^ just try one by one then...
if lazy then u try the setting used on D90 thread 1st page...

Looks better, more acceptable this time . Most people tend to overcook their HDR anyways thanks to Photomatix.

---

Added on May 22, 2010, 8:23 amAnother question is, is the photoshooting on or not? Hmm? Today right?

photomatix tends to overdo the HDR, especially if you use light mode. i think you used light mode 'high' for the first 2 pics, this one is better but maybe you can try using dynamic-photo hdr. i find it easier to use and doesn't overdo the HDR.

no nid to regret...u can always send to nikon center to check what wrong with ur D3k...anyway,since it only u have that kind of problem,it make me wonder how u use ur dslr..maybe is the way u use caused the problem...just maybe lah...

@ ongdandy
Wow, that error is kinda weird lol, as everyone said, send back to Nikon ans see what they say.
I don't have this problem so far with my D3k. 

Looks like there is a HDR fever going on here lol

u sure u checked D90 latest price? coz D90 is actually quite cheap now, abt rm3.3k
but if reli u cant afford d rm3.3k then no choice la, haha

for your info, D5000 is using same sensor as D90, so D5000 image quality is closlely similar to D90
which means way better than D3000
D5000 only lack of the body AF motor, top LCD, n built in wireless flash commander in D90
as for AF, D3000 n D5000 shud be similar if u meant the kitlens, as the AF speed is based on the lens AF motor speed
not related to body
n for battery life, i dunno how much lifespan u want, but any DSLR battery life is way much longer lasting than any compact cam, it shudn be a problm
my D5000 can take up to 600-800 pics depending on u use flash or not

so D5000 is the choice all d way, plus u've tried D90 i bet that D3000 wont be up to your expectations
(not say that D3000 lousy, sory D3000 users )
u can afford D5000, go for it, around rm2.5k
if cant then cheaper D3000 is your choice
but sure plenty ppl will advise u go for D90, do it if u can wrestle out that extra cash

D80 oso got 
oh u   
wat im trying to say is if he's expecting D3000 performance close to D90 he'll be greatly disappointed
thats y i said sory if i sounded harsh, jz comparing, not saying D3000 is crap
if ppl tried n played with FX bodies then expect APS-C bodies to give similar performance is totally impossible wat 

n i lost count how many ppl got D90 as their 1st DSLR 
D90 is oso very beginner frenly la, only more features to use
unless u r talking abt D300/D300s then maybe not suitable for beginner la

did they said what went wrong??