Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
LRT track near homes can decrease value?
|
newbi3s
|
May 18 2010, 09:51 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ May 18 2010, 09:48 PM) 24 hours LRT? Impossible  If it implement lah. But I wish they do. KL is 24 hours city. Many people work night shift too. If they really want to achieve higher target of percentage of public transport usage and recommend people to take public transport at the same time impose road congestion charges. They have to make it 24 hours in order to achieve the target.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSKampung2005
|
May 18 2010, 09:53 PM
|
Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
|
QUOTE(newbi3s @ May 18 2010, 09:51 PM) If it implement lah. But I wish they do. KL is 24 hours city. Many people work night shift too. If they really want to achieve higher target of percentage of public transport usage and recommend people to take public transport at the same time impose road congestion charges. They have to make it 24 hours in order to achieve the target. Not needed, even in Japan, they don't do this. You need a downtime for maintenance as well. What i suggest is late night bus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omage007
|
May 18 2010, 09:54 PM
|
|
QUOTE(newbi3s @ May 18 2010, 09:51 PM) If it implement lah. But I wish they do. KL is 24 hours city. Many people work night shift too. If they really want to achieve higher target of percentage of public transport usage and recommend people to take public transport at the same time impose road congestion charges. They have to make it 24 hours in order to achieve the target. Hello, at night no traffic jam problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
mypetridish
|
May 18 2010, 09:54 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ May 17 2010, 11:20 PM) Tunneling is ideal, but like you say, cost in prohibitive. What's more...tunneling in suburban area is unheard practice, whereby in my opinion, the density of suburban area is not conducive to repay the cost of tunneling. Even in proposed Kota Damansara-Cheras line, tunneling is only for areas inside KL, because acquiring land in prime areas will be too prohibitive in cost. So in Malaysia one does not need to acquire the rights to the land to perform tunneling activities under it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
newbi3s
|
May 18 2010, 09:55 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ May 18 2010, 09:53 PM) Not needed, even in Japan, they don't do this. You need a downtime for maintenance as well. What i suggest is late night bus. Bus is good idea. But many people not prefer to take bus. They prefer direct from train instead. Example? Very clear already.
|
|
|
|
|
|
yumyum77
|
May 18 2010, 09:55 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(t3chn0m4nc3r @ May 18 2010, 09:38 AM) Mentari court value low but Ridzuan and Suria Mas high...  They are different class la... mentari court look also like flats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
owenwong84
|
May 18 2010, 10:00 PM
|
|
QUOTE(newbi3s @ May 18 2010, 09:51 PM) If it implement lah. But I wish they do. KL is 24 hours city. Many people work night shift too. If they really want to achieve higher target of percentage of public transport usage and recommend people to take public transport at the same time impose road congestion charges. They have to make it 24 hours in order to achieve the target. well, by taxi... any ot after working hour, mostly employer will pay. If working shift i dunno. But in malaysia taxi terrible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pgsiemkia
|
May 18 2010, 10:16 PM
|
|
If behind house like in Taman Bahagia, ss2...homes no value..
|
|
|
|
|
|
newbi3s
|
May 18 2010, 10:30 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Omage007 @ May 18 2010, 09:54 PM) Hello, at night no traffic jam problem. If petrol increase. Toll increase. Tax increase. Because government really keen to promote public transport and reduce carbon emission. That's what they have to do... or else same like now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSKampung2005
|
May 18 2010, 10:39 PM
|
Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
|
QUOTE(newbi3s @ May 18 2010, 10:30 PM) If petrol increase. Toll increase. Tax increase. Because government really keen to promote public transport and reduce carbon emission. That's what they have to do... or else same like now.  Is it economical to run LRT line at midnight considering the ridership is so low? Manila started to run 24 hour operation to cater call centre workers, but it was cancelled because the ridership is too low.
|
|
|
|
|
|
newbi3s
|
May 18 2010, 10:52 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ May 18 2010, 10:39 PM) Is it economical to run LRT line at midnight considering the ridership is so low? Manila started to run 24 hour operation to cater call centre workers, but it was cancelled because the ridership is too low. In term of profit. It's not good. But in term of infrastructure will be great.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSKampung2005
|
May 18 2010, 10:55 PM
|
Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
|
QUOTE(newbi3s @ May 18 2010, 10:52 PM) In term of profit. It's not good. But in term of infrastructure will be great. Erm....late night bus is still better. At least they provide a choice, up to people want to take or not
|
|
|
|
|
|
spacelion
|
May 18 2010, 10:55 PM
|
|
QUOTE(newbi3s @ May 18 2010, 09:55 PM) Bus is good idea. But many people not prefer to take bus. They prefer direct from train instead. Example? Very clear already. bus is faster if no traffic jam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
akagidemon
|
May 19 2010, 11:36 AM
|
|
late night bus are better option since we can increase or decrease the amount of busses use depending on the occasions.
and making special night pss for those who frequent them and giving them discounts or any other incentives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSKampung2005
|
May 19 2010, 11:40 AM
|
Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
|
QUOTE(akagidemon @ May 19 2010, 11:36 AM) late night bus are better option since we can increase or decrease the amount of busses use depending on the occasions. and making special night pss for those who frequent them and giving them discounts or any other incentives. Correct. I think not only flexible, but also in the first place, late night buses are economical because you don't need many buses at that time.
|
|
|
|
|