Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

History The ULTIMATE World War II Thread, D-Day is Upon Us!

views
     
TSfrags
post Mar 22 2010, 06:38 PM, updated 16y ago

The Wizard
Group Icon
VIP
1,640 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


This thread is dedicated to the discussion of all things World War II. If you have a question on the politics, battles, weaponry, just about anything WWII, ask away here. This thread isn't about the promotion of any propaganda but merely an academic discussion. Yes you can discuss about nazi propaganda and the transformation of Germany. Just keep away from stereotyping groups of people and look at things in the context of that time period.

Let me start with this amazing propaganda film from propaganda master Goebbels. The famous Totaller Krieg(Total War) speech that inflamed the National Socialist party and plunged the world into a World War.




Added on March 22, 2010, 6:41 pmWinston Churchill's Battle of Britain speech.




Added on March 22, 2010, 6:51 pmA little documentary about the Spanish Civil War which was the prelude to World War II.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7aEG__LZ3g

Essentially a proxy war between the fascists, nationalist socialist party and communists.


Added on March 22, 2010, 7:08 pmHere are a few iconic photos of WWII.

The raising of the flag over Mount Suribachi at Iwo Jima
user posted image

The day which will live in infamy(Pearl Harbour)
user posted image

A famous photo of a Russian soldier raising the Soviet flag over the Reichstag after that Battle of Berlin
user posted image

This photo was identified as a doctored image much later:

QUOTE
Stepan Andreyevich Neustroyev commanded the battalion that stormed the Reichstag in 1945 and hoisted the flag over the building. This is one of the most famous images of World War Two and only in 1997 did it become known that the photo had been doctored. Photographer Khaldei had made the flag in the photograph himself from red tablecloths from Tass, the Soviet press agency, emblazoned with the Soviet hammer and sickle. Erich Kuby's book The Russians and Berlin, page 60, says:
It seems strange that the Russians should have looked upon the Reichstag, ... now an empty piece of masonry, its windows and doors bricked up, as the symbol of Germany. ... Mednikov describes this historic action in great detail:

"About noon on April 28 [1945], one of our battalions advanced on the Spree. At the same time the commander of the regiment, Col. F.M. Zinchenko, took charge of a red banner ... expressly set aside for planting on the dome. It was Red Banner No. 5 of the [150th Rifle Division] 3rd Shock Army ... [it was] twenty-three-year-old Capt. Stefan Andreyevich Noystroev men [who] battled their way into the building, fighting for every room and corridor. ... Noystroev ordered a shock detachment commanded by Lt. Berest to escort the two standard-bearers ... [who] took nearly half a day to reach the dome. At 10:50 p.m. on April 30, the banner of victory was unfurled over the Reichstag."


An MG42 gunner(German soldier) possibly taken in the Eastern Front campaigns.
user posted image


Added on March 22, 2010, 8:00 pmuser posted image

QUOTE
By nine in the morning, the sightseeing was finished. “It was the dream of my life to be permitted to see Paris,” Hitler told Speer. “I cannot say how happy I am to have that dream fulfilled today.”

A few hours later, Hitler spoke to Speer in the Führer field headquarters, a small room of a peasant house in Brûly de Pesche. “Draw up a decree in my name ordering full-scale resumption of work on the Berlin buildings...Wasn’t Paris beautiful? But Berlin must be made far more beautiful. In the past I often considered whether we would have to destroy Paris. But when we are finished in Berlin, Paris will only be a shadow. So why should we destroy it?” Hitler spoke with great calm, Speer remembered, as though the monstrous vandalism he contemplated was the most natural thing in the world.


Source: http://www.stevenlehrer.com/paris.htm

This post has been edited by frags: Jun 4 2010, 09:33 PM
noobfc
post Mar 22 2010, 09:11 PM

Peanuts
*****
Senior Member
753 posts

Joined: Jan 2008



i love hitler for his character but not his actions
Vengeance_Mad
post Mar 22 2010, 09:36 PM

Aston-ishing
*****
Senior Member
797 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


I seriously think Pearl Harbour is a conspiracy.
Intended to allow fellow AM3R1CAN0s to allow them to go to war with their allies.

