|
1. You are comparing amateur and professional army.
2. Chaotic situation and sound distruption. With so much going on up front, explosion, being near a moving tank which I am sure produce a fair amount of noise on its own and also tons of gun firing sounds all around them, I doubt one will hear two people brawling behind them when their focus are up front. I am pretty sure even the pro FPS players can't see everything when playing the game, that's why they use voice communcation. Same can be applied to real life situation.
3. Tunnel vision. Your attention is likely to get drawn by the biggest threat you are facing at a certain time. Even in game, with the help of UI, I can't see everything that is happening at once and when I am under attacked(be it FPS or RTS), I am focusing more on whatever or whoever that is attacking me at that moment. That's only in a game, where I am in no danger. One real-life situation I can share is my experience in paintball game. When I see someone shooting me and is positioned in front of me, I am going to locked my vision on him, ignoring whatever sounds or movement that is on the other side of the battlefield. Granted I am pretty new to this whole paintball thing, I am pretty sure I have similar situation as an "amateur" of this specific case.
4. The only way you can really be complete control of a situation is when you are playing turn-based game. Where you can see everything that is happening in that area and you have all the time in the world to think about your next move. It ain't that easy in real time situation, especially when your life is at stack.
5. Let's judge the situation from one of the attack's POV then, because he/she doesn't have the metagame-god-view that we(the audience) have. To re-run the situation from the POV, they shoot at Rick, they hit Rick, with the fences and the distance, they are not going to see where Rick is hit. They see Rick falls behind the bus, they are not sure if he's dead or alive. Of course, if they keep their focus on Rick, they can see him pulling his leg toward the direction of the bus(from a second viewing, I am not sure if they can see it but let's go with they can see for the sake of argument), indicate that he's alive BUT when he's struggling behind the bus, the others are already firing at them and it's natural and logical that they are going to focus on the many threats that can take their life in any second and not focus on a might-be-dead man's leg. By that time, they are likely going to focus on the front and trying to stay behind the tank, they are less likely to remember to check behind the bus. We know Rick is behind the bus and alive because we have the view to see that, the attackers don't.
5(b). Another point about the POV thing. Even the best players of a team sport like basketball and football make mistake or the wrong decision all the time. We as fan can see the entire field so we can see how wrong their decision is but they obviously think it's the best decision on their (limited) vision so they chose to do that play. In basketball, sometime a player will just shoot even when his teammates are open. Sure, sometime it's selfishness but sometime he just doesn't see the field good enough to spot that pass, especially under the pressure of the defender. Bring the same situation in a battlefield, when the soldiers are under fire, they are not going to always do the right thing. Even the best of the best can make mistake at their playground, I am sure a freshman on the battlefield isn't able to process so much.
6. Rick waited for the group to start go even further forward before he jumps out toward the governor. If the governor screams enough, his group might hear him but he didn't.
7. They even forgot about Michonne when Rick's side started to fire at them. They should have just killed her if they are being experienced, calm and calculating at that moment.
8. I am not even sure if professional army can think well in a real conflict. You might see the tough bad-ass type of character in regular action movie, who can take out 100 soldiers on their own and has no problem counter-ambush their opponents because that's action movie, people want to see badass kicking other asses. Look at the more realistic war movies like Saving Private Ryan, who the soldiers are just soldiers instead of "hero" and you can see even trained man can panic and not do the right decision in a battle.
9. While your last post is obviously sarcasm(and so is the post before that), I am going to say that your plan might work to a certain degree even in real conflict. The real problem is finding someone to take that position. Say you are one of the 20 soldiers expecting a warband of 40 coming your way and your commander would like one volunteer to be on that backstabbing position, I doubt you are going to volunteer yourself or the other 19 would be. I don't believe anyone is going to put themselves in the most dangerous position ever, they are going to choose to stay back under far cover for sure. Sure, you might talk a tough game now or think you could do welll but when you are out there, you are going to think differently. There's a reason why internet has more warriors than real life because it's so much easier to talk big(or think big) than to actually do it. The lesbian(not the tough one) pretty much represents this, she talks a lot and seems confident when the real conflict comes, she is encroached by fear and can't even do crap out there.
This post has been edited by Goliath764: Dec 10 2013, 10:06 AM
|