Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 [Mini-OC Test] i5-665K ES and N465GTX, Re-bench with v1.21B Beta Bios

views
     
OC4/3
post Jun 26 2010, 12:45 AM

.
Group Icon
Elite
4,746 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Speed rule


QUOTE(Zibel @ Jun 26 2010, 12:32 AM)
Such high clocks, CPU and RAM, yet your everest memory bench is terrible, why is that?
*
Ram setting is not optimized
@Sanko,hmm seem like GTX465 performance is a bit lower then what it should be blink.gif
OC4/3
post Jun 26 2010, 02:41 PM

.
Group Icon
Elite
4,746 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Speed rule


QUOTE(Sanko @ Jun 26 2010, 04:11 AM)
OC4/3: ya, i did alot of testing on the VGA actually. i was wondering how come the score is so low. i checked reference in hwbot and couldn't come close to them even though the core and memory is almost the same. here is my findings.

1. PhysX is disabled.
2. Dual Core CPU.

But i have to admit that my FPS is really low compared to others. and to be honest i'm still looking for the answer. for CPU my test took me 1-2 hours only. while the vga took me 2-3 days.

I'm not quite sure is it the OS is giving me the problem. I reinstalled 3 times with the same thing. my Super Pi result is even worst. it hang 1 sec before the last loop. i'm going to test this rig again with XP environment and a new bios which will be released soon enough.
*
Cause i was comparing to my own pc which is a E8600@4.2ghz and GTX260@SOC Default clock,score is 17.6k



Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
OC4/3
post Jun 27 2010, 11:44 PM

.
Group Icon
Elite
4,746 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Speed rule


QUOTE(Sanko @ Jun 26 2010, 03:36 PM)
OC4/3: thanks for your insight. PhysX is enable for your score?

i'll re-run the 3ds tonight. during my test although cpu-z is detecting the speed as 4.0GHz, but futuremark 3dmark06 is detecting it as 3.8Ghz if you see the ss. in 3dmark06, higher cpu frequency will result in higher SM2.0 and SM3.0 score.

my testing also shows that 3dmark06 couldn't read multi beyond 24. while comparing your result to mine, both using 2 dual core but mine is around 3.8GHz while yours is 4.2Ghz. however if judging from the comparison between the 2 cards, 465GTX should be the winner in quite a margin. so the physx and cpu definitely won't be the main issue here.

PS: lol, used my housemate ID. using P1 package only allows 1 user. sigh.....
*
AFAIK,physx does not affect 3dmark06 result smile.gif
I don't really know what wrong but give it a shot with windows xp,hmmmm
OC4/3
post Jul 17 2010, 07:28 PM

.
Group Icon
Elite
4,746 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Speed rule


Now this result is more in line with expectation rclxms.gif

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0135sec    0.70    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 04:57 AM