Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
13 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Nikon D90 v6

views
     
celciuz
post Mar 17 2010, 08:13 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(luzzio @ Mar 17 2010, 08:02 AM)
Yeah it's always been a wonder to me why most hobbyists like us lust after 70-200's =p
*
I know, it is called peer pressure laugh.gif . It is my friend's fault for lending me that VR II and then causing me to be in love with the optics >(
celciuz
post Mar 17 2010, 09:13 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Mar 17 2010, 08:33 AM)
But imo, artistic wise, it boils down to the photographer and not the lens or even camera body.

Cropping, PP, great angles etc etc from a creative photographer will make pics look artistic.

Nikon 1424 f/2.8, 2470 f/2.8, 70200 f/2.8, 200mm f/2, 300mm f/2.8 etc are workhorses for working photographers in their field of work. Wedding photogs will tend to need the first three lenses and wildlife/sports will tend to need a much higher range than 200mm.

I do hope to get some of those lenses to use for my wedding shoots...the 2470 is reallly sharp even at 2.8.. tried it. The all rounder lens for an FX body.

So it boils down to "Need VS Want"....do u need it or do u just want it?
*
thumbup.gif

QUOTE(shadow111 @ Mar 17 2010, 08:42 AM)
IMHO... if i like the lens and i can afford it, i will buy it..
do agree with what alpha said.. everything boils down to "need vs want".. most of the time, we choose something becoz of wanting it rather than the needing it.
celciuz statement about peer pressure is an example of want..
smile.gif
*
Of course, most of us here I'm sure does not 'need' any of the gears they're using it now. It is just for hobby and leisure instead of doing photography as a profession and taking photo is your main income. laugh.gif Pst, if this goes on, might as well say use a point and shoot instead of a DSLR tongue.gif. So basically, get what you can afford and like. No rules saying newbies can't use expensive lens, nor professional photographer using cheaper lens can't take good pictures.
celciuz
post Mar 17 2010, 09:59 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Mar 17 2010, 09:56 AM)
Currently my kit lens can gaotim most of my photography as well, but will get 50mm f/1.4 soon too tongue.gif
*
Same biggrin.gif, 18-105 will still be my multipurpose lens. Its a good and versatile lens smile.gif.
celciuz
post Mar 17 2010, 10:23 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(shadow111 @ Mar 17 2010, 10:18 AM)
why dont you get  Nikon 50mm f/1.8D? heard most ppl said this is a cheap but good lens.
i plan to get it this weekend... any comment on it? thanks.
*
Cheap and good laugh.gif . Only complain I have is the lack of VR, but then again the IQ is pretty good, it is lightweight and best of all does a lot of bokeh hehe. But my hit rate is pretty bad when I go below 1/30s shutter >(.
celciuz
post Mar 17 2010, 10:30 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Mar 17 2010, 10:26 AM)
Then Nikkor 50mm F/1.4G is for you, although no VR too but at least you can increase your shuttle speed with extra aperture tongue.gif
*
Alamak, don't poison me further. I'm satisfied with 50mm f/1.8D! cool.gif
celciuz
post Mar 17 2010, 01:33 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Mar 17 2010, 01:13 PM)
Teehee, 8 Eneloop batteries and charger reached doorstep already tongue.gif
*
Nice set of battery, that's what I'm using too rclxms.gif
celciuz
post Mar 18 2010, 10:30 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
70-200 VR already discontinued I think, and the price is about 500-600 differences. Most likely people will got for new one due to the VR capability.
celciuz
post Mar 18 2010, 11:52 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(zackskate666 @ Mar 18 2010, 11:21 AM)
what i mean in term of 2nd hand lor..2nd hand i can get around the price of 4.8k...but to bought it,i need to sold of 3 of my lens..so,its not a wise thing to do although i have in hand another cam, d90 kit(my gf one,but reside inside my dry box,so like im owning it oso la)..hehe..its either a 17-55 or 70-200 nikkor...what say u guys??..which will u choose??
*
70-200 assuming I have the 18-105 kit lens laugh.gif
celciuz
post Mar 19 2010, 02:11 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Backup unit, must be pretty good condition if not like new leh!.
celciuz
post Mar 19 2010, 04:41 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(hackerzx @ Mar 19 2010, 04:40 PM)
Hot balloons in Putrajaya..come2 shoot!~
*
Exciting events are always not in Melaka >(. But I've GACC on Sunday to invade xD!
celciuz
post Mar 19 2010, 05:26 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(hackerzx @ Mar 19 2010, 04:59 PM)
but i always pray to be in Melaka.. a lot place maa actually there wink.gif either before this 2years in Jasin..but still not enough i think huhu  blush.gif

p/s plan to get prime lens..any suggestion  rclxms.gif
*
Still ok la... I prefer to shoot events =/

QUOTE(alpha_company @ Mar 19 2010, 05:05 PM)
Sadly the new 70200 VR2 version does not come in white nor does the 24-70

The old 70200 f/2.8 VR and 28-70 f/2.8 does come in white...and it looks really cool.

fyi, there's still a new 28-70 white version in penang..  brows.gif

user posted image
*
Wow! Nice... But then I prefer black.. Pure Dark Sider here doh.gif.
celciuz
post Mar 19 2010, 06:19 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Mar 19 2010, 05:28 PM)
Is even better in shape, size & colour over canon's white 70200 & black 2470

I read somewhere this guy doing a comparison and saying that the Nikon 2470 (not white la...) is better optically than the canon's version.
*
24-70 the new one is sharp! Tested on the D3s + 24-70. But didn't try the 24-70 of the Canon on a FF tho.

