QUOTE(jalan2 @ Apr 14 2010, 11:15 PM)
i think you don't understand economics, or the real world.
TM cannot just wire-up KL or Penang and just ignore everywhere else in Malaysia; as Hanzo explained.
If you have 2 parents (Family A) earning $200,000 & have only 1 child; compared to another family (B) where they earn $50,000 with 8 children, do you think these 9 kids have the same education & benefits? Surely the 1 rich kid (A) can afford Ipods, PS3, swimming at clubs,private school, etc. The other 8 kids (B) will have a totally different lifestyle.... or you think the parents can just help 1 kid & leave the other 7 kids with nothing??????
in other words, imagine TM only put fibre in KL & everyone in KL get 50mbs internet, but the rest of malaysia no need any wiring, no need phones, no need communication....?
That's what happen if you say "just compare any city in Malaysia to Singapore".... btw, you may not be aware that Singapore is a COUNTRY, not just a city.
As for China, if you're thinking of comparing KL (2 million) to Beijing (22 million) or Shanghai (17 million), of course the logistics & business opportunity makes it worth to invest billions in China where the potential customers is 10 times more. When Celcom first started business, they actually set-up telecom companies in China, where 1 small China city earn more revenue than the entire Malaysia. Even a "small city" like Shenzhen (by China standards) has over 8 million population... that's 400% bigger than KL, or 1600% bigger than Ipoh!
If you still don't understand basic economics & business logistics, i'm sorry you'll have to go somewhere else to learn this.........
I would like to think of parents of Family B under-reports their fortunes, spends their money in only god-knows-where, lie to their 8 children who they think are dumb, ask them shut up and always be thankful for what they have, threaten them with oppressive family regulations whenever the children questions them, never compare with better families, threaten their children to go to other families if they don't like it in B, incompetent, the list goes on...TM cannot just wire-up KL or Penang and just ignore everywhere else in Malaysia; as Hanzo explained.
If you have 2 parents (Family A) earning $200,000 & have only 1 child; compared to another family (B) where they earn $50,000 with 8 children, do you think these 9 kids have the same education & benefits? Surely the 1 rich kid (A) can afford Ipods, PS3, swimming at clubs,private school, etc. The other 8 kids (B) will have a totally different lifestyle.... or you think the parents can just help 1 kid & leave the other 7 kids with nothing??????
in other words, imagine TM only put fibre in KL & everyone in KL get 50mbs internet, but the rest of malaysia no need any wiring, no need phones, no need communication....?
That's what happen if you say "just compare any city in Malaysia to Singapore".... btw, you may not be aware that Singapore is a COUNTRY, not just a city.
As for China, if you're thinking of comparing KL (2 million) to Beijing (22 million) or Shanghai (17 million), of course the logistics & business opportunity makes it worth to invest billions in China where the potential customers is 10 times more. When Celcom first started business, they actually set-up telecom companies in China, where 1 small China city earn more revenue than the entire Malaysia. Even a "small city" like Shenzhen (by China standards) has over 8 million population... that's 400% bigger than KL, or 1600% bigger than Ipoh!
If you still don't understand basic economics & business logistics, i'm sorry you'll have to go somewhere else to learn this.........
I would say ending the monopoly would be a good start for a better infrastructure in the future.
Apr 15 2010, 07:44 PM

Quote
0.0285sec
0.64
7 queries
GZIP Disabled