Err.. didn't u all know that the streaming of IPTV DOES NOT INCLUDE in the internet-download-quota?

the internet-download-quota is solely for internet. The Streaming IPTV is unlimited. U can watch the streaming IPTV 24/7

btw, now the CAP thingy have been lifted out. Why need to mock anymore??

dude, u r the one who fail.

I can view the website just now.

(advice: use IE)

owh, i thought he meant "Streaming TV" which make me think its IPTV, but its "streaming TV Series" what happen to my eyes? Blur already

anyway, since now the CAP has been lifted out, why need mocking anymore? Now u can enjoy UNLIMITED Internet. U can use 24/7 if u want.

No. They used the same line, but there's a device used to seperate between "Internet", "IPTV" and "Telephone Line", which known as Set-top box. But I'm not sure though. Can someone clarify on me regarding this matter?

so which cap u think personally is better?

Cap monthly download usage or cap on certain period of time?
or did we've any other cap choices?

people who had live on oversea should have experience on this (i heard UK implement the cap thingy regardless the HSBB that they have)

but they do mention that its just capped to 20%, means for 5mb then after 60Gb dwld, the speed will reduce to 1mb.. u can still dwld/youtubing/etc2 but at low speed laa

---

Added on March 26, 2010, 6:38 pmwow, nice idea!

This post has been edited by roommate: Mar 26 2010, 06:38 PM

i don't think that would work coz they will keep complaining

the main point they bragged is they still can charged at current price but plz apply a reasonable capped. Thats it.

Fixed.

the capped have been temporarily lifted out.

D-Link is quite reputable branded for modem/router if u asked me.

yes, temporary. So now enjoy it to the max la.

After being imposed the cap thingy (heard that it gonna be on 2011, but not sure), then LOL

I'm really hope TM could revise the Cap.

I know that worldwide is implementing cap including Aus, UK and US, but lets hope TM could revised it so that its fair and square and win-win situation.

---

Added on March 26, 2010, 8:37 pmit do have different la.

N is faster than a/b/g. It have stronger reception from the added antenna, which means less loss.

This post has been edited by roommate: Mar 26 2010, 08:37 PM

Err, shouldn't u read all those T&C including all in very small font before signing-up any contract? It its clearly stated in the T&C, and u couldn't claim ""Ok I didn't sign up for this shit""

anyway, back on track, I know the cap thingy totally limits our tempting to subscribe it. Thats why we need to keep demanding until its win-win situation. U know, they're business person, they should know supply-demand chain rule.

wow, the speed increase tremendously!

The jokes back on you as now they already suspend (means temporarily) lifted out the cap policy.

At last Man enjoy his Unifi to the max!

p/s: this is also a joke. no hard feelings, k?

---

Added on March 27, 2010, 4:39 pmI'm with you too!! Country like German implement the same way.

I'm really hope they change the capping ways, based on peak-hour and unlimited, not as per usage.

This post has been edited by roommate: Mar 27 2010, 04:39 PM

Err, other telcos (celcom/digi/maxis) are actually using TM backbone. Heard this from my friends long time ago, who happen to be an engineer in telecommunication industries.

I don't know la if today they already can built their own infrastructure. But all on all, they still need to pass-through TM in any ways bcoz TM is the pioneer of Telco industries in Malaysia, hence many tower/base-station is build by TM.

Wow, my memory still serve me well.

Means they still use TM backbone/infrastructure la, rite? Now who said other telco can't used TM service.

p/s: this seems a lil bit out of topic.

wow, no more monopoly? more Internet service provider, a great deal to consumer.

Seems our HSBB is much2 better (in terms of price and download quota) than NZ.

But to compare with other asian countries, like Korea/Japan, they're much cheaper.

Don't know should I be thankful or mad.