Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Unifi Boycott Unifi - capped connection

views
     
mylinear
post Mar 28 2010, 03:03 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(silverhawk @ Mar 28 2010, 01:35 PM)
Then don't market is as such. Simple as that no?

If you tell me I get unlimited downloads, don't complain when I actually use it like that! Which is why I'm saying caps are fine, but if you want my business and others, make it reasonable. Don't just give empty marketing promises, and then pull back what you promised when people use what you advertised for.

*
Could you please point to where you find "unlimited download" or "unlimited data transfer"? I have been looking but have not been successful.


QUOTE
41. Why TM is offering unlimited packages & at the same time limits the amount of traffic?
Unlimited means that there is no time capping for user to access to the Internet and it does not mean that user can download/upload an unlimited volume of data.
Also, pleas understand difference between shared and dedicated.

QUOTE
37. What is a 'contention ratio'?
To provide a cost effective service – Streamyx is 'contended' (shared) at the following ratios:

Package Download Speed Upload Speed Contention Ratio
Streamyx 384k  384k 128k 1:25
Streamyx 512k  512k 256k 1:25
Streamyx 1.0M  1.0M 384k 1:25
Streamyx 2.0M  2.0M 512k 1:25
Streamyx 4.0M  4.0M 512k 1:25

This contention is applied within the TM network - with other Streamyx subscribers on the same TM telephone exchange.

What this means in the 'worst case' is that you could be sharing a 1000 kbps connection with up to 25 other users. So if they were all using Streamyx at the same time 'theoretically' you would only get 40 kbps.

However, 'in reality' this scenario is very unlikely to happen and you should usually find it to be far faster than a dial-up connection.

Streamyx relies on individual users not making unreasonable traffic demands on the network to provide fast access speeds for all.

Remember if you are not getting the speed that you expect, it may not be due to the contention ratio only but many other factors including the capacity of the remote site you are accessing, the quality and distance of your telephone line from the local exchange.

The problem here is that just because you were getting full speeds or were able to download lots of stuff in the past, most have not bothered to understand how things were working. You made your own assumptions about it. Now that you do not get what you used to get, there is complaints. But the sharing has been there all this while, maybe not so noticebale few years ago, but more noticeable now.

Why do you think there are also options for dedicated leased lines (especialy for corporate users)? If Streamyx was actually not shared, then there would not be any need for dedicated lines. Users need to take some time to understand all this so that when arguments are put forth, it will be more reasonable. No point just going on with "I don't care, I want unlimited...".


mylinear
post Mar 28 2010, 04:04 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(silverhawk @ Mar 28 2010, 03:13 PM)
It was there when I signed my contract many years ago. If any of you were using streamyx that time, the words "unlimited" was there because their earlier packages were limited by hours.
The "unlimited" is very different from "unlimited download" or "unlimited data transfer". In the case above, the unlimited would refer to unlimited usage, as in use as many hours as you want, ie not a limited 60 hour package. Not time limited.

As I've said, the unlimited has been interpreted by users in a way most suitable for them which is not really the correct interpretation unless it was explicitly stated in that way.

QUOTE(silverhawk @ Mar 28 2010, 03:13 PM)
You're only looking at what you want to look at. Look at what I've wrote, and I've not said "i don't care, I want unlimited". Heck, I hate those people who say that also, because it makes our opposition weaker. If you noticed, I'm all for caps and I've been advocating for it, just that caps have to be reasonable.

*
silverhawk, the "I don't care..." was not directed at you. It was a general statement. Sorry if I was not clear.

mylinear
post Mar 28 2010, 04:41 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(almaty @ Mar 28 2010, 04:17 PM)
i have seen the words "unlimited downloads" on streamyxs website in the past. iirc, it even goes to say you how fast/much music we can download or something along those lines.
I think I've only seen terms such as unlimited access and always-on. Anyway, as I've pointed out several times already, what you can find now is:

QUOTE
41. Why TM is offering unlimited packages & at the same time limits the amount of traffic?
Unlimited means that there is no time capping for user to access to the Internet and it does not mean that user can download/upload an unlimited volume of data.
http://www.streamyx.com/customer_care/cust...stomer_care_faq


QUOTE(almaty @ Mar 28 2010, 04:17 PM)
now if it were not tm or tmnets intention and consumers were construing it as such. why did they not take the initiative to spell it out clearly so it is unambiguous?
Because that is part of how marketing works. The unlimited term has been used as a marketing gimmick to entice consumers. You can see the similar issue in website hosting as well. This plays on the desire of consumers to get as much as possible and pay as little as possible.

