extra 1k to reach Sigma frm Tamron ler.... wonder who would go for that

This post has been edited by Kent3888: Aug 9 2010, 05:35 PM

Really arrr??? Slower den 18-55 mer? I felt kit lens already sloww kao kao, really like tortoise at night!! non VC better at night?? or juz get a prime 35mm? lol...

Haar.... really that bad?? near 2k lens loose to 500 bucks lens? Oni aperture advantage....? den really left me with 35mm prime 1.8

Arrghh.... do u guys comment on the VC or non VC version? VC version not improved mer? da diameter oso increased to 72mm frm 67 ma... still no diff?

Any comment comparing Sigma 30mm F1.4 and Nikkor 35mm f1.8? I heard sigma's 30mm not sharp at all at 1.4, they recommend to get nikkor instead?? I don wanna get 50mm coz too tight!! sure I will regret, unless goin FF soon, but not now....

I plan to get this F2.8 tammy is for low light usage, i.e pc fair lighting or worse! but u all say it hunts at low light.... means gotta discard this lens in da list....>.< better get a prime F1.8 since it's so

---

Added on August 9, 2010, 6:04 pmSometimes when u wanna fit more things into the picture, where there is limited space, I bet I will regret for taking 50mm. 35mm is more like an all rounder. If wanna take full body portrait with 50mm, need quite a wide space for it!! Need not to say those 70-200 like celciuz la...

This post has been edited by Kent3888: Aug 9 2010, 06:04 PM

Come come poison me.... no money in pocket cant b poisoned!! hahaa...
But Bokeh wise, I think 35mm n 50mm F1.8 not much diff rite.... not to compare F1.4G la

Can share how u pp the pics?
Nice composition you have there.... luv them

This post has been edited by Kent3888: Aug 10 2010, 10:48 AM

Thx alot for the guidance!! Really appreciate it.....

Hahaa..... I oso told that to gf when takin pics at pc fair, my fren ask me to take these pics to share with them as they can't make it to come pc fair

lol.... processing, my photoshop full version trial expired, haha... don hav camera now, oni use portable....


Waa... I oso wonder wat extreme angle do you mean? Can show some example ka?

Agreed.... lol, especially when ur gf/wife is beside u, den u dump her aside n go shoot other girls. It really hurts them la.... Anyway I juz spam 1 shot with jpeg

So hav you guys tried out the VC version vs the non VC version? any dramatic difference?