a system where the justice with correct mindset above all

Or either properly organized but yet corrupted corporation / government that controls all.

india prove recently the failure of greedy/capitalism

india actually proved why we should have capitalism

This post has been edited by +3kk!: Sep 28 2010, 09:58 AM

but man can't be controlled there

the problem of india is government intervention and beaurocracy, the government is corrupted and very very noisy

capitalism = anti government intervention.

go learn capitalism first before dissin it k

capitalism nvr can cope wit greed. History prove it

and i assume your history streteches very far back in human time eh

go learn your facts on capitalism

This Zeitgeist Movement sounds like modern day propaganda...

all this abstract things just to hide the creators delusion.

capitalism = control by rich ppl. means.. poor guy more poor, rich guy more rich. Like malaysia house hold. The damn rich ppl "fire" the house price like hell..small condo cost RM 300K. Then the poor guy cannot buy of it, if buy, how many years for the installment..30 years?? 50 years? then now the gorvernment start to control of it. So, how...if u r poor guy, how do u "shang wei" (naik level). married, relationship..or hardworking.

Communist= control by government. (if u r the " Di zhu" (rich guy), u sure want imigrate.) your properties not belong to u, but is "Ah Kong de" (public).- President Mao.

My view very simple....
rich ppl ( more like capitalism ) in the country, 10%.
Poor PPl ( more like communist) in the country, 90%.

Now aday, world population 6,852,472,823. rich & poor guy also need to eat. no matter how rich u r. at the end u also need to share your properties with the poor guy. while the poor guys gain the power of military, & production.

Future, economic mostly control by government. money currency r useless & will replace by the old ancient "GOLD".

"we paid our high value "oil" to exchange the worthless us dollar" - president Iran

hope u can get what i means. sorry for my bad English.

This post has been edited by peace230: Feb 8 2011, 05:05 PM

i am more likely to vote for a monarch instead, should he knows how to manage his land well and passes down his power to those who he saw worthy of ruling once he's about to embrace retirement.

well thats a form of capitalism as well. When the royal family is always on top and all others work their asses off to make sure that the monarch stays on top lol. Its still exploitation when you dont allow those whom are able to fully maximize their potential. Coz if there is a king, you cant have someone higher than the king.