Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
125 Pages « < 119 120 121 122 123 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Random Car Thread V7

views
     
animaniac92
post Jun 5 2012, 01:56 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
46 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


@kadajawi, thanks man! smile.gif

Have some Audi R8.

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image


danny_sp15
post Jun 5 2012, 02:25 AM

==============
*******
Senior Member
3,045 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Canterlot


QUOTE(animaniac92 @ Jun 5 2012, 01:56 AM)
@kadajawi, thanks man! smile.gif

Have some Audi R8.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
damn bro, u're getting better and better with ur photography skills. really nice pics!! thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
animaniac92
post Jun 5 2012, 10:38 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
46 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


@danny_sp15, woah bro long time no see haha! Thanks man, but all pics of course, with a little photoshop touch up.
JasonWilton
post Jun 5 2012, 02:09 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
From: Malaysia


any other pictures of the carbon fiber panel on the side of the R8?
stunning pictures man, love the red nod.gif

user posted image
animaniac92
post Jun 5 2012, 10:49 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
46 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


@JasonWilton, heh, only one picture of it. Thanks man smile.gif

user posted image
kadajawi
post Jun 6 2012, 02:39 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
544 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


Great car and photos smile.gif

The 550D... if you want to shoot video, yes. But I have had to work on photos of the 550D, and I thought I was editing photos of a point & shoot (ok, it's not _that_ bad, but I was kind of shocked at the amount of noise at ISO 100. My camera can't even shoot 100...). It seems to me as if they crammed too many pixels onto such a small sensor (Canon sensors are smaller than the rest, unless you shoot with one of the 5D or 1D variants, and except for Panasonic and Olympus). Also I really don't like the way the 3 and 4 digit Canons feel like. To me Canon gets interesting from the 2 digit models onwards, i.e. 60D, 7D, 5D and 1D.

Consider the entry level Nikons (D3100 probably, perhaps D5100). 2 of my friends shoot Nikon and they seem happy. The Pentax K-x, K-r and the just launched K-30 (more of a 60D competitor, with some features from the 7D) are also very tempting cameras. Pentax probably makes the most sense for serious amateurs. The automatic functions may not be as good as with Canon and Nikon, but the controls are better thought out (the important dials and buttons are where my fingers are, the viewfinder is usually better than elsewhere, you can use lenses that were built 40 years ago... without adapter. With even older ones are possible. The viewfinder screen on the K-30 and above can be easily replaced to assist in manual focusing, and old lenses just feel great. More solid, smoother, I like them).

That is if you don't care so much about video. If you do, then Canon is pretty much the way to go (unless you are looking at something like the D800 from Nikon, I believe that one has an uncompressed HDMI output which is something pros are craving for). Or if you already have Canon lenses (father, son, ...) that can be used on a Canon DSLR. Or if you crave for some of the lenses you can only get from Canon and perhaps Nikon, but then again those are usually extremely expensive, so I doubt it.

(To me Canon is a bit like Toyota. Overrated and overpriced, although the products are obviously good. But others offer so much more. I do love their point & shoots though. Great great great little cameras, I have 2 of them and my mother has one).

Oh my. Now I sound like a total d***, posting awful photos and talking like a pro. Anyway, all I wanted to say was check out what the others have to offer, before going for what everyone else has.
raclette
post Jun 6 2012, 03:22 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
428 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
hmm.gif
TSericmaxman
post Jun 6 2012, 08:27 AM

-
*******
Senior Member
7,951 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
Photography section -> http://forum.lowyat.net/PhotographyDigitalImaging&Video

laugh.gif
JasonWilton
post Jun 7 2012, 12:09 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(kadajawi @ Jun 6 2012, 02:39 AM)
Great car and photos smile.gif

The 550D... if you want to shoot video, yes. But I have had to work on photos of the 550D, and I thought I was editing photos of a point & shoot (ok, it's not _that_ bad, but I was kind of shocked at the amount of noise at ISO 100. My camera can't even shoot 100...). It seems to me as if they crammed too many pixels onto such a small sensor (Canon sensors are smaller than the rest, unless you shoot with one of the 5D or 1D variants, and except for Panasonic and Olympus). Also I really don't like the way the 3 and 4 digit Canons feel like. To me Canon gets interesting from the 2 digit models onwards, i.e. 60D, 7D, 5D and 1D.