I think they actually could've avoided it but...
Fatimus
post Mar 22 2010, 10:16 PM

(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
****
Senior Member
634 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kay Bee


I always see that Western Front has the most attention, I blame it on media.

Eastern Front (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_II))

EF features some of the brutal battles and few mistakes made by both Hitler and Stalin. However I can't help but feel amazed how the Soviet beat back the Blitzkrieg from the Krauts parked their army right in front of Moscow's door step in winter all the way to Berlin to end the war.

North Africa Campaign (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_African_Campaign)

Another lesser known campaign that pit British Commonwealth against the Afrika Corps.

Last but not least.

Pacific Campaign (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_campaign)

With US leading against the Imperial Japan. BTW HBO new mini series The Pacific, brought to you by makers of Band of Brothers, is now airing, currently on part 2.


Alone
post Mar 22 2010, 10:23 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
434 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Behind you O.O


The raising of the flag over Mount Suribachi at Iwo Jima

^ this should be the "fake" flag raising event. The real flag raisers were off deeper into the island killing each other by now. The new recruits raised this backup flag and kept the real one.
robertngo
post Mar 22 2010, 10:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,027 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(Vengeance_Mad @ Mar 22 2010, 09:36 PM)
I seriously think Pearl Harbour is a conspiracy.
Intended to allow fellow AM3R1CAN0s to allow them to go to war with their allies.

I think they actually could've avoided it but...
*
how to avoid the war, Japan will be attacking other US target just three day later when the offensive in south east asia started.
TSfrags
post Mar 22 2010, 10:25 PM

The Wizard
Group Icon
VIP
1,640 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(Fatimus @ Mar 22 2010, 10:16 PM)
I always see that Western Front has the most attention, I blame it on media.

Eastern Front (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_II))

EF features some of the brutal battles and few mistakes made by both Hitler and Stalin. However I can't help but feel amazed how the Soviet beat back the Blitzkrieg from the Krauts parked their army right in front of Moscow's door step in winter all the way to Berlin to end the war.

North Africa Campaign (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_African_Campaign)

Another lesser known campaign that pit British Commonwealth against the Afrika Corps.

Last but not least.

Pacific Campaign (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_campaign)

With US leading against the Imperial Japan. BTW HBO new mini series The Pacific, brought to you by makers of Band of Brothers, is now airing, currently on part 2.
*
The eastern front also featured the largest tank battle ever(I can't verify this though), Battle of Kursk.

German : 435,000 men
3,155 tanks
9,966 guns and mortars
2,110 aircraft

Russians: 1,087,500 men
3,275 tanks
25,013 guns and mortars
2,792 aircraft

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kursk

On the Russian strategy, they employed encirclement. Superior logistics, mobility to encircle and cut off German supply lines. The most famous and brutal demonstration of this was the Stalingrad battle in which they starved the Germans out.

user posted image
German Infantry men and a Tiger I tank.




Added on March 22, 2010, 10:28 pm
QUOTE(Alone @ Mar 22 2010, 10:23 PM)
The raising of the flag over Mount Suribachi at Iwo Jima

^ this should be the "fake" flag raising event. The real flag raisers were off deeper into the island killing each other by now. The new recruits raised this backup flag and kept the real one.
*
Yes I think this has been covered well enough. This was the dramatised version. There is the first flag picture floating somewhere in cyberspace. I'll post it up when I have found it.

This post has been edited by frags: Mar 22 2010, 10:45 PM
robertngo
post Mar 22 2010, 10:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,027 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(Fatimus @ Mar 22 2010, 10:16 PM)
I always see that Western Front has the most attention, I blame it on media.

