QUOTE(Banzai_san @ May 17 2010, 04:58 PM)
Good or bad, it depends on what you plan to mount on it.Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V40!, The Orange Legion
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V40!, The Orange Legion
|
|
May 17 2010, 05:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 17 2010, 05:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
|
|
|
May 17 2010, 05:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(lwliam @ May 17 2010, 05:13 PM) you dont really need a tripod if your main usage for the tripod is to mount it with the 70200, you're better off with a monopod Well, not really. You'll still need a tripod should you are shooting landscapes with 70-200. To me, monopod is quite useless for 70-200 considering it's not that heavy unlike 300mm f2.8 lenses which really need a monopod. |
|
|
May 18 2010, 09:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(ieR @ May 18 2010, 02:09 AM) alright, post some over PPed work... although, very minor manipulation is done thou... No offense but that doesn't seem like minor manipulation. It's more like very the kaw kaw PP-ed and the eyes seems like gone case already.» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
May 22 2010, 08:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
|
|
|
May 22 2010, 10:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 25 2010, 05:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(boyzone @ May 25 2010, 05:01 PM) But they claim will have exposure issue under the sunlight with 50mm prime lens That's not they are trying to imply. What they were actually saying is, you might face over-expose issue when you shoot at big aperture especially during bright day light due to the max you can go is ISO 200. |
|
|
May 25 2010, 05:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
|
|
|
May 25 2010, 06:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
|
|
|
May 25 2010, 06:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
|
VIP
9,778 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2 |
QUOTE(mastering89 @ May 25 2010, 06:52 PM) fansoption : not much detail on my pic. That's the max i can zoom + close up use km3570. vikingw2k's pic is totally different level Nothing fancy, just a cheapo 100mm macro and Raynox 250 filter. vikingw2k : mind sharing what combination lens + close up filter u use Here's another one using Raynox. Nice and cheap macro filter. ![]() |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0250sec
0.33
8 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 11:45 AM |