Consider the entry level Nikons (D3100 probably, perhaps D5100). 2 of my friends shoot Nikon and they seem happy. The Pentax K-x, K-r and the just launched K-30 (more of a 60D competitor, with some features from the 7D) are also very tempting cameras. Pentax probably makes the most sense for serious amateurs. The automatic functions may not be as good as with Canon and Nikon, but the controls are better thought out (the important dials and buttons are where my fingers are, the viewfinder is usually better than elsewhere, you can use lenses that were built 40 years ago... without adapter. With even older ones are possible. The viewfinder screen on the K-30 and above can be easily replaced to assist in manual focusing, and old lenses just feel great. More solid, smoother, I like them).

That is if you don't care so much about video. If you do, then Canon is pretty much the way to go (unless you are looking at something like the D800 from Nikon, I believe that one has an uncompressed HDMI output which is something pros are craving for). Or if you already have Canon lenses (father, son, ...) that can be used on a Canon DSLR. Or if you crave for some of the lenses you can only get from Canon and perhaps Nikon, but then again those are usually extremely expensive, so I doubt it.

(To me Canon is a bit like Toyota. Overrated and overpriced, although the products are obviously good. But others offer so much more. I do love their point & shoots though. Great great great little cameras, I have 2 of them and my mother has one).

Oh my. Now I sound like a total d***, posting awful photos and talking like a pro. Anyway, all I wanted to say was check out what the others have to offer, before going for what everyone else has.
*
so you're saying you have used the 550d several times?
if i were to give you a rating of 5 stars, how many stars would it get?

and about the "but I was kind of shocked at the amount of noise at ISO 100. My camera can't even shoot 100..." you're talking about your current camera or the 550D?
yeah I am really into videos to be frank (low lighting conditions to be more specific)

by the way thanks for the advice and all, actually its still a few months away to have myself have possession of any DSLR rclxub.gif

This post has been edited by JasonWilton: Jun 7 2012, 12:10 AM
raclette
post Jun 7 2012, 12:17 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
428 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
There s this wonderful thing called PM u know.
V12Kompressor
post Jun 7 2012, 12:27 AM

No carrots here
*******
Senior Member
2,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Muddy Banks


I thought apa kereta ada 5.5L Diesel engine and my pants is starting to get wet and then suddenly I see the word Canon. My pants is as dry as Kalahari Desert now.
magnate
post Jun 7 2012, 12:28 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
89 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(kadajawi @ Jun 6 2012, 02:39 AM)
Great car and photos smile.gif

The 550D... if you want to shoot video, yes. But I have had to work on photos of the 550D, and I thought I was editing photos of a point & shoot (ok, it's not _that_ bad, but I was kind of shocked at the amount of noise at ISO 100. My camera can't even shoot 100...). It seems to me as if they crammed too many pixels onto such a small sensor (Canon sensors are smaller than the rest, unless you shoot with one of the 5D or 1D variants, and except for Panasonic and Olympus). Also I really don't like the way the 3 and 4 digit Canons feel like. To me Canon gets interesting from the 2 digit models onwards, i.e. 60D, 7D, 5D and 1D.

Consider the entry level Nikons (D3100 probably, perhaps D5100). 2 of my friends shoot Nikon and they seem happy. The Pentax K-x, K-r and the just launched K-30 (more of a 60D competitor, with some features from the 7D) are also very tempting cameras. Pentax probably makes the most sense for serious amateurs. The automatic functions may not be as good as with Canon and Nikon, but the controls are better thought out (the important dials and buttons are where my fingers are, the viewfinder is usually better than elsewhere, you can use lenses that were built 40 years ago... without adapter. With even older ones are possible. The viewfinder screen on the K-30 and above can be easily replaced to assist in manual focusing, and old lenses just feel great. More solid, smoother, I like them).

That is if you don't care so much about video. If you do, then Canon is pretty much the way to go (unless you are looking at something like the D800 from Nikon, I believe that one has an uncompressed HDMI output which is something pros are craving for). Or if you already have Canon lenses (father, son, ...) that can be used on a Canon DSLR. Or if you crave for some of the lenses you can only get from Canon and perhaps Nikon, but then again those are usually extremely expensive, so I doubt it.

