Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages  1 2 3 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 [Mini-OC Test] i5-665K ES and N465GTX, Re-bench with v1.21B Beta Bios

views
     
TSSanko
post Jun 24 2010, 07:29 AM, updated 16y ago

Noob
******
Senior Member
1,436 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


Overview
Last week i had the opportunity to play with some of the latest hardware in the PC Industry. I was given an engineering sample of Intel Core i5 665K ES cpu and a Nvidia 465GTX graphic card to play with. Due to my busy schedule, i was unable to provide full-length review on both the cpu and graphic card. So i decided to run some simple benchmarks targeted to OverClockers. As always, let the pictures to the talking.

UPDATE 17-07-2010
After looking at the benchmark scores i obtain were kinda slow, i sent a feedback to MSI Malaysia. And after discussing with their engineer in Taiwan, i was told that the official BIOS v1.1 used does not fully utilize Intel K-Model processors. Therefore i decided to use the Beta Bios for another round of re-bench. For this round of re-bench session, i tried out Super Pi 32M first on Windows XP SP3 environment followed by Everest Ultimate Cache and Memory Benchmak, 3DMark 06 and finally 3DMark Vantage on Windows 7 Ultimate 32bit environment.

Intel Core i5-665K Introduction
Recently Intel just released the K model processors with unlocked multiplier. Currently there are two LGA1156 models, Core i5-655K and Core i7-875K. No doubt that these K model processors are now the main interest in the OverClocking Community. OverClockers now do not need to spend large sum of money to purchase the Extreme Series processors to enjoy the fun of OverClocking an unlocked multiplier processor.

user posted image


Intel i5-655K Main Features
Clock Speed: 3.2GHz
Lithography: 32nm
Microarchitecture: Clarkdale
# of Cores: 2
# of Threads: 4
Cache: 4MB
Multiplier: 9 - unlimited
Max TDP: 73 W
Integrated Graphics: Yes
ISA: MMX, EMT64, AES, SSE-SSE4.2, VT-x

Nvidia 465GTX Graphic Card Introduction
Nvidia 465GTX Graphic Card is the third Nvidia card based on the 3+ billion-transistor GF100 GPU. Currently it is the lowest-end GeForce 400 Series card available in the market.

user posted image


Nvidia 465GTX Graphic Card Main Features
CUDA Cores: 352
Graphics Clock: 607 MHz
Processor Clock: 1215 MHz
Memory Clock: 1603 MHz
Memory Configuration: 1024MB GDDR5
Memory Interface Width: 256-bit
Microsoft DirectX: 11
Maximum Digital Resolution: 2560x1600
Maximum VGA Resolution: 2048x1536
Standard Display Connectors: Mini HDMI, 2 x Dual Link DVI
Height: 111 mm
Length: 241 mm
Width: Dual PCI-E Slots
Supplementary Power Connectors: 2 x 6-pin

This post has been edited by Sanko: Jul 17 2010, 04:17 AM
TSSanko
post Jun 24 2010, 07:30 AM

Noob
******
Senior Member
1,436 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


Testbed

Processor: Intel Core i5-665K ES
Mainboard: MSI Bing Bang Fuzion
Memory: Corsair XMS3 TR3X6G1600C7 (2GB x 2)
Graphic Card: MSI N465GTX Twin Frozr II
HDD: Western Digital 80GB Black Caviar
Power Supply: Antec CP-1000
Heatsink: Scythe Grand Kama Cross
Operation System: Windows 7 Professional 64bit

user posted image
Testbed view

user posted image
Getting all ready

user posted image
Full benching rig

TSSanko
post Jun 24 2010, 07:31 AM

Noob
******
Senior Member
1,436 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


Intel Core i5-655K
i5-655K is relatively easy to OverClock. With the unlimited multiplier option, BLCK is no longer an issue to higher cpu clockspeed. As for this test, my intention is just to hit 5.0GHz clockspeed and it was done within minutes. As my main priority is not on the memory, the ram is kept at the rated speed for all of the benchmarks done.

