QUOTE(fujkenasai @ May 8 2010, 11:50 AM)
For those who like to whine and complain and have HATE Talks about Starcraft 2 there is a thread over here.
HOW MUCH I F**KIN HATE BASTURD STARCRAF 2 THREADand please leave this thread for game, maps, patches, purchase disscussion.
This is the SC2 thread.
Dont be a blind Blizzard elitist. With the SC2 beta, Blizzard isnt any better than your assumed to be crap companies.
Besides, you dont own the thread, just because you are the TS.
QUOTE(talexeh @ May 8 2010, 12:15 PM)
LOL, you must have mistaken me as another Blizz fanboy. I love games, but not the companies who made them. Anyway, the difference between you & me are just our perspectives & where we're standing. You look at the current initiatives as a milking scheme while I see it as an alternatives to allow casual gamers try the game without having to pay the full price.
While Blizz has yet to go official on this new plan of theirs, I don't see anything weird since people have been willing to fork out $$$ for the WoW subscriptions for the past years. They're just applying an optional purchase method that mimics how gamers pay for their WoW.
Yes, 30USD is not cheap but if they can make the monthly subscription fees low enough, I really do see it as an advantage, especially to a guy who earns too little to pay for the full 60USD at one go. Now, don't tell me if you're poor, you shouldn't be playing SC2.

Im not saying you are Blizzard fanboy.
There are other alternatives like other companies have done where they release localised version of the game so that the price of the game is cheaper for the local people. This has been done for years, and i know Indian region locked Valve games are cheap as chips. Also, by doing so, people in that region can still get the game on lower price which makes a "subscription" looks more like a milking scheme. Besides, most RTS gamers dont really bother with MMOs in general, as they are more used to retail boxes. This seem to be more out of the norm with the subcription system for a RTS that is not labelled as a MMO, IMO.
30USD for 60 days isnt cheap,IMO, especially considering the countries they are aiming for. While the alternative to get the no subscription system is buying via Blizzard store, it's a bit unfair. Even here, there are a lot of people dont have CC to buy games online from Steam.
On the other hand, the 30 USD version with 60 days limitation is great for those who dont bother about MP at all, but only want to play SP campaign, though. Seriously,how many of us here only want SC2 for SP only?
The problem here is Activision is trying to milk everything. There could be a chance that SC2 might be bastardised like CoD again which i dont want to see it happen.
This post has been edited by Cheesenium: May 8 2010, 12:57 PM