QUOTE(almaty @ Mar 28 2010, 04:17 PM)
look at what is going on with unifi in the t&c again. tm reserves the right to implement FUP if you exceed the cap. BUT OH THEY FORGOT TO mention what exactly the penalties are. why?
I have not looked through Unifi website in detail. But for Streamyx, which may be similarly applicable to Unifi:


QUOTE
The Fair Usage Policy automatically identifies the extremely heavy users and manages their bandwidth in order to protect the service of all our other customers. This traffic prioritization policy will protect the quality of service for the majority of our customers when they use the service, while at the same time, still allowing the extremely heavy users to continue to send and receive files with certain restrictions. With this policy in place, we will prioritize Internet activities like web browsing, live streaming, messaging applications and VOIP access while traffic to P2P sites will be given lower priority, due to the high bandwidth consumption of such services.
http://www.streamyx.com/customer_care/cust...ir_usage_policy


QUOTE(almaty @ Mar 28 2010, 04:17 PM)
a few years back, TM said it was 20% using 80% of the bandwidth.
*
Maybe the 20% was at that time and now is down to 6%... ??


mylinear
post Mar 28 2010, 05:16 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(Maxieos @ Mar 28 2010, 05:06 PM)
http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?f...23&sec=business
Posted at koptiam , why can't it unbundled ?
*
Because they said other providers cannot just resell HSI, must have at least 2 service. If TM can sell HSI only, others also should be able to. Others may sell less than TM. TM may lose hold on Internet users due to competition. Competition like that good for consumers, but not TM.
mylinear
post Mar 28 2010, 05:30 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(silverhawk @ Mar 28 2010, 04:59 PM)
So basically they accept that users are greedy, bring them in then don't satisfy their greed? Now tell me, do they deserve the backlash they are getting? I tell you can get 2 cookies, but give you one, you have the right to complain no?

This is unscrupulous use of marketing, its dishonest and bad business practice. Do you not agree that its unethical for them to do so?
*
Any company doing unscrupulous business can be considered unethical. Should we also consider ourselves unethical when we want to be so greedy, inconsiderate to others, hog services etc etc?

This is not directed at you, I'm just making a general point below.

You know, I have seen posts on forums that go something like this:
I am sharing Streamyx with 4 others in my house. One of them is continously downloading stuff and thus I am not able to download as much as I want. That is unfair since we are all sharing the connection. Is there a way to restrict his usage in the router?

Amazingly, when you feel the effect yourself, you want to implement fair usage policy at home. Why? They are also paying their share. Why restrict their downloads? Because you are directly affected. But on the outside, you don't care how you affect others as long as you get what you want.



mylinear
post Mar 28 2010, 05:32 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(powerfulcool @ Mar 28 2010, 05:12 PM)
so shut it already with the cookies, apples or any other analogies you uncreative lot come up with.
*
I have used analogies in several of my posts to illustrate my points further. Sorry if you took any offence to them.


mylinear
post Mar 28 2010, 05:47 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(silverhawk @ Mar 28 2010, 05:31 PM)
The link has to come from somewhere, which means current streamyx users get even less. Heck, I'm pretty sure that the line isn't 100% dedicated to streamyx services unless you actually pay for such dedication. The line is definitely shared with a sharing ratio, otherwise it wouldn't be making full use of what they paid for. I won't be surprised if there's too much bandwidth request for streamyx, some of the traffic gets routed to HSBB's reserves.

*
They also have extra capacity to use from the AAG cable. I do not know how that is allocated though.


Added on March 28, 2010, 5:53 pm
QUOTE(silverhawk @ Mar 28 2010, 05:41 PM)
Is it right to be greedy and hog resources? No, of course not. However, if you play on people's greed, then you would get greedy people in your service, don't expect people not to be greedy when you enticed them with greed in the first place.
Yes, and in this case who wins? The one who enticed or the one that was enticed? It does seem in the long run it does not pay to be greedy... So if you have been bitten before, then be more wary of what you want to do next.

QUOTE(silverhawk @ Mar 28 2010, 05:41 PM)
Yes, that is greedy, but once again, its all about setting expectations and limitations, so people know what they are getting and whether it can be abused or not. I know some people when sharing connections, things get slow, they either come up with download schedules, or they just buy a faster line.
*
Yes, and maybe TM is more on the schedule method than buying new line method... Not saying that is right, but that seems to be the main complaint from users...



This post has been edited by mylinear: Mar 28 2010, 05:53 PM
mylinear
post Mar 28 2010, 06:16 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(silverhawk @ Mar 28 2010, 06:00 PM)
No one wins, everyone loses. People complain and get unhappy, company loses money in handling customer service and support, lose customers due to poor image. Customers have poor internet connection and lousy customer service as well.
In this case, how many Streamyx customers do you think TM has lost in the past year or so where there has been so many complaints about slow connections etc? I do not think that has affected TM much at all.

