What's the point of posting congrats when open up a new thread ?
Photography Nikon D90 v7
Photography Nikon D90 v7
|
|
Apr 30 2010, 09:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
I don't get it.
What's the point of posting congrats when open up a new thread ? |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2010, 10:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(zellleonhart @ Apr 30 2010, 09:42 PM) Err battery grip uses only one nikon battery at a moment. when the 1st is going to exhaust it will use the second one. if you use AA batteries then they will be used at the same time. That's a spammer tradition. @KTCY haha it's sort of a tradition XD QUOTE(yushin @ Apr 30 2010, 10:01 PM) Congrats on V7 for fellow D90 users. Yes, very obvious different when wide open.Want to ask you guys a question, can anyone notice the bokeh difference on pictures taken between Nikon 85 F1.4 and Nikon 85 F1.8? And when on FF |
|
|
May 2 2010, 11:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(maxh3h3 @ May 2 2010, 08:04 AM) I once have 2 unit of that But too tight for me to use when dining. Sold if off for 35mm f2 QUOTE(maxh3h3 @ May 2 2010, 08:36 AM) I got 135 f2 and 105 f2 bokeh test. Definitely killer. You wanna see ? QUOTE(noobie1 @ May 2 2010, 08:39 AM) if u have the budget,just get it now..you wont know what will happen tomorrow... Comparing a prime with a zoom is really Added on May 2, 2010, 8:48 am what the price for 200m f2?? i heard the sharpness is more better than 70-200... |
|
|
May 2 2010, 12:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 01:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(noobie1 @ May 2 2010, 12:34 PM) Sharp at wide open 105 cheaper abit but around 4k also QUOTE(Isepunye @ May 2 2010, 01:02 PM) long time didn come here. tired working lo... Bokeh is depends on distance of subject with background actually. So basically, at minimum focusing surely will have. My fishy can have yummy bokeh too btw, picture spam time now~! » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Added on May 2, 2010, 1:15 pmi thnk there is some1 said UWA cant do bokeh nicely.... doubt on it. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
May 2 2010, 04:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
^
1.4 or 1.8 ? better be 1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 04:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
Trying out new color. Hope it's acceptable.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Taken at ISO 3200 hence the small reso |
|
|
May 2 2010, 05:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(maxh3h3 @ May 2 2010, 05:41 PM) I didn't even set to vivid. Currently only got 105mm f2 sample. 135mm f2 sample i not sure which memory card I snap with liao 105mm f2. both aperture set at f2. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « QUOTE(celciuz @ May 2 2010, 05:47 PM) Thanks celciuz. But maxh3h3 said too vivid This post has been edited by KTCY: May 2 2010, 06:05 PM |
|
|
May 2 2010, 07:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
^
Enjoy that 105mm pic ? |
|
|
May 2 2010, 07:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
^
Was using ISO 1600 IIRC. Then don't really process much. So |
|
|
May 2 2010, 08:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 08:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 11:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(voryuz @ May 2 2010, 10:59 PM) Hye, D90 family member, Scenery : AF-S 24mm f/1.4 / Nikkor 14-24Wanna ask, wat is the best lense combo for D90 to capture Potrait/Damn beautiful scene? any opinion? Portrait : 200mm f/2, 135mm f/2, 85mm f/1.4 Oh well, we can just list down all that but do you really need it ? I'd advise go with Tamron 17-50 first tho I don't fancy zoom lenses Anyway, photo spam ![]() EXIF intact |
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 11:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(Isepunye @ May 2 2010, 11:53 PM) Come come QUOTE(edwardgsk @ May 2 2010, 11:53 PM) ^Those lens above all can get him another FX body already one. Yeap. Go with 18-105 as starting i think ok already. Pair with cheap cheap 50mm f/1.8 should be fine enough QUOTE(zellleonhart @ May 2 2010, 11:53 PM) QUOTE(noobie1 @ May 2 2010, 11:53 PM) |
|
|
May 2 2010, 11:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(Isepunye @ May 2 2010, 11:54 PM) nope. at my eyes, it is sharper. a bit sharper. 18105 also less flare compare to 1855. bigger opening give u better light. at my eyes, it give slightly better colors too That's why I didn't use Added on May 2, 2010, 11:54 pm well i thnk tamron F2.8 not so good as the tales... And I don't really like zoom till I uses Nikkor 17-55 and 24-70 as well as 70-200 QUOTE(edwardgsk @ May 2 2010, 11:56 PM) ^Those lens above all can get him another FX body already one. Why keep posting same thing ? Go with 18-105 as starting i think ok already. |
|
|
May 3 2010, 12:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
May 3 2010, 12:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
May 3 2010, 12:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
May 3 2010, 12:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
May 3 2010, 12:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0418sec
0.72
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 08:14 AM |