dats y when i makan alone... always seat nearest to the sink... hehe

i like this one how u shot this?

huhu i really like that 85mm lens... too bad no AF-S VR version

fuhhh suddenly the poison here very potent shud've went to bed instead~ see what lens will i dream later haha

This post has been edited by dvlzplayground: May 3 2010, 03:47 AM

i think he mean the 105mm end

even tho the max aperture is smaller, due to compression can make the 'illusion' of better bokeh

dats y lens like 55-200 also can make creamy bokeh even though it's not even f2.8. obviously the background need to be far la

then we have the 70-200 f2.8.... GG.. haha

it LOOKS like good bokeh because since u're zooming in from far, u get less background. less background = less clutter = look like good bokeh

n dats y UWA lens hard to get good bokeh. even though the background is blur, there's so much clutter that even at f2.8 it still doesnt look nice

flash a bit too harsh? n too white compared to the background hehe... PP time..

isepunye diam2 got 2 D90 already

i agree with others, too bright, but not the overexposed kind of bright. as in correctly exposed pic but u increase the brightness in PP

if u're trying to do the 'faded' look, try to mess around with the WB n colours more, brightness dun kacau ;p

too much bokeh IMO, not much 'crispy' feeling. damn quite a while dy havent go chili's

HDR? :S that's the problem with fire at night anyway...the sensor dynamic range too small