compare with LCD ... is worth itLCD or plasma?, present for parents...
|
|
 Mar 9 2010, 11:50 AM
|
 
Junior Member
11 posts Joined: May 2006  
|
Plasma most more cheaper
compare with LCD ... is worth it |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Mar 9 2010, 02:01 PM
|
Senior Member
6,059 posts Joined: Feb 2010 From: Cheras, Kuala Lumpur   
|
QUOTE(moffatts @ Mar 9 2010, 11:50 AM) Plasma most more cheaper Can you name one cheap Plasma Tele.. compare with LCD ... is worth it  |
|
|
Mar 9 2010, 08:49 PM
|
Junior Member
317 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
QUOTE(jitbeng @ Mar 8 2010, 07:02 PM) I am a Senior & I choose a Plasma 42". Thanks for the reply but why didn't burn in bothers you? Did you notice any visible burn in?In my opinion Plasma PQ for Astro is good & the colour is also natural. I did not choose LCD because I feel the PQ for Astro is not so good as compare to Plasma. Also the colour is not natural, kind of artificial. Picture too sharp for my eyes, kind of like "cutting" my eyes. My eyes are not as good as when young. Touch wood they are ok with some floaters & slight cataract. By the way I am not worry at all about IR/Burn-In for Plasma. Thanks |
|
|
Mar 9 2010, 10:39 PM
|
Senior Member
14,193 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Sbn / KL
|
Pana will be launching its new plasma models very soon. Samsung will also intro its new models too.
|
|
|
Mar 9 2010, 10:51 PM
|
|
Junior Member
317 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
Yup, read the news. Perhaps just bring them to the shop and choose. Problem solved
|
|
|
Mar 9 2010, 11:59 PM
|
Junior Member
997 posts Joined: Apr 2009
|
QUOTE(jitbeng @ Mar 8 2010, 07:02 PM) I am a Senior & I choose a Plasma 42". True...sokong sokong.... many who had used Plasma and compared to LCD, especially on Astro, the picture quality is good to the naked eye.In my opinion Plasma PQ for Astro is good & the colour is also natural. I did not choose LCD because I feel the PQ for Astro is not so good as compare to Plasma. Also the colour is not natural, kind of artificial. Picture too sharp for my eyes, kind of like "cutting" my eyes. My eyes are not as good as when young. Touch wood they are ok with some floaters & slight cataract. By the way I am not worry at all about IR/Burn-In for Plasma. Thanks Personally I prefer Plasma too, its backed by a 40 yrs old technology compared to infact but fast growing technology....its the future but its just not there yet...hence best bucks worth would be Plasma. The Burn-in (IR) is no more an issue with latest Plasma as they have mechanism to refesh it. This post has been edited by Maknusia: Mar 10 2010, 12:00 AM |
|
|
Mar 10 2010, 12:03 AM
|
|
Junior Member
997 posts Joined: Apr 2009
|
QUOTE(sKyWiR3pT3lTd @ Mar 9 2010, 02:01 PM) Can you name one cheap Plasma Tele.. A 50 " plasma cost lesser than LCD...exampleSamsung 52" LA52A610 = RM 7590 Panasonic 50" TH-P50S10K Plasma = RM 5399.00 |
|
|
Mar 10 2010, 12:11 AM
|
|
Junior Member
997 posts Joined: Apr 2009
|
QUOTE(VSX-AX2as @ Mar 9 2010, 08:23 AM) Plasma will give you more consumption.SO you must limited watching it Not soo true with current version of PLasma, as some of then even comes with energy star rating now. For example, 52" LCD consumes about 190w and on Plasma it would be about 250w. Memang Plasma menggunakan eletrik yang lebih tapi taklah tinggi sangat. |
| Change to: |  0.0170sec
 1.00
 5 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 05:24 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.