QUOTE(alpha_company @ Mar 19 2010, 05:38 PM)
Im a dark sider too..but it doesnt hurt to really stand out among the dark siders...

There is a prob though with large lenses being black in colour. The lenses will heat up really fast outdoors in the sun..

here is a quote from a guy on flickr...:

"Anyway, this lens is known as the "Great White" like a shark. Secondly, or thirdly for those who are counting, the reason lenses (mainly Canon) choose to design and produce white lenses, and mainly in the longer focal lenghts, is/are for those shooters who are outdoors and in rough and very extreme hot conditions. As you all know, black attracts heat more then white. I've personally seen a 300mm Æ’/4 warped from the heat and it's not pretty. If you're serious about photography and protecting your equipment either buy this lens is white or put a white foam cover over it."
*
Warped? Is it in the desert or something? That seems like really extreme heat to me. I'll melt before my lens warp tho.
celciuz
post Mar 20 2010, 08:26 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Mar 19 2010, 06:26 PM)
Warped doesnt mean that the lens melt like water..but maybe the guy meant the plastics was kinda bent in a way and lose the original shape..


Added on March 19, 2010, 6:29 pm

Yeah... i tested the 2470 on a D3... it was awesome and really sharp.. even wide open at 2.8.. WOW! on a D3s.. makes carrying a speedlight optional...hehe  drool.gif
*
Oh I was thinking those lens like 70-200 with metal frame warped... errk. Since those white lens are usually the long tele which are always built with metal frame.
celciuz
post Mar 21 2010, 10:09 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
edwardgsk, I'm probably close to you there. LOL. I've a picture of him at similar location, not sure same time or not.

user posted image
celciuz
post Mar 21 2010, 11:04 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Must go again today, this time gonna ask them already. Yesterday went with my bunch of friends not very interested in cosplay one sad.gif.

And also to try out my new toy xD

user posted image

This post has been edited by celciuz: Mar 21 2010, 11:09 AM
celciuz
post Mar 22 2010, 12:04 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Mar 21 2010, 11:40 PM)
Damn kaya, today indoor shots i din use flash also sad.gif
*
Indoor not too dark, but still need flash~! I wanted it specially for fill light.

QUOTE(General_Nic @ Mar 21 2010, 11:42 PM)
he can afford 70-200 VRII, dun play play leh  tongue.gif
*
And eat roti for the following days >( sweat.gif
celciuz
post Mar 22 2010, 06:52 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Mar 22 2010, 01:02 AM)
celciuz, u still at melaka right?? Tomorrow we go yamcha and i wan borrow ur gear play laugh.gif
*
I'll be at Station 1 Melaka Baru along with my friends, not sure if I'll be going back home after work or straight go there. Usually I don't bring my gears one haha, but should be another VR II at the gathering.
celciuz
post Mar 22 2010, 09:20 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(shadow111 @ Mar 22 2010, 09:14 AM)
can i know what's the main diff btw photoshop n lightroom?
plan to get one n learn how to use it. which will be easier and more suitable to be used? thanks.
*
Can put it this way, Photoshop -> manual, Lightroom -> semi-auto biggrin.gif.

Lightroom can basically do most of the things an average photographer would want to do on their pictures. Straightening, exposure, contrast etc. But if you wanna do something more detailed like 'make up touch up' for portrait, you'll need photoshop.
celciuz
post Mar 22 2010, 03:14 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 22 2010, 02:56 PM)
Lighroom can do so much more than what you mentioned sleep.gif
*
Can do much more of course sleep.gif, I never said that's the only things Lightroom can do.
celciuz
post Mar 23 2010, 12:58 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(hosiery2u @ Mar 23 2010, 12:38 PM)
I'm, planning to get Nikon D90, but now i dilemma, the shop keep asking me to buy Canon 550D or 50D over Nikon D90, said Canon is made in Japan while Nikon is made in Thailand, and Nikon service is slow and expensive while Canon service is fast and cheaper, even accessories Canon cheaper than Nikon.
*
The exact same thing I faced, but in the end I took D90 over 40D/50D. Don't worry, despite being made in Thailand, Nikon build seems better than Canon's made in Japan build.

13 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0464sec    0.64    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 11:30 AM