QUOTE(chowdersoup @ Oct 20 2012, 09:09 AM)
I am 100% with you. This is outright deceiving. This is the most stupid and pathetic answer I have ever heard. So they are saying that they can give you a house without toilet... because everything in the brochure is subject to change.
Anyway, there are ways for you to voice unhappiness.
Make sure you keep an original brochure as proof. If you have any other publication / announcement, keep them. Gather a group of owners and send a new petition. Before this, do some home work and consult a lawyer. I am not a lawyer but I believe you have a very strong case. Guocoland has to show prove that they have indeed submitted the original design ( as per the brochure) for approval. They have show prove that the authority reject this design and that is why they have to come out with the alternate design. They have to show proof why the original design has to be changed and so on... you can demand answers ...sometime you need to play hard-ball.
If they still give you that stupid answer, then you file complaint to the housing tribunal. You need a big group of people .. the more the merrier. You can do this even after the VP. This is because there is some 5% ( if I am not mistaken) retain with the lawyer. The money can only be released to the developer after you sign the final acceptance. So if you can gather a big group of people...5% is a lot of money to the developer.
But I do hope the developer can redo the window and make it better looking. It is good for their reputation ..after all, it is loose change for them only...make RM 9 million profit last quarter 2012.
To them is just small change, just dont understand what make them so difficult, it is actually for their own benefit!!!
Typical irresponsible developer???
Hmmmm
Added on October 20, 2012, 12:16 pmQUOTE(sambelayamijo @ Oct 20 2012, 11:31 AM)
They treat you like you are idiot lah, not primary school student. Now primary school student also very smart already.
I can hardly believe Guocoland willing to tarnish their image just because of one lousy guardhouse.
Approved by the authority? So what? Approved already cannot change anymore? Just BS lah!
Demolish it, re-submit a new design plan to authority & rebuild ah. Still need to teach how to do?
I think the top management got worms in their heads.
No wonder Mah Sing is among the top ranked developer & Guocoland no whare to be seen, even they are from the big reputable Hong Leong Group.
Can Tan Sri sack these idiots who tarnish his Hong Leong group name?
I heard they are going to lauch their Jelo-Lot Bungalow soon, so I wonder who will buy into Guocoland bull story anymore.
Unless they can do better than give stupid excuse, I think I better choose M Residence lah in this case because I feel Guocoland, unlike Mah Sing, don't give a pooh about their valued customers.
So sad I have to forgo this beautiful & strategic location because of some idiots making idiotic decision for Emerald West.


to Mah Sing, they know who are their Revenue Generator.....????
Maybe cutting corners is the best way out, typical local practise.....
Saw in the net their MD is launching a project in damansara, a high end condo......
9 million return over a guard house??
Better rethink, hmm
where is resident parc.
This post has been edited by WTF!: Oct 20 2012, 12:16 PM