Oh my really expensive. LOL~

20.5k i seen last time..if not mistaken...lol..really like holding a kancil on ur hand..

is all because of the F2.8 .... .... >.<

nikon 600mm f2.8 almost 40k.@@

Woaaahhh~~!!
Really like holding a car in your hands.

+100000000000000000000000  

---

Added on April 20, 2010, 3:33 pm
yea mannn..either u buy that car...or u get the lens...

AF-S NIKKOR 600mm f/4G ED VR bro

600mm f2.8 will cost a BOMB

Hmmm tough question. Maybe I'll get a car. But some would thing otherwise. Hehehe~

is all because of the F2.8 .... .... >.<

viking, u too much liao
why keep poison us with Canon super tele prime?

vikingw2k pls dont poison us with Canon cannons. Hahahha~!

I'll go with Will on this... saw that lens being LensCoated at their website... Damn HUGE!

Ahahaha... that might be true... wonder which one is heavier/bigger... the sigma 200-500mm f2.8 or that Bazooka...

It's like holding a super heavy dumbbell and u can exercise when holding.

This place looks familiar 
was it in Disneyland LA?

vikingw2k : I love the smoke! It's like some evil spirit trying to consume Disneyland.

awesome!! great picture u have there

viking i like this disney pic..very erm "disney" like.........
anyway how far were u worr??

I think LA got the same thing..lol, i got the photo.

ieR: do u mean tat, the noise is actually not that bad and can say it's nothing tat spoil the photo?

Say you are shooting a wedding and here's the bride and her mom embracing impromptu with tears flowing down their cheeks and you got the shot. For people looking at this shot, would they say, "Wow! Look at the noise!!" ?

Which one has nicer IQ between Minolta 24mm and 28mm? Would 24mm b too wide ah? Cause I plan to change my setup to all primes. Optimus primes. Hahahah~

It should b enough for a walk around lens rite? Cause 50mm is a little too tight. Hmm.

letting go my A700 & jump to 7D soon

might sell around 2.5k

y suddenly jump??

kena poison

albert, can u explain more about jello shake (rolling shutter)? wat izzit? i'm read at wiki but... 

Planning to change only. Shouldnt all primes be cheaper? But a hassle to change lens every time when I wanna shoot. Getting slow n steady instead of spending an amount of money on 1 lens.

I love my 50mm n it's always attached to my body. Just sometimes I feel its a little too tight at times. So plan to get either a 24mm or 28mm. But I'm keeping my 50mm of course.

well, the first most obvious point is, non of us are professional "editor" hence, whatever video we shoot, we never get result like those :/ those are undergone editing and encoding cut paste etcetc, look for raw video from 7D,

the point is must be friendly, out of the camera if possible, undergone PP video are just another production video that many of us can never reach. just my 2 cent

many of us do no have those type of time to edit, cut paste etc, we i just prefer 'out of camera' vid i did editing(15min to hours videos), but it was years ago, and i do not own a powerful pc, still using window XP... i doubt it can even process AVCHD properly.

now, i just throw my video(normal HD format) to my partner to do the editing, coz i am too lazy to do it . when i buy A7xx, and if i requires to edit, then no choice buy new pc lor

so if u DIY a bigger bounce card, it will result in increase of % front fill light, the bigger the bounce card, the more it light comes from front, u notice the cheek will start to pop up oily look like PNS.

The main reason we use a ceiling that's low enough to bounce is because the ceiling provides a huge space for the light to bounce from thus creating a large light source that is the main cause of 'soft' light. Isn't that correct?

is this a good lens?
tokina 80-200f2.8?

And how much would that be? I love primes but im too lazy to interchange lens and I dont have money to get 2 bodies. Haahaha.

but doesn't it will keep letting the dust in through the body everytime you change the lens O^O ?

Quite expensive also. Out of my budget d. Maybe I'll consider Sigma 20mm f1.8.
U can always clean them.

thts y every photographer should have a blower with them..

wanna ask bro here what u all use to wipe the front lens element?? its abit fuzzy lo..

vikingw2k : Chill la bro! XD

I wonder, who complained... 

sorry Viking, and my apologies to the person who complain.

okay, stick back a little on the diamond, but with photography term~

now i officially turn my diamond topic to 'how to shoot diamond' and share the knowlegde i gathered so far from other people.

diamond, well, depend on CUT, it Will sparkle on its own, that's the beauty of diamond, and only the low CUTting diamond do not shine as good. shooting it directly under halogen light will have too much sparkle, u cant capture the 'cutting' diamond photography is about 'cutting' not just sparkle. even a nice cutting shot is better then a over sparkled pic.

when u shot it with flash, the sparkle might spoil the whole picture, best is to have the room naturally lit up (bouncing around) or have a light as low(angle) as the diamond from one corner. where it pushes the lightwave to the other side...

mmmm i will try it out then share it out to u guys, anyone has idea or contribution to share? maybe anyone who shoot jewelry or accessories subject before?

f1.0

A quick thought of the day:
A700 + 35mm F1.4G vs A850 + 50mm F1.4 (picture quality , value?)

Can these 2 combination be compared side by side?
Which will u choose lets say u already own A700 and the 50mm F1.4. Both A850 and 35mm F1.4G i think has almost similar price.. rm 5500++ 

vikingw2k : Great minds think alike. XD

a850 or wait for a700 replacement...???