only short of prime at the moment, will do so when i sleep tonite
wat is the mininum hours pls ?
AMD 64/SEMPRON ---- OC DATABASE, Ocing results..OC problem?ask here..
|
|
 May 28 2005, 02:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
1,666 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Spore/JohorBP   
|
is the info given here enough to be added to the OC Database ??
only short of prime at the moment, will do so when i sleep tonite wat is the mininum hours pls ? |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
May 31 2005, 04:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
1,666 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Spore/JohorBP
|
i heard that older venice 3000+ batch like 0505 - 0507 require higher v-core to get 2.8ghz, say 1.6-1.65V.
while the newer 3000+ batch after 0517 do not require as high v-core ?? I'm with the newer 0517 batch with 1.55v @ 2.8ghz. wat say u masters ?? |
|
|
May 31 2005, 11:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
1,666 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Spore/JohorBP
|
geezz .. at 2.8ghz, prime not stable.
lowered to 2.745ghuz, its lot better. game for more than 6hrs no problem, and bout 4hrs + Prime95 torture test could be under voltage on cpu... Here's screenie..  |
|
|
May 31 2005, 11:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
1,666 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Spore/JohorBP
|
QUOTE(babyelf @ May 31 2005, 04:56 PM) very early ones can hit high clocks with low volts oh, why do they always have to go mess with the vcore thing ?? the ones between 08 to 16 needs more vcore.. now they're back to low volts again..  k ... i'm so new to AMD cpus ... |
|
|
Jun 1 2005, 01:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
1,666 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Spore/JohorBP
|
i must really do 2 loud claps for Pccrazy's commitment to this thread
 information are updated as to date always. nice |
|
|
Jun 1 2005, 08:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
1,666 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Spore/JohorBP
|
QUOTE(PCcrazy @ Jun 1 2005, 02:06 AM) Thanks dude cool, frend tested it recently & gave the same feedback too.  Testing winxp64 at the moment, found out something interesting just now. Sandra cpu benchmark did 12400 ALU in winxp64 from 11856 in winxp at the same clock speed. Drawbacks of the x64, the corecenter is not working and so does CBidentifier. Not to mention other types of programs. This basic tools is very important to monitor oc. Guys if you have solutions for this, please share. Everything runs smoother and a lot better than winxp 32. But I still advice you to stay on winxp 32 as most of the program fail to even execute. so, when is microsoft coming out with 64bit IE ?? |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0336sec
 0.39
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 11:41 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.