The issue about cap is that it has to exist, but the question is how much. 60GB? Gila
I'd think they should raise it at least double/triple the previous cap amount, and Speed cap those above quota to the existing level.

However, they should also introduce pricing for those who wish to use more and can pay for it. The way it works in Canada is $2 for each GB, up to a maximum of $25

IPTV for consumers eh?
Did you recall TM saying that if they are selling the access of the the fibre optic to other competitor, they must offer Value added service as well?
Thats anti-competitve behaviour for you.

IPTV is just a means for them to charge monopolistic prices. Heck, most people don't need this stupid IPTV. Not with its channel selection anyways.
The reason TM has a IPTV bundled is because they are a monopoly. Monopoly can do whatever they want. If the charge Rm150 for 5Mbps+IPTV, they can say it's cheap because it comes with IPTV bundle. But the trouble is, why can't I choose internet only for a cheaper price?

They don't provide us consumers with a choice. It's either you get triple play, or you get all so throttle steamix.
If we have antitrust law, TM will kena sued until their pants fall off.

TM is GLC. 1st and 2nd largest shareholder are Khazanah and KWSP which totals up to a bit less than 50% of total shares.
Unifi uses part of Government money to buildup, i.e, our money, our mom and dad's money. Why do we not have the right to complained
I'm sure you read this few pages back.

Andohbtw, AFAIK, There were other people who were interested in taking up the the HSBB project, but it was 'awarded' to TM. So basically, the G is telling TM, 'here's another new monopolistic service for you to control. And TM decided to make it harder for other competitors to join in by telling them you gotta offer 'value added service' or we won't sell you access. Besides, they are behaving like how you expect a monopolist to behave. By refusing to unbundle IPTV and tells you they are selling digital lifestyle service? What tahi lembu is this.

This post has been edited by kaiserreich: Apr 2 2010, 09:47 AM

Even if TM is a fully private company, as a consumer, we have a right to tell them that whatever we think. It's called end user feedback.

As much as I don't like it, I have to agree that TM is one of the best candidates to deliver and handle this project.
I am not blaming TM for getting the privileges. I was pointing out the fact that they are abusing this right given to them, by behaving anti-competitively.

This post has been edited by kaiserreich: Apr 2 2010, 12:51 PM