QUOTE(Quazacolt @ May 5 2010, 02:51 PM)
what evo already said, it downloads what it needs, and thats that. blizz just havent got to using one cumulative singular patch just to get v1's to say, v10 like they've ALWAYS done for diablo1-2, war1-3, WoW, sc1 for some reason and im sure they are prolly testing (oh, this is still the beta, right?)something out on the patching system. you'd think that it wouldnt raise questions to do something different (or in your viewpoint, obsolete and outright terrible) when they've already done what you have describe all the time for all their games.
and lets put it this way, not ALL of us are having painful and slow patching. i dont, for instance.
Added on May 5, 2010, 2:53 pmoh wow someone actually understood whats the purpose of a beta test...
/jokes aside, yeah they are using really similiar tech thats been used for WoW, just a lil different as there arent cumulative patches yet, and/or smarter/faster/better patching compared to WoW
Added on May 5, 2010, 2:54 pmnvm we can play good enuf LOL
just enjoice our sc2 games
well i'm i'm having no problem with the current sc2 patches...
wut it does is that it download files into a hidden 'update' folder and tracks the files in it...
so u could manually download patches and dump them all inside that update folder to patch up by running the client...
QUOTE(MYNAMEISJASON @ May 5 2010, 03:02 PM)
They added the gigantic map editor + new maps which resulted in a larger patch, what so bad with letting it patch a little bit longer.
QUOTE(kianweic @ May 5 2010, 03:09 PM)
It's not the size but the speed of the download.
I gonna let the installer run again in an older PC and see what happens.
Then I gotta test it, hopefully the experience won't be as bad as on my new PC.
patch 9 is close to 500mb (based on the manual patch size)...
it took me around 20 minutes to patch up patch 9 (while raiding lol)...
so it depends on ur connection i guess...
This post has been edited by evofantasy: May 5 2010, 03:23 PM