u the 1 missing wen i wanna invite u for COD:WAW

I see there is no room for Korean War....

Oh well maybe next title.

Korean war is the least exploited war because it wasn't a glorious win for either party

Yes the final outcome of the Korean War is the line still drawn at the 38th Paralell but the entire Korean War is so much drama, with South Korean being push to the brink of collapse at the begining of the war, save by MacArthur, then Americans almost push the line all the way to the chinese border. Then China joins the fray and helping the North Korean getting back up to the 38th Parallel.



I say this is a very interesing war as this is the first ever armed cold war confrontation with Soviet tanks vs American troops. There is no glorious win but the struggle for the 38th parallel is no short of epic.

GIMME KOREAN WAR NAO

you forgot the russian's it was basically soviet VS allies. and the war has not ended till today :/

i wonder wat will happen if M-14 oredi exist and use as replacement for M1 Garand by US troops and it's allied during korea wars???

nothing much will change

korean war....the war that American lost....

Which ever side of Korea wins, Japan wins in the end

how so? if north korea wins japan will be next on the chopping block by them.

Not necessary. You see if the North wins, it would indefinitely ignite fear amongst the populace of Japan and may lead to the revoke of Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution which says that Japan shall never have a standing army(actually they do, just that they rename army into self defense force)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_9_of_...se_Constitution

The revoke of such article would enable Japan to enforce conscription as well increasing Japan image as a bulwark against North Korea aggression with the Chinese being reluctant to act upon North Korea. In short, Japan had a reason to remove the needle in the flesh that has been sticking for years.

Let's not forget that Japan would be the front line base of UN. This would in a way gives business opportunities for Japan to create weapons, vehicles and etc in preparation to response North Korea aggression. Wouldn't this make Japan kinda won even if North Korea overruns South Korea?

that is all effective if they can break out of their current economy crisis and if they take a usa or un loan they will be in debt for 100 years to come as they are already in deep debts.

The last time I've checked, it was a stalemate.

just now, baru tahu it's support dedi server..nice

weeee crossbow tube~ xD

WTF! i got feeling it gonna be bad

Call of Duty: Black Ops won't have co-op in single player campaign
Posted Jun 3rd 2010 8:00PM by John Callaham
Filed under: FPS, Multiplayer


In 2008, developer Treyarch finally brought co-op support to the Call of Duty franchise with a co-op mode in the WWII shooter Call of Duty: World at War's single player campaign. It also had the surprising cool four player Nazi Zombie mode. However it looks like Treyarch is doing something a bit different for the co-op modes for their follow-up Call of Duty: Black Ops.

MTV reports that Call of Duty: Black Ops won't have co-op support for the game's single player campaign. However Treyarch's studio head Mark Lamia states, "We're crafting unique co-op modes around that experience, but it is different than what people think." Hopefully the team is coming up with something even cooler than Nazi zombies.

http://news.bigdownload.com/2010/06/03/cal...-player-campai/

no co op in single campaign is acceptable for me.... I always support tyreach from cod2 n cod5.... if no dedicated server... well thats will be different story....

but but in CoD:WAW i play more co-op in campaign than MP... atleast can co-op in zombie mode.. that also acceptable

But nothing is cooler than Nazi zombies....

Russian Zombies? Vietcong Zombies?