Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
REIT V2, Real Estate Investment Trust
|
2010May
|
Apr 24 2011, 08:43 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(darkknight81 @ Apr 24 2011, 08:37 PM) First, you must know why you buy reits. You buy for its dividend not for speculating purposes. Therefore, i think the risks that you mentioned above are not applicable for REITS. Reits Risks are for example : 1. Interest Rates Risk 2. Tenants renewal Risk 3. Occupancy Risk Earthquake and tsunami is also a kind of risk. I would name it as "Catastrophic Risk". I think the delay of Axis Global listing is also due to 2 of the property affected by recent Tsunami / Earthquake and hence both of the 2 property is being taking out of the IPO now. So can you still say Catastrophic risk is not applicable to REITS? (What happens if few of the REIT property is destroyed in Tsunami? Can you get your dividend? The REIT may only get some general insurance claims if they bought insurance included catastrophic risk.) This post has been edited by 2010May: Apr 24 2011, 08:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010May
|
Apr 24 2011, 09:56 PM
|
Getting Started

|
1 of the example for REIT that almost being affected by landslide 3 years ago. http://savebukitgasing.wordpress.com/2008/12/05/lol (luckily nothing happened to the building although the tragedy was just beside it) This post has been edited by 2010May: Apr 24 2011, 09:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010May
|
Apr 24 2011, 09:59 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Evening @ Apr 24 2011, 09:57 PM) Then invest in Malaysia Reit will be most safety since our country a free from the above disaster . No matter invest in what kind of investment, every investment got it own risk . Eg. Earthquake & tsunami at Japan, not only affected the REIT, but it do reflected the whole world market as well . No investment got the guarantee profit.  Malaysia is quite safe but not truly all property safe. Look at the example above and you can see that it can expose to landslide risk. It is still okay that the REIT having diversified property (different location in Malaysia). So even if the building in Damansara Heights being destroyed should be still not a big problem. This post has been edited by 2010May: Apr 24 2011, 10:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010May
|
Apr 24 2011, 10:14 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(cherroy @ Apr 24 2011, 10:05 PM) Huh? This still need to ask? Properties damaged, then claim building related insurance, mostly building do have, even apartment. All things are susceptible for catastrophic risk even ordinary listed company premise, your own business, your house etc. This doesn't need to be specific mentioned, it is common sense.  Usually property damage due to catastrophic event is not included in usual general insurance because insurance company do not willing to give protection without higher premium. So if a building being destroyed due to earthquake while the company insurance do not include earthquake protection, then the owner of the building will not get any claims from insurance.
|
|
|
|
|