Such high clocks, CPU and RAM, yet your everest memory bench is terrible, why is that?
[Mini-OC Test] i5-665K ES and N465GTX, Re-bench with v1.21B Beta Bios
[Mini-OC Test] i5-665K ES and N465GTX, Re-bench with v1.21B Beta Bios
|
|
Jun 26 2010, 12:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
59 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
Such high clocks, CPU and RAM, yet your everest memory bench is terrible, why is that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 27 2010, 01:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
59 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Jun 26 2010, 12:45 AM) Huh, can you explain? Settings were 7-7-7-20 @ 800MHz for the 655k. With an 860 running at slower cpu clock and 7-7-7-20 @ 700MHz I can hit double the bandwidth of the 655k. Seems to me like the memory might be bottlenecked by the 655k. Maybe it's like this with Clarkdale. This post has been edited by Zibel: Jun 27 2010, 02:23 PM |
|
|
Jun 27 2010, 11:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
59 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
Hope a new BIOS helps. Thanks for the review.
|
|
|
Jul 19 2010, 09:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
59 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
Better but still not impressed with the Clarkdale RAM results. It's like the dual channel really doesn't seem to be doing much. I'm wondering if you took one stick out and ran single channel if the RAM bench results would be fairly close to the dual channel results.
Lynfield seems to do much better with the RAM, maybe they'll give you an 875k to compare. Nice review, and great pics. |
| Change to: | 0.0168sec
0.54
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 04:56 AM |