user posted image
i5-655K CPU

user posted image
i5-655K CPU Specification

user posted image
5.0GHz clockspeed screenshot

user posted image
5.0GHz clockspeed CPU-Z validation

user posted image
Everest Ultimate default clockspeed Cache and Memory Benchmark

user posted image
Everest Ultimate default clockspeed Cache and Memory Benchmark [BIOS v1.21B]

user posted image
Everest Ultimate 5.0GHz clockspeed Cache and Memory Benchmark

user posted image
Everest Ultimate 5.0GHz clockspeed Cache and Memory Benchmark [BIOS v1.21B]

user posted image
Everest Ultimate 5.0GHz/DDR31855 7-8-7-18 Cache and Memory Benchmark [BIOS v1.21B]

user posted image
Super Pi 32M - 4.8GHz/DDR31924 7-8-7-18 [BIOS v1.21B]


This post has been edited by Sanko: Jul 17 2010, 04:10 AM
TSSanko
post Jun 24 2010, 07:31 AM

Noob
******
Senior Member
1,436 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


MSI N465GTX Twin Frozr II
Since this is a OverClocking Test, i carried out the testing in a very simple methodology, stock-speed vs oc-speed. With the MSI Burner tool, i could adjust the Core Voltage. Therefore, i set a core voltage limit to obtain the highest core and memory speed of the card. The core voltage was set to 1075mV while CPU is set to 4.0GHz clockspeed.

user posted image
MSI N465GTX Twin Frozr II

user posted image
3DMark06 - Stock-speed on both the CPU and Graphic Card

user posted image
3DMark06 - CPU: 4.0GHz, Graphic Card: 865/1875/1730 MHz

user posted image
3DMark06 - CPU: 4.0GHz, Graphic Card: 865/1875/1730 MHz [BIOS v1.21B]

user posted image
3DMark06 - CPU: 4.5GHz, Graphic Card: 865/1875/1730 MHz [BIOS v1.21B]

user posted image
3DMark Vantage - Stock-speed on both the CPU and Graphic Card

user posted image
3DMark Vantage - CPU: 4.0GHz, Graphic Card: 865/1875/1730 MHz

user posted image
3DMark Vantage - CPU: 4.0GHz, Graphic Card: 865/1875/1730 MHz [BIOS v1.21B]

user posted image
3DMark Vantage - CPU: 4.5GHz, Graphic Card: 865/1875/1730 MHz [BIOS v1.21B]


This post has been edited by Sanko: Jul 17 2010, 04:13 AM
TSSanko
post Jun 24 2010, 07:32 AM

Noob
******
Senior Member
1,436 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


Conclusion
Intel i5-655K: It's yearning for Extreme OverClocking.
Nvidia N465GTX: Price is very close to ATI 5850 but the performance is not.

Special mention to MSI, Corsair, Antec and Intel

This post has been edited by Sanko: Jun 24 2010, 11:58 PM
TSSanko
post Jun 24 2010, 07:32 AM

Noob
******
Senior Member
1,436 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


- reserved -
TSSanko
post Jun 24 2010, 07:32 AM

Noob
******
Senior Member
1,436 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


- reserved -
TSSanko
post Jun 24 2010, 07:33 AM

Noob
******
Senior Member
1,436 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


- reserved -
sup3rfly
post Jun 24 2010, 04:34 PM

Techno Slave
******
Senior Member
1,561 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 秋葉原電気街


nice setup there and the rams u have there smile.gif

This post has been edited by sup3rfly: Jun 24 2010, 04:36 PM
shinjite
post Jun 24 2010, 04:42 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


Holy cow...straight away to 5Ghz....o.O"
BigSaver
post Jun 24 2010, 11:12 PM

v(^_^)V
******
Senior Member
1,029 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Earth


and the temperature would be?
TSSanko
post Jun 24 2010, 11:48 PM

Noob
******
Senior Member
1,436 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


sup3rfly: all normal rams, haih... none can do 2000mhz 7-7-7.

shinjite: it's kinda normal if you look around reviews on the net. most of the 655K proc is able to do that on air, 1.45v - 1.5v.

