Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Property in Sg Long
|
puchongite
|
Oct 14 2014, 01:23 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Oct 14 2014, 12:30 PM) I think to avoid jam entering Cheras Batu 11/Balakong, it is worth to pay the extra RM1/- toll. Anyway all my petrol and toll expenses are paid by Company don't feel the heat yet.  To make U-turn it's RM 2 in total. Right ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 14 2014, 05:23 PM
|
|
QUOTE(danielisme @ Oct 14 2014, 05:15 PM) If not forget , Lastime heard under the agreement concessionaire has rights to increase the toll rate every 4 years but if cabinets not approve then government have to pay compensate to toll operator Yeah there are always these funny clauses which favour the toll operator.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 15 2014, 09:14 AM
|
|
QUOTE(samkps @ Oct 15 2014, 09:11 AM) After the tunnel in twin palm establish, I think hardly Silk will allow you to do so as well.. Sh_t, the twin palm tunnel is something cannot be used yet ? From the discussion I thought just pay RM 1 everything is kaw tim ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 15 2014, 09:32 AM
|
|
QUOTE(LD Jr @ Oct 15 2014, 09:29 AM) If i recall correctly. this thread had discussed about the original connection plan to silk highway, which is nearby the factory area (after Honda Showroom)... After honda showroom now very near the MRT track already. Btw, is MRT track below or above the SILK ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 15 2014, 11:47 AM
|
|
QUOTE(kwwong1 @ Oct 15 2014, 10:19 AM) Yes, red line is flyover. Green line should be quite easy to build, but have to alter the current slip road from semenyih. As long as someone compensate SILK, don't think this is an issue. Maybe just make the current slip road two way by installing traffic light which only allow one direction at one time. The cheapest implementation. Haha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 15 2014, 12:56 PM
|
|
QUOTE(greenmoon @ Oct 15 2014, 12:40 PM) i dont understand the green line design???how to conect it to sg long?? Oh it's like this :- There is already a slip road exit from SILK to sg long. So this new access the initial part runs parallel with it, taking traffic from sg long (to enter SILK), but instead of going forward to join SILK, it goes back and U-turn back to join SILK.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 15 2014, 01:13 PM
|
|
QUOTE(greenmoon @ Oct 15 2014, 01:10 PM) from SILK highway (semenyih to sg long direction), we will exit a one way road to sg long....the design is change the one way road to two way? so we go to SILK by that road??? seem like this one is easier and cheaper  That's something which I always have been thinking but the last part might still have to be altered, otherwise the U-turn to head west to balakong will be too sharp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 15 2014, 01:44 PM
|
|
QUOTE(samkps @ Oct 15 2014, 01:39 PM) Lol... can be done, but the curvature of the road need to be altered, as something similar in twin palm, from my perception, not cheap though.. The root question still unsolved, who are going to pay?  This is pretty much like the mice have meeting wanting to tie a ring on the cat's neck. LOL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 15 2014, 02:26 PM
|
|
QUOTE(jootat @ Oct 15 2014, 02:22 PM) in fact i saw someone did that before "illegally" and i used to see some policeman waiting these culprit and catch them red handed ...  Haha I must admit that it's quite tempting but dangerous too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 15 2014, 02:45 PM
|
|
QUOTE(samkps @ Oct 15 2014, 02:36 PM) hahaha... new flyover (if there is) will be directly go into silk mah, twin palm one is U-turn, to and fro at least 4km already...  I would pay if RM 1 for toll but to make a U-turn 4 km plus RM 1 for toll is too much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 15 2014, 02:55 PM
|
|
QUOTE(samkps @ Oct 15 2014, 02:53 PM) hehehe.. how about RM 2.20 direct entry but RM 1 for 4km U-turn?  Which one you choose? RM 2.2 is too much. None of the above. LOL. This post has been edited by puchongite: Oct 15 2014, 03:05 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 16 2014, 08:52 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Oct 15 2014, 03:15 PM) With another few thousand students from UTAR PJ and UTAR Setapak move to Sg Long next year onward, I forsee traffic jam will be big headache for residents ....Sg Long badly next additional enter-exit point to highway. With this consolidation, any idea the size of UTAR in sg long compared to Kampar ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 16 2014, 08:59 AM
|
|
QUOTE(anakkk @ Oct 16 2014, 08:57 AM) can't compare, the UTAR at Sg Long is a small building, and the new building is coming up soon, heard will be completed next year. I am not trying to compare campus size. I am comparing population size.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 16 2014, 09:25 AM
|
|
QUOTE(InF.anime @ Oct 16 2014, 09:14 AM) Olang Puchong, you want invest in SgLong  Don't get misled by my nick. Haha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 16 2014, 09:38 AM
|
|
QUOTE(InF.anime @ Oct 16 2014, 09:35 AM) Dont tell me you stay in SgLong ha.. I will be very stressful everyday if I stay in Sg long. I am staying in Puchong for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 16 2014, 10:39 AM
|
|
QUOTE(InF.anime @ Oct 16 2014, 09:40 AM) I will be very stressful everyday if I stay in Puchong. I am not staying in Puchong for sure. Yeah it's not meant to step down whichever location, it's to do with where is the work place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 16 2014, 12:33 PM
|
|
QUOTE(greenmoon @ Oct 16 2014, 12:04 PM) why???...sg long is very serene  Haha serene or not serene .... Anyway I replied in the other post already. It's due to workplace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 17 2014, 09:06 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Oct 17 2014, 08:51 AM) ....shall we pressure MCA for interchange? MCA cannot pressure anyone for anything anymore. Ah jib kor said, no voter support cannot ask for more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 17 2014, 10:25 AM
|
|
QUOTE(billyjean1982 @ Oct 17 2014, 10:13 AM) Sometimes it just doesn't make sense, Perak campus with so huge compound, cannot be just running 6 Faculty, while sg long branch are maybe just half the size of Perak branch, so how can it run 8 Faculty? Same question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
puchongite
|
Oct 17 2014, 11:46 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Jazzy @ Oct 17 2014, 11:18 AM) It is not hard to see why if you understand: - 1. You will need to understand the market demographics. *Hint - How many students are willing to relocate to Kampar vs KL. Which target market is more profitable? 2. You will need resources to run the operations. *Hint - Demand and supply for lecturers in both Kampar & KL 3. You will need to maintain the operating cost. *Hint - Maintaining single location vs multiple 4. How UTAR management works.  No the question was not about whether which campus makes more sense. Based on some info presented here, the sg long will have 9 faculties, while kampar will have 8 faculties. The question is the kampar campus is so much bigger than the future sg long one multi-storey building "campus", so physically does not seem to make sense. This post has been edited by puchongite: Oct 17 2014, 11:47 AM
|
|
|
|
|