Photography Micro Four Thirds (m43) User Thread V2, Panasonic G/GH/GFx & Olympus E-P/E-PLx
Photography Micro Four Thirds (m43) User Thread V2, Panasonic G/GH/GFx & Olympus E-P/E-PLx
|
|
Apr 23 2010, 07:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 25 2010, 08:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(samurai1337 @ Apr 25 2010, 02:49 PM) What's the manual way you're referring to, and how easy do you want? You can always use Lightroom to import, apply some basic settings and export (convert to Jpeg) in batch - not sure if that's "auto" or "manual" for you. Doesn't really say can make closer to the punchier output. Looks like more natural to me. Anyway, for GF1 users I've found a guide to tune the white balance and film mode to make the out-of-camera Jpeg output to be closer to the punchier output from Olympus Pen series. http://www.flickr.com/groups/dmc-gf1/discu...57623923774322/ Did I read wrongly? |
|
|
Apr 26 2010, 09:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(samurai1337 @ Apr 26 2010, 08:33 AM) That's right, the main purpose is to improve the output from GF1 to look more natural, and in some way, contrasty. I've read a few tunings here and there, but still need to play around with the settings haha. Adjust own WB, auto doesn't work that well sometimes. And also sometimes the output from the LCD screen doesn't match what I see on the PC screen. Is it monitor not calibrated? Or the GF1's LCD just too bright. First is the white balance thing, after adjusting the AWB it gives you a warmer feel which is to counter-act the cooler feel (which makes the photo looks flat) that GF1 gives by default. Second is the film mode, the author changed the default to Vibrant (high contrast and saturation), but reducing contrast and saturation value by 1. However it still makes the photo looks punchier than the Std more QUOTE(walikard @ Apr 26 2010, 08:53 AM) Guys, need your help. My flickr appear in chinese character, which I can't understand. anyone knows how to rectify this? I think you accidentally clicked the language settings, try scroll down to the bottom, just before the Copy Right wordings, there are a few languages click "English" Thanks a lot in advance ya ![]() |
|
|
Apr 26 2010, 12:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
|
|
|
Apr 26 2010, 01:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
No regret cos of the size, but regret cos of the price.
Added on April 26, 2010, 1:28 pm QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Apr 26 2010, 01:27 PM) During the weekends.. I went to molest cameras... 550D, GF1 and E-PL1. Already using a S90 and FZ28... so a bit hesitant as to whether it's the right route. If you want to be pro get 550D, light-pro GF1, casual E-PL1, but then you already got S90 why casual again? Just my 2 cents This post has been edited by Wuahaha: Apr 26 2010, 01:30 PM |
|
|
Apr 26 2010, 04:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(hellfire8888 @ Apr 26 2010, 02:33 PM) no regret..getting m43 especially with the latest firmware it improve AF Alienware is hardly a netbook wor .. haha must get a matching netbook to go together with my ep2..alienware m11x is the perfect match QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Apr 26 2010, 03:05 PM) Don't get me wrong... I love my S90 to death but both my cameras lacking a narrow DoF and a dslr is too much of a commitment. *sigh* You want narrow DoF, then you need a lens with big aperture lor. But depends your usage, brand taste and future commitment lah If kena lottery.. then problem solved --> M9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 26 2010, 04:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(walikard @ Apr 26 2010, 03:43 PM) Why not get the Panny 20mm f1.7 ? QUOTE(y_owez @ Apr 26 2010, 04:21 PM) i went to touch touch these models just now I'll probably wait for G2 haha, unless you are in rush of getting one for a coming trip ? the salesperson keep asking me to get ep1? interested with G1 ( wanting g2 in june )but he macam tak layan panny? but ep1 only got silver? wante ep2 but with super big lens ( i dont know bout lenses i like the metal body of olympus but i like the g2( future ) touchscreen n flip screen help/? |
|
|
Apr 26 2010, 04:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
|
|
|
Apr 26 2010, 05:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(y_owez @ Apr 26 2010, 04:53 PM) ep2? is epl1 latest?? E-P2 and E-PL1 are targeted to different users la .. as I said b4 if you are casual then E-PL1 is the right cam for you hmm i assume all 3 are not touchscreen? how bout sony's ? launching in may? Added on April 26, 2010, 4:55 pmand ep2 gt built in flash right?not gonna spend to get external le..just a hobby |
|
|
Apr 27 2010, 01:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(frequency @ Apr 27 2010, 09:44 AM) night portrait shoot really challenging... Can be very subjective, depending how you shoot it, what aperture, shutterspeed, ISO, handheld or tripod, IS on/off, etc etc. anyone can post some picture of nite portrait? =( mine failed miserably...=( QUOTE(vixxiee @ Apr 27 2010, 12:13 PM) I think is better to show the some info (mentioned above) as a reference. This post has been edited by Wuahaha: Apr 27 2010, 01:40 PM |
|
|
Apr 27 2010, 02:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(adibyss @ Apr 27 2010, 02:20 PM) Hi, 1. For Olympus flashes compatibilities of GF1 check under External Flash in this link:Few questions. 1. Can I use olympus PEN compatible flashes with the GF1? 2. Can I use the EP-2 EVF on the GF1? 3. Has anyone tried the Voigtlander 40mm viewfinder with the 20mm pancake? How was it? thanks http://panasonic.jp/support/global/cs/dsc/connect/g1.html 2. I dun think any Olympus's EVF are compatible with GF1. 3. Not tried .. can't answer you. |
|
|
Apr 27 2010, 05:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
Anyone tried to stack lenses together? Crazy ...