Eastern Front (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_II))

EF features some of the brutal battles and few mistakes made by both Hitler and Stalin. However I can't help but feel amazed how the Soviet beat back the Blitzkrieg from the Krauts parked their army right in front of Moscow's door step in winter all the way to Berlin to end the war.

North Africa Campaign (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_African_Campaign)

Another lesser known campaign that pit British Commonwealth against the Afrika Corps.

Last but not least.

Pacific Campaign (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_campaign)

With US leading against the Imperial Japan. BTW HBO new mini series The Pacific, brought to you by makers of Band of Brothers, is now airing, currently on part 2.
*
The eastern front have more impact in turning the tide of the war, Hiltler obsession to gain living space for the master race in the east ultimately cause defeat for germany. and also he chosen the useless italian as his alien in europe, he need to bail out the italian several time.

BTW, The Pacific is awesome thumbup.gif
fyire
post Mar 22 2010, 10:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
VIP
9,270 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Somewhere out there
QUOTE(Vengeance_Mad @ Mar 22 2010, 09:36 PM)
I seriously think Pearl Harbour is a conspiracy.
Intended to allow fellow AM3R1CAN0s to allow them to go to war with their allies.

I think they actually could've avoided it but...
*
There's the arguments that the entire Pearl Harbor disaster could have been prevented, all the way down to arguments that the disaster was allowed to happen and so forth. But it still does not change the simple fact that the Japanese had been the ones making the attack. Whether the Pearl Harbor disaster as we all know it could have been avoided or not, war would have started anyways.
TSfrags
post Mar 22 2010, 10:39 PM

The Wizard
Group Icon
VIP
1,640 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(Alone @ Mar 22 2010, 10:23 PM)
The raising of the flag over Mount Suribachi at Iwo Jima

^ this should be the "fake" flag raising event. The real flag raisers were off deeper into the island killing each other by now. The new recruits raised this backup flag and kept the real one.
*
This is said to be the first raising of the flag over Mt Suribachi

user posted image

Source : http://www.angelfire.com/ca/dickg/IWO.html

This post has been edited by frags: Mar 22 2010, 10:49 PM
Fatimus
post Mar 22 2010, 10:52 PM

(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
****
Senior Member
634 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kay Bee


Ah yes Stalingrad. Anyone who is interested in the WW2's turning point, I recommend Antony Beevor's Stalingrad (Published by Penguin). So far I am halfway done, but it features extensive details of the war surrounding Stalingrad.
noobfc
post Mar 23 2010, 02:18 PM

Peanuts
*****
Senior Member
753 posts

Joined: Jan 2008



eastern front the most brutal war
ZeratoS
post Mar 23 2010, 08:00 PM

Oh you.
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: 127.0.0.1


QUOTE(Fatimus @ Mar 22 2010, 10:52 PM)
Ah yes Stalingrad. Anyone who is interested in the WW2's turning point, I recommend Antony Beevor's Stalingrad (Published by Penguin). So far I am halfway done, but it features extensive details of the war surrounding Stalingrad.
*
Enemy at the Gates captured the scenes pretty well. Vassili Zaitzev hmm.
JunWisewar
post Mar 25 2010, 04:12 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
45 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Penang, Bolehland


In Eastern Front, the so called invincible pan-European army led by the Nazi Germany become defeat-able. Thanks to the ferocity of the Soviet's resistance and counter-attack. Also inactivity of Imperial Japan against Soviet Union.


Hope people don't forget or belittle the role of the Soviet's heroic Red Army....
TSfrags
post Mar 25 2010, 02:19 PM

The Wizard
Group Icon
VIP
1,640 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(JunWisewar @ Mar 25 2010, 04:12 AM)
In Eastern Front, the so called invincible pan-European army led by the Nazi Germany become defeat-able. Thanks to the ferocity of the Soviet's resistance and counter-attack. Also inactivity of Imperial Japan against Soviet Union.
Hope people don't forget or belittle the role of the Soviet's heroic Red Army....
*
And also, we shouldn't forget the role Stalin played in the extermination of Polish prisoners of war. All of them murdered on the order of Stalin himself. One of the many atrocities during WWII.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre
JunWisewar
post Mar 25 2010, 03:49 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
45 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Penang, Bolehland


