Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The University of Nottingham - Malaysia Campus v3,, Best University in Malaysia so Far

views
     
exzau
post Jul 31 2010, 04:15 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(zstan @ Jul 31 2010, 12:37 PM)
what you mean how did that happened?

notts was ranked lower than monash all these years.

p/s: monash's website isn't very user friendly as well.  :sweat:  :sweat:
*
you are probably referring to Times-QS ranking where monash is ranked at 45 while nottingham is at 91 (http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2009/results) but this ranking is misleading as it focuses heavily on surveys and peer reviews (fake)

ARWU ranking is more established and accurate as it focuses on research output and quality of professor. Here, nottingham is ranked at 83 while monash is at 201-302.
exzau
post Jul 31 2010, 04:35 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(rubrubrub @ Jul 31 2010, 04:17 PM)
do u have the link for ARWU?
*
link to arwu: http://www.arwu.org/ARWU2009.jsp

this is how qs-times calculate their rankings: http://www.topuniversities.com/university-...simple-overview

this is how arwu calculate it: http://www.arwu.org/ARWUMethodology2009.jsp

compare for yourselves
exzau
post Jul 31 2010, 05:50 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(zstan @ Jul 31 2010, 05:16 PM)
lolz. that survey is 100% based on academics which is unfortunately not quite suitable in todays world.

we are talking more about graduate attributes, about high employment rates of students who graduated from that uni.

not how many Nobel Prize winners that uni has. 20 marks for this criteria. astounding. having a Nobel Prize winner does not guarantee quality education for the students.


* For institutions specialized in humanities and social sciences such as London School of Economics, N&S is not considered, and the weight of N&S is relocated to other indicators.

see, these rankings dun even cover those aspects.  what? means LSE is bad because it does not have scientific research?

on the other hand, if you wanna look at research and work in the acedemic field for the rest of your life, then yes, please follow that arwu rankings.

having Nobel prize winners and whatever award holders as your lecturers will certainly make a lot of difference in your thesis and research work..


Added on July 31, 2010, 5:18 pm

not only times.

entryman has posted few other ranking bodies in his previous posts and monash outranks nottingham in general.
*
half of the qs ranking is based on online survey and nobody really knows what the sources are and the result can easily be faked/biased.

-http://research.qsnetwork.com/qs_surveysystem/index.php?viewonly&order=normal&partnerset=0&survey=52&jump_to_section=3

from the above webpage you can see QS-times ask for research quality in the peer review survey too (40%), but this is very inaccurate as there is no data backing it up, just a personal "feeling".

Here is a direct quote from the webpage:

"Please select up to thirty universities from our international list that you "regard as" producing the best research in the XXX subject area"

And I don;t see how faculty:student ratio (20% of the ranking) can denote quality. Simply having more lecturers does not make a university good (quantity ≠quality) An addition 10% is made up of international faculty and students. If they all come from, say Africa, then it will also be included in the ranking and no way does this reflects how "internationally" attractive it is.

You talk about graduate attributes which can no way be reflected from these rankings. Research/nobel prize means innovation, and having Nobel prize winners and whatever award holders as your lecturers probably means having a higher chance that creative graduates would be produced.


Added on July 31, 2010, 5:56 pm
QUOTE(zstan @ Jul 31 2010, 05:16 PM)


Added on July 31, 2010, 5:18 pm

not only times.

entryman has posted few other ranking bodies in his previous posts and monash outranks nottingham in general.
*
I didn;t catch this the first time. QS-Times and Arwu are the two most popular rankings that are mostly reffered to.


This post has been edited by exzau: Jul 31 2010, 05:56 PM
exzau
post Sep 21 2010, 12:28 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


is the induction programme really important? i plan to skip it but not sure if that would give me any trouble.
exzau
post Sep 24 2010, 01:12 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


Does anyone know where to get the student ID and timetable? I did not attend the induction.

Thanks.
exzau
post Sep 24 2010, 06:23 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(stpmmaths @ Sep 24 2010, 01:31 PM)
Student ID is at your receipt/Invoice which you obtained during your Registration/Enrolment.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Your mail box should have the timetable  smile.gif
*
sorry, i mean student id card
exzau
post Sep 26 2010, 11:17 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


does anyone know where to get the student id card and timetable (not in my email) thanks.
exzau
post Sep 27 2010, 05:37 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


does anyone know how to fill up the forms- introductory info form and module entry form?
I missed the induction.

thanks.
exzau
post May 15 2011, 06:33 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


does anyone know if we need to get more than 40% in both exam and coursework to pass a module or just 40% overall. For example in a 50-50 module, the mark for coursework is 65% while exam is 15%, is this still a pass?

thanks.
exzau
post Jun 21 2011, 02:22 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


is anyone else's transcript channel gone suddenly?
exzau
post Jun 22 2011, 12:21 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


the transcript tab is finally back. does anyone know how to calculate the average grade based on different credits. I have 5 20 credits subjects and 2 10 credits ones. Do you divide the grade for each 10 credit subject by 2, then add them together to weight it equally to a 20 credit subject?

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0454sec    0.73    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 04:05 PM