QUOTE(ericccheong @ Oct 4 2011, 07:32 PM)
I can't quite agree that all foam is the same except if they all came from the same supplier. I would assume that the ingredients that different suppliers put in to make the foam would give them different properties.
What's true is that all are foam. All things will age - some gracefully, some not so - and maybe that would be the penultimate test. How will each product look like and perform in 3, 5 or 7 years' time? If all the foams live up to their name, they have everything to gain and everything for Autofoam to fight for.
Chassis foaming is still a young market with Autofoam being the undoubtable father-figure. As more competition crops up, time will only tell how their products stand up - and this is where Autofoam has the upper-hand. Where Autofoam loses in pricing, it gains in testimonials dating back years. Again, if the other brands live up to expectations, then Autofoam has some real competition on its hands which will be good for the market.
Some will place hard-earned cash in kl auto's coffers because of peace of mind from the years of testimonies. Others will place their trust in up-coming brands. Again, the scene is still young and the market is still open.
since you seem to be pro foaming, what are the benefits of foaming to layman? if foaming is as good as claimed, why ain't car manufacturers foaming their cars, especially the japs & local cars, makes it easy for them to bring their rides to conti std? $75 per bottle at retail, imagine at bulk price, easily $40. Compare this to millions in R&D.
Are chassis meant to be hollow? I never seen those american hotrod builders pumping foam into their chassis. What's wrong & who's right?