(To me Canon is a bit like Toyota. Overrated and overpriced, although the products are obviously good. But others offer so much more. I do love their point & shoots though. Great great great little cameras, I have 2 of them and my mother has one).

Oh my. Now I sound like a total d***, posting awful photos and talking like a pro. Anyway, all I wanted to say was check out what the others have to offer, before going for what everyone else has.
*
OFF TOPIC!!

This post has been edited by magnate: Jun 7 2012, 12:28 AM
Shawnzz
post Jun 7 2012, 12:34 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,911 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Ang Mo Kio, Singapore


QUOTE(kadajawi @ Jun 6 2012, 02:39 AM)
Great car and photos smile.gif

The 550D... if you want to shoot video, yes. But I have had to work on photos of the 550D, and I thought I was editing photos of a point & shoot (ok, it's not _that_ bad, but I was kind of shocked at the amount of noise at ISO 100. My camera can't even shoot 100...). It seems to me as if they crammed too many pixels onto such a small sensor (Canon sensors are smaller than the rest, unless you shoot with one of the 5D or 1D variants, and except for Panasonic and Olympus). Also I really don't like the way the 3 and 4 digit Canons feel like. To me Canon gets interesting from the 2 digit models onwards, i.e. 60D, 7D, 5D and 1D.

Consider the entry level Nikons (D3100 probably, perhaps D5100). 2 of my friends shoot Nikon and they seem happy. The Pentax K-x, K-r and the just launched K-30 (more of a 60D competitor, with some features from the 7D) are also very tempting cameras. Pentax probably makes the most sense for serious amateurs. The automatic functions may not be as good as with Canon and Nikon, but the controls are better thought out (the important dials and buttons are where my fingers are, the viewfinder is usually better than elsewhere, you can use lenses that were built 40 years ago... without adapter. With even older ones are possible. The viewfinder screen on the K-30 and above can be easily replaced to assist in manual focusing, and old lenses just feel great. More solid, smoother, I like them).

That is if you don't care so much about video. If you do, then Canon is pretty much the way to go (unless you are looking at something like the D800 from Nikon, I believe that one has an uncompressed HDMI output which is something pros are craving for). Or if you already have Canon lenses (father, son, ...) that can be used on a Canon DSLR. Or if you crave for some of the lenses you can only get from Canon and perhaps Nikon, but then again those are usually extremely expensive, so I doubt it.

(To me Canon is a bit like Toyota. Overrated and overpriced, although the products are obviously good. But others offer so much more. I do love their point & shoots though. Great great great little cameras, I have 2 of them and my mother has one).

Oh my. Now I sound like a total d***, posting awful photos and talking like a pro. Anyway, all I wanted to say was check out what the others have to offer, before going for what everyone else has.
*
use user posted image
JasonWilton
post Jun 7 2012, 08:35 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
From: Malaysia


hahahahah im sorry guys, really forgot about it drool.gif

okay okay on topic,

user posted image'

user posted image

the first pic is actually taken from my really old phone flex.gif

This post has been edited by JasonWilton: Jun 7 2012, 08:37 AM
r3kahsttub
post Jun 7 2012, 10:06 AM

IG: @MTHRFKNWIN
*******
Senior Member
2,278 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
user posted image

Sorry, handphone pic only.
TSericmaxman
post Jun 7 2012, 10:38 AM

-
*******
Senior Member
7,951 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
i died.
kadajawi
post Jun 7 2012, 11:18 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
544 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


Mh... Veyron. smile.gif Not such a fan of the colors though. I think I should have one too... mhh...

(Ps: No need to fully quote my off topic ramblings tongue.gif ).
r3kahsttub
post Jun 7 2012, 11:25 AM

IG: @MTHRFKNWIN
*******
Senior Member
2,278 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
I just realized the last time I saw this car was a year ago:

user posted image

mingyuyu
post Jun 7 2012, 11:52 AM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(r3kahsttub @ Jun 7 2012, 11:25 AM)
I just realized the last time I saw this car was a year ago:

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Sultan Johor's ride?
magnate
post Jun 7 2012, 12:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
89 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
Maybe He come to take delivery His special order Proton that will use WWW 1

125 Pages « < 119 120 121 122 123 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0290sec    0.27    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 11:42 PM