QUOTE(frags @ Mar 25 2010, 02:19 PM)
And also, we shouldn't forget the role Stalin played in the extermination of Polish prisoners of war. All of them murdered on the order of Stalin himself. One of the many atrocities during WWII.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre
*
Wonder why you bring this up....Any reason? Any motives? The usual steps of trying to negate the contribution of the Soviet Red Army in defeating the Axis? Or you dislike the truth that it was actually the heroic and notorious Soviet Red Army are the deciding factor of the Axis downfall? icon_idea.gif

Never let atrocities over-shadowed contribution and vice versa. Remember both of them. Soviet Red Army major contribution in defeating the Axis should not be brush a side just because of some atrocities committed by them. American GI also did terrible things but I don't see you post them up here.


Also, a decision of a sadistic man over-shadowed the contribution of the soldiers fighting for their motherland in the battlefront......tragic. sad.gif
TSfrags
post Mar 25 2010, 04:04 PM

The Wizard
Group Icon
VIP
1,640 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(JunWisewar @ Mar 25 2010, 03:49 PM)
Wonder why you bring this up....Any reason? Any motives? The usual steps of trying to negate the contribution of the Soviet Red Army in defeating the Axis?  Or you dislike the truth that it was actually the heroic and notorious Soviet Red Army are the deciding factor of the Axis downfall? icon_idea.gif 

Never let atrocities over-shadowed contribution and vice versa. Remember both of them. Soviet Red Army major contribution in defeating the Axis should not be brush a side just because of some atrocities committed by them. American GI also did terrible things but I don't see you post them up here.
Also, a decision of a sadistic man over-shadowed the contribution of the soldiers fighting for their motherland  in the battlefront......tragic.  sad.gif
*
Oh yes of course. But we must also remember all the atrocities. I do plan to post about all the atrocities done, Americans included. Hey they dropped the bomb remember. Sure we must remember the heroic as well as the those that died valiantly or tragically.

That's WWII. And hopefully we learn something from all this. Well we can hope.

PS : Some of the images I might post later might be NSFW, so a fair warning.
fyire
post Mar 25 2010, 04:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
VIP
9,270 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Somewhere out there
QUOTE(JunWisewar @ Mar 25 2010, 03:49 PM)
Wonder why you bring this up....Any reason? Any motives? The usual steps of trying to negate the contribution of the Soviet Red Army in defeating the Axis?  Or you dislike the truth that it was actually the heroic and notorious Soviet Red Army are the deciding factor of the Axis downfall? icon_idea.gif 

Never let atrocities over-shadowed contribution and vice versa. Remember both of them. Soviet Red Army major contribution in defeating the Axis should not be brush a side just because of some atrocities committed by them. American GI also did terrible things but I don't see you post them up here.
Also, a decision of a sadistic man over-shadowed the contribution of the soldiers fighting for their motherland  in the battlefront......tragic.  sad.gif
*
Funny you tried to equate a single comment about Stalin's background to the act of attempting to fully negate the contribution of the Soviet Red Army?

Whether you like it or not, Stalin does have his shares of atrocities way before WW2 even started, regardless of the role of the Soviet army in WW2.

It just so happened that Stalin's regarded as the lesser of the 2 evils when compared to Hitler. And in a way, you can also say that Hitler got more attention too because he decided to go WAAAAAARGH! (to borrow the Warhammer 40k Orks expression) first and rampage across Europe.