![]() Read more here: http://www.tomytec.co.jp/borg/world/new/gf1/gf1.html This post has been edited by Wuahaha: Apr 27 2010, 05:03 PM |
|
|
Apr 27 2010, 11:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(samurai1337 @ Apr 27 2010, 10:24 PM) With the panny 20mm pancake lens widest aperture (f/1.7) and excessive neon lighting, there's no problem shooting with 1/100s shutter speed and ISO 100 Yeah bro .. more pics more !! Camera: Panasonic DMC-GF1 Exposure: 0.01 sec (1/100) Aperture: f/1.7 Focal Length: 20 mm ISO Speed: 100 ![]() It's a photo of Tokyo red light district by the way |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 28 2010, 09:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(heavenhell90 @ Apr 28 2010, 09:36 AM) actually based on experience, do you guys recommend GF1 or EPL-1? function n performance wise... Dude, this question has been asked million times lol, you can find a lot of comparison reviews online, please Google. and since it's micro four thirds, does it mean it has the same mount? Olympus can use Pana 20mm 1.7? GF1 for faster AF performance, higher ISO, faster shutterspeed. E-PL1 for built-in IS, more art filters, more punch for Jpeg output. Yes is same mount for both can exchange lenses to use. |
|
|
Apr 28 2010, 10:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
Actually I'm not so sure how fast the AF difference between both, mostly read from what other reviewers said.
GF1 is faster due to the pre-AF and using Panny own lens. |
|
|
Apr 28 2010, 01:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
Phewww ... finally sold my 70-300mm + MMF1 combo
Time to get a new lens, stuck in between 14-140mm and 45-200mm. |
|
|
Apr 28 2010, 01:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
|
|
|
Apr 28 2010, 08:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
I dunno if just me or what ... I am seriously turned off by the leather half case/pouch.
Maybe it's a fashion thing, hohoho ... no offense to anyone. |
|
|
Apr 28 2010, 08:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(adibyss @ Apr 28 2010, 08:36 PM) Yeah that's a very very nice lens, but also way over my budget ... for now Added on April 28, 2010, 8:49 pmDinner time !! Some food shots from my 20mm f1.7 ... Very nice steak and chicken chop at Dicanter @ Section 17 ![]() ![]() This post has been edited by Wuahaha: Apr 28 2010, 08:51 PM |
|
|
Apr 29 2010, 12:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(adibyss @ Apr 28 2010, 08:56 PM) guys heard about the mirror adapter for GF1 cameras? oh man, if they make that i'll surely buy it. dream item!! You mean the micro four third adapter with a mirror patented by Panasonic to use it as an optical view finder? That's crap, m4/3 is supposed to live without the mirror LOL. Meaning .. it's gonna make a m4/3 back to a DSLR .. LMFAO !! Refernce: http://43rumors.com/panasonic-patent-shows...hase-detection/ To improve AF at the expense of making the camera more bulky. Better explanation here: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20003117-1.html This post has been edited by Wuahaha: Apr 29 2010, 12:19 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0212sec
0.18
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 08:02 AM |