QUOTE(silverhawk @ Mar 28 2010, 06:00 PM)
It would all be solved from the company setting up expectations properly. Some friction and conflict upfront, but once that is resolved, things would be smoother from there. People who are greedy simply won't have anything to use, so they either get nothing, or re-evaluate their demands.
It also is the consumer's responsiblity to understand what can be expected of the service. Seriously, how many of us bothered to ask in detail about the advertised info, the FAQ info, the T&C info etc before signing up? Its mostly, read through, don't agree also sign up because need the service etc.

And maybe TM is now putting out the expectations early by advertising Unifi caps, though it has not gone down wel with a lot.

QUOTE(silverhawk @ Mar 28 2010, 06:00 PM)
Though if unifi increased their caps to 150GB for 5mbps at least, I would sign up smile.gif
*
See, this is just based on what you think is fair for you. Another user may want 300GB and another wants 500GB etc. Some may even be happy with 60GB. There could also be some who might not even use 30GB. There is no magic figure. Everyone here is throwing out numbers as if they know exactly what cap will be fair and not cause congestion etc etc. None of us knows that in reality. Its all based on what we wish to have.

mylinear
post Mar 28 2010, 07:02 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(almaty @ Mar 28 2010, 06:32 PM)
anyway, all im saying is $149 for 60Gb @ 5Mb/s is just not right.
*
Then let them know. Everyone should call 1 300 88 1222. Give them your feedback. Ask them to pass it on to the supervisor and management. There is no harm spending a little time to see if it has any effect.

I had already done this on 25th. I gave feedback on the capping issue. That was when I was told there would be no capping till end of the year. I posted somewhere here about that. The next day they said capping suspended due to user feedback. I don't know if that is actually true as I think they already were going uncapped until end of year anyway. Advertisement probably had capping as a precaution and an in-road to implement it down the line.

I also gave feedback on voice and IPTV. Asked why no HSI alone. Asked about how to sign a contract without all necessary info available. Said pricing could be lower and more affordable if it was HSI alone. Said that a lot of users are not signing up due to various of these issues.

Go ahead and call them. What harm can it do. Just maybe the feedback will go somewhere. At least then they will know why signups are not as many as they expected.

mylinear
post Mar 31 2010, 11:58 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(Enigmatic @ Mar 31 2010, 11:26 AM)
Wow, they just changed it. sweat.gif  shakehead.gif

Just yesterday they listed it was 5 cents per minute for TM to TM line call. Meh, should have screenshot.
*
It is possible it was just a mistake. The package graphics seems to have been changed and someone may have confused with the BIZ package details which are 5sen/min. Anyway, it is correct now.

This post has been edited by mylinear: Mar 31 2010, 11:59 AM
mylinear
post Apr 8 2010, 12:28 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(doomx @ Apr 7 2010, 02:35 AM)
when will it be implemented then ?
*
It has been said that the cap has been removed temporarily until end of the year.

mylinear
post Apr 8 2010, 01:02 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(James_yka @ Apr 8 2010, 10:19 AM)
Where did you get the news that it wont be implemented until end of year ?
*
I was told by customer service a day or so before TM announced in the media. TM says until further notice, or will not implement immediately or something similar though.

Call 1 300 88 1222 and see what they say. I was told that the cap will not be there until end of this year. Next year, they still don't know when it will be introduced. If introduced, they still don't know at what limits.

At this time, they have not said there will be no cap forever. They have left it open to have a cap. Its in their initial package adverts. There is of course a chance that there be no cap, but I think the chances are higher there will be one.

My guess is that there will be a cap either at the advertised limit or maybe higher to say its based on user feedback and usage. I doubt it will be lower than initially stated.

I also think they may charge more to remove the cap, eg pay RM50 extra per month and get without the cap. This will then come back to be the same as the RM199 BIZ5 package. So if you are a home user and you can get the BIZ5 package, this could be the reason why. The difference being in IPTV and voice call rates. It does not work the other way though.

mylinear
post Apr 15 2010, 11:56 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(KAHAK @ Apr 14 2010, 10:50 PM)
ok back to topic if example my bro(BOSS) have office streamyx 4MB want to get bizVIP5 can just add RM9 and get Unifi+IPTV?? drool.gif
*
The BIZ package does not have IPTV. AFAIK, offices cannot get VIP packages.

mylinear
post Apr 15 2010, 07:22 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(KAHAK @ Apr 15 2010, 04:16 PM)
get VIP10 MB  get IPTV?
*
Not sure what you mean. VIP packages has IPTV. BIZ packages does not.


Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0258sec    0.62    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 11:54 AM