Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> LRT track near homes can decrease value?

views
     
newbi3s
post May 18 2010, 09:51 PM

FALIQ
*******
Senior Member
4,325 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Putra Heights, Selangor DE



QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ May 18 2010, 09:48 PM)
24 hours LRT? Impossible  laugh.gif
*
If it implement lah. But I wish they do. KL is 24 hours city. Many people work night shift too. If they really want to achieve higher target of percentage of public transport usage and recommend people to take public transport at the same time impose road congestion charges. They have to make it 24 hours in order to achieve the target.
TSKampung2005
post May 18 2010, 09:53 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(newbi3s @ May 18 2010, 09:51 PM)
If it implement lah. But I wish they do. KL is 24 hours city. Many people work night shift too. If they really want to achieve higher target of percentage of public transport usage and recommend people to take public transport at the same time impose road congestion charges. They have to make it 24 hours in order to achieve the target.
*
Not needed, even in Japan, they don't do this.

You need a downtime for maintenance as well.

What i suggest is late night bus.
Omage007
post May 18 2010, 09:54 PM

Warn : 95%
*******
Senior Member
3,009 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Between Penang & KL Joined : November 2009
QUOTE(newbi3s @ May 18 2010, 09:51 PM)
If it implement lah. But I wish they do. KL is 24 hours city. Many people work night shift too. If they really want to achieve higher target of percentage of public transport usage and recommend people to take public transport at the same time impose road congestion charges. They have to make it 24 hours in order to achieve the target.
*
Hello, at night no traffic jam problem.
mypetridish
post May 18 2010, 09:54 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,313 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ May 17 2010, 11:20 PM)
Tunneling is ideal, but like you say, cost in prohibitive.

What's more...tunneling in suburban area is unheard practice, whereby in my opinion, the density of suburban area is not conducive to repay the cost of tunneling.

Even in proposed Kota Damansara-Cheras line, tunneling is only for areas inside KL, because acquiring land in prime areas will be too prohibitive in cost.
*
So in Malaysia one does not need to acquire the rights to the land to perform tunneling activities under it?
newbi3s
post May 18 2010, 09:55 PM

FALIQ
*******
Senior Member
4,325 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Putra Heights, Selangor DE



QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ May 18 2010, 09:53 PM)
Not needed, even in Japan, they don't do this.

You need a downtime for maintenance as well.

What i suggest is late night bus.
*
Bus is good idea. But many people not prefer to take bus. They prefer direct from train instead. Example? Very clear already.
yumyum77
post May 18 2010, 09:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
274 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Kappa

QUOTE(t3chn0m4nc3r @ May 18 2010, 09:38 AM)
Mentari court value low but Ridzuan and Suria Mas high... brows.gif
*
They are different class la... mentari court look also like flats. laugh.gif
owenwong84
post May 18 2010, 10:00 PM

Zin zin
******
Senior Member
1,041 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
QUOTE(newbi3s @ May 18 2010, 09:51 PM)
If it implement lah. But I wish they do. KL is 24 hours city. Many people work night shift too. If they really want to achieve higher target of percentage of public transport usage and recommend people to take public transport at the same time impose road congestion charges. They have to make it 24 hours in order to achieve the target.
*
well, by taxi... any ot after working hour, mostly employer will pay. If working shift i dunno.
But in malaysia taxi terrible.


pgsiemkia
post May 18 2010, 10:16 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
473 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
From: Timbuktoo
If behind house like in Taman Bahagia, ss2...homes no value..
newbi3s
post May 18 2010, 10:30 PM

FALIQ
*******
Senior Member
4,325 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Putra Heights, Selangor DE



QUOTE(Omage007 @ May 18 2010, 09:54 PM)
Hello, at night no traffic jam problem.
*
If petrol increase. Toll increase. Tax increase. Because government really keen to promote public transport and reduce carbon emission. That's what they have to do... or else same like now. rclxms.gif
TSKampung2005
post May 18 2010, 10:39 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(newbi3s @ May 18 2010, 10:30 PM)
If petrol increase. Toll increase. Tax increase. Because government really keen to promote public transport and reduce carbon emission. That's what they have to do... or else same like now.  rclxms.gif
*
Is it economical to run LRT line at midnight considering the ridership is so low?

Manila started to run 24 hour operation to cater call centre workers, but it was cancelled because the ridership is too low.


newbi3s
post May 18 2010, 10:52 PM

FALIQ
*******
Senior Member
4,325 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Putra Heights, Selangor DE



QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ May 18 2010, 10:39 PM)
Is it economical to run LRT line at midnight considering the ridership is so low?

Manila started to run 24 hour operation to cater call centre workers, but it was cancelled because the ridership is too low.
*
In term of profit. It's not good. But in term of infrastructure will be great.
TSKampung2005
post May 18 2010, 10:55 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(newbi3s @ May 18 2010, 10:52 PM)
In term of profit. It's not good. But in term of infrastructure will be great.
*
Erm....late night bus is still better.

At least they provide a choice, up to people want to take or not laugh.gif
spacelion
post May 18 2010, 10:55 PM

Ada Liu
******
Senior Member
1,692 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Probation?
QUOTE(newbi3s @ May 18 2010, 09:55 PM)
Bus is good idea. But many people not prefer to take bus. They prefer direct from train instead. Example? Very clear already.
*
bus is faster if no traffic jam.
akagidemon
post May 19 2010, 11:36 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
453 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Between Reality and Fantasy


late night bus are better option since we can increase or decrease the amount of busses use depending on the occasions.

and making special night pss for those who frequent them and giving them discounts or any other incentives.
TSKampung2005
post May 19 2010, 11:40 AM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(akagidemon @ May 19 2010, 11:36 AM)
late night bus are better option since we can increase or decrease the amount of busses use depending on the occasions.

and making special night pss for those who frequent them and giving them discounts or any other incentives.
*
Correct.

I think not only flexible, but also in the first place, late night buses are economical because you don't need many buses at that time. wink.gif

4 Pages « < 2 3 4
Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0162sec    0.69    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 12:27 PM