Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Autofoam Review
|
SUSMatrix
|
Jul 13 2011, 08:25 PM
|
|
QUOTE(clawhammer @ Jul 13 2011, 07:09 PM) I had my whole Honda Accord autofoam-ed before this, full package and on every single foamable spot  To be honest there are surely differences (nothing great) but the price we're paying is way too expensive (RM4K+). Since there are alternatives in the market these days, I will try other types of foam which is cheaper. I'm speaking from the perspective of value vs money spent  Wow. 4K spent and only a little difference???  ....i was thinking to do autofoam also...but after reading the feedback here, now have serious doubt. I think i just do some basic soundproofing elsewhere....
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSMatrix
|
Jul 16 2011, 12:30 AM
|
|
QUOTE(squareballs @ Jul 16 2011, 12:17 AM) It's been a year since i did Autofoam.. So how is it??? Still good?? btw, autofoam website is down? This post has been edited by Matrix: Jul 16 2011, 12:31 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSMatrix
|
Oct 5 2011, 09:38 AM
|
|
QUOTE(lunchtime @ Oct 4 2011, 11:11 PM) since you seem to be pro foaming, what are the benefits of foaming to layman? if foaming is as good as claimed, why ain't car manufacturers foaming their cars, especially the japs & local cars, makes it easy for them to bring their rides to conti std? $75 per bottle at retail, imagine at bulk price, easily $40. Compare this to millions in R&D. Are chassis meant to be hollow? I never seen those american hotrod builders pumping foam into their chassis. What's wrong & who's right? Yeah, if foaming is so good, surely the high-end cars like Benz, BMWs, Lexus etc...will have some foaming? Or do they? Anyone can share?
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSMatrix
|
Oct 5 2011, 05:08 PM
|
|
QUOTE(clawhammer @ Oct 5 2011, 04:28 PM) Total lost means insurance will pay you and no point repairing  But will insurance says you modified your car with dunno what, so cannot claim?? Insurance companies will find any excuse not to pay....
|
|
|
|
|