I've also noticed something myself. People here complaining about Unifi are as 'flip flop' as TM's T&C. One minute they complain about high latency (for low bandwidth applications like online gaming), next they complain about speed, then they complain about download cap, T&C, company policy, fiber infrastructure and even the name of the damn service. What the heck do you guys want exactly? All of those things are related but they're brought up as separate issues.

I have stuck to my point from the very beginning -- that I hate the daily download cap and that the monthly cap should be increased. When TM decides to actually listen for once and remove the cap so record some damn user statistics instead of guessing extremely low numbers, you people claim they're setting up a trap to lure customers in and they'll somehow make the cap even lower than advertised.

The fact is nobody knows what TM will do next but what we can be sure of is the current performance Unifi users are getting at the moment. However, when these users post their speedtests and latency tests, you toss them aside and claim you don't give a shit and it's all about policy.. then ask where are the latency graphs. Grow up lah. Nothing is certain at this point. Datacenter lines all have limitations, caps and whatnot and they're fully packed with servers. If TM were to provide capped access, they would still get a load of customers while maintaining network speed. I'd rather have 20mbps capped access performing at the current level than 100mbps unmetered functioning at 512kbps.

The best part about half (or more) of the people complaining about Unifi here is that they can't even sign up for it yet because they're not covered.. and when users who have ALREADY signed up for it and are using it post their experiences, they get told off for being morons. It's as though you people think that if Unifi eventually gets capped, we won't be able to access the internet by any other means at all.