SUSCharkoteow
post Mar 25 2010, 04:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
225 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


I hate it when it comes to war and the allies killed some POWs, or innocent civillians they'll just say 'hey, it's war. people die.'
TSfrags
post Mar 25 2010, 04:44 PM

The Wizard
Group Icon
VIP
1,640 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


Operation Market Garden

One of the major epic fails of WWII. Bernard Montgomery spurred by his victory against the Desert Fox(Erwin Rommel), oversaw this operation.

user posted image

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Market_Garden


The site below has a really good pictorial account of operation market garden.
http://www.rememberseptember44.com/rs44.htm

QUOTE
Operation Market Garden (September 17–25, 1944) was an Allied military operation, fought in the Netherlands and Germany in World War II. It was the largest airborne operation of all time.[nb 3]

The operation plan's strategic context required the seizure of bridges across the Maas (Meuse River) and two arms of the Rhine (the Waal and the Lower Rhine) as well as several smaller canals and tributaries. Crossing the Lower Rhine would allow the Allies to outflank the Siegfried Line and encircle the Ruhr, Germany's industrial heartland. It made large-scale use of airborne forces whose tactical objectives were to secure a series of bridges over the main rivers of the German-occupied Netherlands and allow a rapid advance by armoured units into Northern Germany.

Initially the operation was successful and several bridges between Eindhoven and Nijmegen were captured. However the ground force's advance was delayed by the demolition of a bridge over the Wilhelmina Canal at Son,[7] delaying the capture of the main road bridge over the Meuse until September 20. At Arnhem the British 1st Airborne Division encountered far stronger resistance than anticipated. In the ensuing battle only a small force managed to hold one end of the Arnhem road bridge and after the ground forces failed to relieve them they were overrun on the 21st. The rest of the division, trapped in a small pocket west of the bridge, had to be evacuated on the 25th. The Allies had failed to cross the Rhine in sufficient force, and the Rhine remained a barrier to their advance until the offensives at Remagen, Oppenheim, Rees and Wesel in March 1945.


This post has been edited by frags: Mar 25 2010, 04:49 PM
JunWisewar
post Mar 25 2010, 11:17 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
45 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Penang, Bolehland


QUOTE(fyire @ Mar 25 2010, 04:05 PM)
Funny you tried to equate a single comment about Stalin's background to the act of attempting to fully negate the contribution of the Soviet Red Army?

Whether you like it or not, Stalin does have his shares of atrocities way before WW2 even started, regardless of the role of the Soviet army in WW2.

It just so happened that Stalin's regarded as the lesser of the 2 evils when compared to Hitler. And in a way, you can also say that Hitler got more attention too because he decided to go WAAAAAARGH! (to borrow the Warhammer 40k Orks expression) first and rampage across Europe.
*
Just wonder why frags suddenly post Soviet's atrocities just after I said people should also remember the role of the Soviet Union in WWII instead of remembering only the role of American in WWII. Maybe I've seen and met far too many people that blindly reject the important role of the Soviets and championing how "important and decisive" the American in WWII. So yeah, maybe a hasty and rash respond from me tongue.gif

Hope in this thread, we can get to share the bad and good side of all the nation that struggle in WWII

_____________________________________________________________________

Operation Market Garden another parallel failure of German's airborne invasion of Crete. laugh.gif




Fatimus
post Mar 25 2010, 11:34 PM

(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
****
Senior Member
634 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kay Bee


QUOTE(JunWisewar @ Mar 25 2010, 11:17 PM)
Hope in this thread,  we can get to share the bad and good side of all the nation that struggle in WWII

*
I think that was what frags did, perhaps it just the timing. I did mention that Stalin and Hitler made alot of mistakes in Eastern Front. As in Stalin's case, ordering his soldier not to react to German's invasion was just epic face palming. He even couldn't trust his source, moreover that time he just finished The Great Purge. The purge also left alot of inexperience officers confused, that was why the German can reach until Moscow's doorstep.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Purge


TSfrags
post Mar 27 2010, 04:37 PM

The Wizard
Group Icon
VIP
1,640 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


A little short history of the Nazi Party:

QUOTE
The Nazis grew out of a small right-wing party, which Hitler took over after 1919.   He developed a Twenty-Five Point Programme based on hatred, and built up a paramilitary group (the SA) to defend his meetings and attack other parties.
      