BigSaver: hrmm... as i'm only doing CPU Validation, i don't really care about the cpu temp if you are asking me. i only focus on the voltage needed for 5.0ghz. but according to bios H/W Monitor, it's around 40 degree, 1.47v with the Scythe Grand Kama Cross + 800 rpm fan. lol, this reminds me the only time i look at the temp is while doing stress test which was years ago. and which benching LN2 with coolice. my job is to 'LOOK AT THE THERMOMETER" and pouring the LN2.

This post has been edited by Sanko: Jun 24 2010, 11:51 PM
BigSaver
post Jun 25 2010, 12:40 AM

v(^_^)V
******
Senior Member
1,029 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Earth


nice i can say, 5ghz on air.like the i3 series.most can do around 4.Xghz close to 5ghz on air too.

btw the gtx 465 no chance to unleashed the "470"? brows.gif

This post has been edited by BigSaver: Jun 25 2010, 12:41 AM
sup3rfly
post Jun 25 2010, 09:09 AM

Techno Slave
******
Senior Member
1,561 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 秋葉原電気街


well the amount of mem is more than waht i got already tongue.gif
TSSanko
post Jun 25 2010, 06:18 PM

Noob
******
Senior Member
1,436 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


BigSaver: unfortunately nope. there's only one GPU chip which is able to flash to 470GTX.

sup3rfly: none is mine. lol.
Zibel
post Jun 26 2010, 12:32 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
59 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
Such high clocks, CPU and RAM, yet your everest memory bench is terrible, why is that?


OC4/3
post Jun 26 2010, 12:45 AM

.
Group Icon
Elite
4,746 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Speed rule


QUOTE(Zibel @ Jun 26 2010, 12:32 AM)
Such high clocks, CPU and RAM, yet your everest memory bench is terrible, why is that?
*
Ram setting is not optimized
@Sanko,hmm seem like GTX465 performance is a bit lower then what it should be blink.gif
TSSanko
post Jun 26 2010, 04:11 AM

Noob
******
Senior Member
1,436 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


OC4/3: ya, i did alot of testing on the VGA actually. i was wondering how come the score is so low. i checked reference in hwbot and couldn't come close to them even though the core and memory is almost the same. here is my findings.

1. PhysX is disabled.
2. Dual Core CPU.

But i have to admit that my FPS is really low compared to others. and to be honest i'm still looking for the answer. for CPU my test took me 1-2 hours only. while the vga took me 2-3 days.

I'm not quite sure is it the OS is giving me the problem. I reinstalled 3 times with the same thing. my Super Pi result is even worst. it hang 1 sec before the last loop. i'm going to test this rig again with XP environment and a new bios which will be released soon enough.
OC4/3
post Jun 26 2010, 02:41 PM

.
Group Icon
Elite
4,746 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Speed rule


QUOTE(Sanko @ Jun 26 2010, 04:11 AM)
OC4/3: ya, i did alot of testing on the VGA actually. i was wondering how come the score is so low. i checked reference in hwbot and couldn't come close to them even though the core and memory is almost the same. here is my findings.

1. PhysX is disabled.
2. Dual Core CPU.

But i have to admit that my FPS is really low compared to others. and to be honest i'm still looking for the answer. for CPU my test took me 1-2 hours only. while the vga took me 2-3 days.

I'm not quite sure is it the OS is giving me the problem. I reinstalled 3 times with the same thing. my Super Pi result is even worst. it hang 1 sec before the last loop. i'm going to test this rig again with XP environment and a new bios which will be released soon enough.
*
Cause i was comparing to my own pc which is a E8600@4.2ghz and GTX260@SOC Default clock,score is 17.6k



Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
SkyNoEye
post Jun 26 2010, 03:35 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
18 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: Setapak, KL


- wrong post -

This post has been edited by SkyNoEye: Jun 26 2010, 03:36 PM

3 Pages  1 2 3 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0222sec    1.10    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 12:03 PM