QUOTE(ico12 @ Apr 25 2010, 08:46 PM)
At least he contributed to the scientific thought more than you ever do and which you will never able to do so.
Stephen Hawkings, too smart until stupid ?, One round trip IQ dip to 0 ?
Stephen Hawkings, too smart until stupid ?, One round trip IQ dip to 0 ?
|
|
Apr 25 2010, 09:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
93 posts Joined: Apr 2010 |
|
|
|
Apr 25 2010, 09:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
93 posts Joined: Apr 2010 |
|
|
|
Apr 25 2010, 11:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
93 posts Joined: Apr 2010 |
QUOTE(garytong @ Apr 25 2010, 10:08 PM) I have more respect for Michio Kaku than that wheelchair bound overrated crank with huge ego Stephen Hawking. Michio Kaku is surely a genius scientist, so does Stephen Hawking. You forgot to take into account that Stephen Hawking was just presenting his own idea and opinion which might be subjected to scientific research and scrutiny. As far as I know, by reading his thought above, he never claimed to be absolute accurate in his explanation. Why are you resorting to bash him for no good sane reason? He said, in all probability, alien might exist in outer space, probably other galaxies far far away from us, thus, their surprised visit will not be accomplished within this time period. Remember, though his thought might be dismissed as science fiction now, it doesn't mean that it's improbable. A few hundreds years ago, if someone from 16 th century predicted about human boarding flying device to travel to other continents or space exploration, that someone will be regarded as imaginative insane man. However, it's a reality nowadays. |
|
|
Apr 25 2010, 11:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
93 posts Joined: Apr 2010 |
QUOTE(garytong @ Apr 25 2010, 10:00 PM) Wow, so no one can challenge the logic of Stephen Hawking just because he has way more PHD? Find for me from his quotation where he said he is ABSOLUTELY correct. But please bear in mind that a different weight must be assigned to his idea because he is a scientist. The only person who is qualified to refute him is another scientist. A laymen like me and you should just keep quiet then researched more on this topic. So he's always right because of his awards/phd? Fantastic. I suppose he can go around shagging anyone's wife as well, because he cannot possibly be wrong and he deserves it because he has PHD and Nobel prizes. Mor*n! A barber doesn't have the right to criticize the method utilized by a lecturer in his lecture, same case here. |
|
|
Apr 25 2010, 11:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
93 posts Joined: Apr 2010 |
QUOTE(garytong @ Apr 25 2010, 11:16 PM) Bullshit. What he said so far has got nothing to do with actual math and physics, just mostly philosophical and unproven theories. As I emphasized above, it takes a scientist to refute or debunk another scientist's hypothesis. If any Tom, d***, and Harry can comment on him, the profession of scientist will be left without any academic quality. Of course he is mortal and can die like you and me, I didn't recall if he said anything about being immortal or being god in any of his writing. Though he did imply one day human can attain immortality through cloning or DNA preservation method. I can't actually remember but something to that effect. To say that only he can say his piece is insultingly arrogant. He's no more mortal than anyone else around on this planet and he won't live forever. He's going to die anyway so he's not special. His contribution to humanity is just that, unproven theories. If you want to know Stephen Hawking's contribution, please go and ask his students. I wonder why you aimed your arrow of hatred against this scientist? Nobody disproved Einstein's theory unless he is another scientist working in the same field as him. |
|
|
Apr 25 2010, 11:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
93 posts Joined: Apr 2010 |
|
|
|
Apr 26 2010, 04:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
93 posts Joined: Apr 2010 |
QUOTE(malayneum @ Apr 26 2010, 04:20 AM) aliens didnt exist. 2000 years ago, human disbelieve in the existence of germs, but now they are real. The existence of alien is highly probable.hawkings is stupid. yes the universe is big, but he forgot TIME is also big. in a vast vast timeline of the universe, intelligent earthlings and intelligent aliens cannot exist at the same time. the probablity is too low. |
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0165sec
0.78
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 09:26 AM |