The Nazis appealed to a wide range of people, but especially the 'middling' sort of people, and the party grew rapidly in the years of crisis 1919-1923.

       After the disaster of the Munich Putsch, and during the prosperity of the Stresemann years, however, support for the Nazis fell.   During this time Hitler believed that he could be elected to power.   He used these years to develop and strengthen the party's organisation.




QUOTE
The German Workers’ Party, led by Anton Drexler, was formed in 1919.   Hitler joined and soon became leader.   His speeches gave people scapegoats to blame for Germany’s problems:
•      The Allies.
•      The Versailles Treaty and the ‘November Criminals’ (the politicians who signed it).
•      The Communists, and:
•      The Jews.


Src: http://www.johndclare.net/Weimar6.htm


Mein Kampf

QUOTE
And so it follows in Hitler's thinking, if there is a supreme form of human, then there must be others less than supreme, the Untermenschen, or racially inferior. Hitler assigns this position to Jews and the Slavic peoples, notably the Czechs, Poles, and Russians.

"...it (Nazi philosophy) by no means believes in an equality of races, but along with their difference it recognizes their higher or lesser value and feels itself obligated to promote the victory of the better and stronger, and demand the subordination of the inferior and weaker in accordance with the eternal will that dominates this universe." - Hitler states in Mein Kampf

Hitler then states the Aryan is also culturally superior.

"All the human culture, all the results of art, science, and technology that we see before us today, are almost exclusively the creative product of the Aryan..."


Src: http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/kampf2.htm




This post has been edited by frags: Mar 27 2010, 04:47 PM
JunWisewar
post Mar 28 2010, 12:09 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
45 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Penang, Bolehland


Good video, frags thumbup.gif


TSfrags
post May 27 2010, 04:47 PM

The Wizard
Group Icon
VIP
1,640 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


Remembering Dunkirk

The Battle Of Dunkirk begined on 26th May 1940 marked the beginning of Hitler's dominance of Europe. The British, French and allied forces having failed to defend France against the Nazi invasion, fell back to the beaches of Dunkirk. There they were seiged by Hitler's forces and rescue boats were attacked by the Luftwaffe. A desperate moment in British history, many civilians joined together with the navy to help bring back the boys.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunkirk_evacuation
QUOTE
On the first day, only 7,010 men were evacuated, but by the ninth day, a total of 338,226 soldiers (198,229 British and 139,997 French)[2] had been rescued by the hastily assembled fleet of 850 boats. Many of the troops were able to embark from the harbour's protective mole onto 42 British destroyers and other large ships, while others had to wade from the beaches toward the ships, waiting for hours to board, shoulder-deep in water. Others were ferried from the beaches to the larger ships, and thousands were carried back to England by the famous "little ships of Dunkirk", a flotilla of around 700 merchant marine boats, fishing boats, pleasure craft and Royal National Lifeboat Institution lifeboats—the smallest of which was the 15-foot fishing boat Tamzine, now in the Imperial War Museum—whose civilian crews were called into service for the emergency. The "miracle of the little ships" remains a prominent folk memory in Britain.


The evacuation was spun as a major victory and British propaganda labeled it as the Dunkirk Spirit.




Still the best damn WWII documentary:


Of course this was the time also when Churchill delivered his famous speech 'We shall fight on the beaches'.

This post has been edited by frags: May 27 2010, 04:58 PM
SUSmylife4nerzhul
post May 27 2010, 05:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
270 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
imma just put this here:

The 5 Most Widely Believed WWII Facts (That Are Bullshit)



TSfrags
post May 27 2010, 05:11 PM

The Wizard
Group Icon
VIP
1,640 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(mylife4nerzhul @ May 27 2010, 05:00 PM)
Pretty obvious stuff. I find it hard to imagine anyone would say any one of those is a fact. Maybe people who are ignorant and have no idea about WWII.
ComposMentis
post May 28 2010, 04:27 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
420 posts

