Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 overpriced cables, marketing gimmicks

views
     
spacelion
post Apr 9 2010, 01:30 PM

Ada Liu
******
Senior Member
1,690 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Probation?
21 ringgit HDMI cables from Sri Computers. hasn't failed me yet.
Terence573
post Apr 9 2010, 01:34 PM

wow!!!!!
*******
Senior Member
2,459 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Land Below the Wind


wow $800 for the icable.....holy crap.

so its the same goes to the s-video monster and so?
stevenlys
post Apr 9 2010, 01:38 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
846 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Subang Jaya


For normal user who gaming in a PC monitor , cheapo HDMI will do, if you are using those HT(Home theater) or using big LCD with 7.1-9.2 HT surround(Not those pc brand speaker Logitech.....etc) you will see the difference. Been using Monster and audioquest all the while with my gaming and movie. Loving it. And tested between CAt ayam and branded.
lksing78
post Apr 10 2010, 07:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
91 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: People Republic Of Malaysia

mine even cheap then tesco..rm15
cause mine free..hahahha..
korek from sony shop..
For those who buy LCD TV do insist HDMI for free brows.gif

This post has been edited by lksing78: Apr 10 2010, 07:18 PM
TSyuktsi14
post Apr 11 2010, 09:31 PM

Gloomy Sunday
*******
Senior Member
2,585 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Sibu, Sarawak



i compared a rm200 sony hdmi cable that my dad bought together with the bravia, and the rm30 that i use for my xbox
dont feel any difference
ham_revilo
post Apr 11 2010, 10:54 PM

I
*******
Senior Member
6,583 posts

Joined: Feb 2008


QUOTE(yuktsi14 @ Apr 11 2010, 09:31 PM)
i compared a rm200 sony hdmi cable that my dad bought together with the bravia, and the rm30 that i use for my xbox
dont feel any difference
*
didnt anyone told you that to print the name "SONY" on the cable cost more? it feels great to use it because the name doesnt fades away easily compare to those brandless ones.

This post has been edited by ham_revilo: Apr 11 2010, 10:55 PM
FiReGunZ1499
post Apr 12 2010, 02:01 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
228 posts

Joined: May 2008


thanks 4 the info flex.gif flex.gif
nearly fall to the monster gimmick
xeNOS
post Apr 12 2010, 01:01 PM

.:floccinaucinihilipilification:.
******
Senior Member
1,194 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
yea monster cables are for burning a hole in ur pocket, its been proven total crap.. so just use the no-brand HDMI can liao smile.gif
spacelion
post Apr 16 2010, 01:49 PM

Ada Liu
******
Senior Member
1,690 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Probation?
I found a good site that reviewed almost every HDMI cable they could get their hands on. They're geeks, so be thankful that they did the testing for us.

Results
QUOTE
Every cable over 10 meters failed to pass 1080p, even at 8-bit, though Monster claims their m1000 Series can do just about anything (they didn't provide a cable over 10m to test and they don't sell it at lengths above 25 feet). At 10 meters the Monster Cable 700HD and 1000HD passes 8-bit, and we added Blue Jeans Cable (30 feet actually) and DVIGear. Blue Jeans, incidentally, uses a Belden-made HDMI cable. When we increased the bits to simulate 1080p at 12-bit Deep Color (similar to what's available in most HDMI 1.3a-rated products today) most manufacturers had to drop back to 5 meters to pass the signal. Blue Jeans passed it at 30 feet, but DVIGear requires their active cable solution to do a full 10 meters. Monster Cables' 1000HD cable also passed 1080p at 12-bit with no issues.
source: http://www.audioholics.com/education/cable...ble-bench-tests


QUOTE
It turns out that manufacturers aren't idiots; and I bet more than a few realize that they can spec their cables higher due to the lack of content to prove them wrong. In short, they are getting away with it... for now.


http://www.audioholics.com/education/cable...tion-conclusion

the answer is - Wait and See.

For most of us Malaysians, i think we won't line our walls with HDMI, prefer to keep it outside, but for the rich enthusiast who will put a hole in their wall for the entire setup, its best to tunggu sekejap, because HDMI will defo upgrade. when we hit 12 bit there's apparently very few cables on the market that can handle it.

This post has been edited by spacelion: Apr 16 2010, 01:52 PM
KaFai
post Apr 21 2010, 11:11 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
459 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
I think it depends on the distance from the source to the receiver also. If the distance is short (less than 3m), I think we won't feel any difference between cheap & expensive HDMI cable. If the distance is long (more than 5m or 10m), there might be some quality difference noticeable bcoz expensive ones do use better material for their cables like gold plated & other stuffs.

If you search Monster cable on Wikipedia, you can find that Monster caused a lot of controversy by charging high price for their products that have no significant difference to regular cables.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monster_Cable_Products

So for us average users, I think a cheap one will do the job.
ycs
post Apr 21 2010, 12:32 PM

MEMBER
*******
Senior Member
4,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Selangor



so far i only use free hdmi cables that comes with the tv, media player and bought a generic 10m hdmi cable for my PJ and so far no problems.
StereophileDream
post Apr 21 2010, 02:26 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
391 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
Yaya,total agreed!!!Even in the age when using analog cable,it is also recommended to train yourself by using the cheaper cable for some time before moving onto the more expensive cable.I dun think we need to buy too expensive digital cable and rather spend the extra money elsewhere .

3 Pages < 1 2 3Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0176sec    0.61    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 05:08 AM