Joined: May 2010
interesting thread
liking it smile.gif
robertngo
post May 28 2010, 10:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,027 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


just watch this movie Days of Glory, interesting movie about the often forgotten french north african troop, the troop from these colony go to france to fight for a country they never seen and receive discriminatory treatment by the french commander. even though they make up large part of the free french force that liberated france.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Days_of_Glory_%282006_film%29
SUSDeadlocks
post May 30 2010, 02:10 PM

n00b
*****
Senior Member
943 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(mylife4nerzhul @ May 27 2010, 05:00 PM)
Haha, my favorite site too. That is of course, until people accuse us of falling into the conspiracy trap by the Americans in a form of a comedy web site! LOL! laugh.gif
MisterCrono
post Jun 2 2010, 10:47 AM

Non-halal troll
****
Senior Member
635 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Malaysia > Singapore


Wow, surprisingly there's a history thread here esp WWII hahah



Guys, here's an interesting book to recommend for all the history lover =)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C5%82awomir_Rawicz

http://www.amazon.com/Long-Walk-True-Story...m/dp/1558216847


Quick Summary

"A story of one man and his seven companions escaping a Russian work prison and walking to freedom. The book covers their trek of over 3000 miles to India. This book is epic in scope even though it's only 240 pages long. "
Anthony Harris, Resident Scholar



"This story was written by one man who with six other prisoners escaped from a Soviet prison camp in Siberia. They walked thousands of miles to escape through harsh wasteland. Half the group perished."
, Resident Scholar



"The trek from Moscow to the upper India border lasted over eighteen months. Slav and his fellow escapees went through torturous degrees of human degradation. Through help and friendship, the men come together and make it out of the Russian prison camp to freedom. Over three thousand miles and harsh conditions made the going very tough.
These men crossed the Gobi dessert and the Himalayan Mountains and survived the frigid temperatures of the Siberian wilderness. Lice were a major problem to the men. Language barriers in Mongolia and Tibet were cumbersome. Slav and his companions had to rely on the kindness of strangers to provide them with a roof and food sometimes.

In the desert land of the Gobi, they went up to twelve days without drinking water, when they finally found liquid to drink, it was muddy and rancid, giving the men diarrhea. The men were toughened by the amount of grief they went through. "




I read through this article at Discovery Channel Magazine back few issues. Found it quite interesting, then I bought it at Borders Time Square for about rm7x. I don't know whether it's expensive or not as for me it is coz i'm not a regular book buyer. smile.gif
TSfrags
post Jun 4 2010, 09:33 PM

The Wizard
Group Icon
VIP
1,640 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


It's D-DAY!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normandy_landings

QUOTE
The Normandy landings were the landing operations of the Allied invasion of Normandy, also known as Operation Neptune and Operation Overlord, during World War II. The landings commenced on Tuesday, 6 June 1944 (D-Day), beginning at 6:30 AM British Double Summer Time (UTC+2). In planning, D-Day was the term used for the day of actual landing, which was dependent on final approval.

The assault was conducted in two phases: an air assault landing of 24,000 American, British, Canadian and Free French airborne troops shortly after midnight, and an amphibious landing of Allied infantry and armoured divisions on the coast of France commencing at 6:30 AM. There were also subsidiary 'attacks' mounted under the codenames Operation Glimmer and Operation Taxable to distract the German forces from the real landing areas.[4]

The operation was the largest amphibious invasion of all time, with over 160,000[5] troops landing on 6 June 1944. 195,700[6] Allied naval and merchant navy personnel in over 5,000[5] ships were involved. The invasion required the transport of soldiers and materiel from the United Kingdom by troop-laden aircraft and ships, the assault landings, air support, naval interdiction of the English Channel and naval fire-support. The landings took place along a 50-mile (80 km) stretch of the Normandy coast divided into five sectors: Utah, Omaha, Gold, Juno and Sword.




 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0249sec    0.66    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 09:25 PM