Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Xigmatek League, ElYsiUm ! Video Review Page 5

views
     
selferino
post Mar 11 2010, 09:30 AM

joe cole = english samba!
******
Senior Member
1,219 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
any compilation of cons u can giv me on the xigmatek utgard? still wondering whether 2 get these or lancool k62 smile.gif
selferino
post Mar 12 2010, 09:57 AM

joe cole = english samba!
******
Senior Member
1,219 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
QUOTE(beast921 @ Mar 12 2010, 01:05 AM)
Let based from the site:

Lancool K62

&

XIGMATEK UTGARD

Dimension:

Lancool K62 =  214mm x 496mm x 498 mm (W, H, D) / Price RM345

UTGARD      =  207(W) x 515(H) x 490(D) mm / Price RM309

Both Casing came with pre installed rear, front & top fans
Both casing design PSU allocate at the bottom.
Both casing design with so called "screwless installation in certain part"
Both casing design with liquid cooling Holes
Both casing desing with Transparent side windows
Both Casing design with Dust filter at the bottom (psu bay)
Both Casing design with Front mesh grill.

Slightly addtional is on UTGARD is the 2 knobs Fan Controller (can control 6 fan) + 4 USB port on the front O/I panel.
HDD panel/Bay :

UTGARD its slightly conservative & use " HDD in three 5.25" bay adapter, while Lancool K62 with much prefer HDD bay. (but that depend on user preference)

In term of price: UTGARD is slightly cheaper that Lancool K62.

I can't really give significant Con's on either Chasis. its Just that price comparison, UTGARD slightly had the advantage.
*
how bout build quality? its thw pci-e slot as strong as the one in lancool k62? is the construction of the lancool k62 strong?
selferino
post Mar 12 2010, 09:40 PM

joe cole = english samba!
******
Senior Member
1,219 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
i ahve checked the Utgard at viewnet b4, looks like tthe HDD area(near the intake fan area) at below of the case, looks like gonna be no so good airflow the coz they look quiet stuffy there, in my opinion tat is. but i guess tat woulkd not be a problem if u have an extra below intake fan in the Utgard, coz i think k92 doesnt have below intake, only 1 intake at the front.


Added on March 12, 2010, 9:41 pm
QUOTE(happyfamily @ Mar 12 2010, 04:04 PM)
going to buy a CPU cooler
which 1 would u guys recon?
XIGMATEK Dark Knight
or
XIGMATEK Balder?
*
plz bring this question at the xigmatek thread thr at the hardware section, this thread is only casing discussion, tq.

This post has been edited by selferino: Mar 12 2010, 09:41 PM
selferino
post Mar 16 2010, 06:22 AM

joe cole = english samba!
******
Senior Member
1,219 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
[quote=beast921,Mar 13 2010, 12:18 AM]
[quote=selferino,Mar 12 2010, 09:40 PM]
i ahve checked the Utgard at viewnet b4, looks like tthe HDD area(near the intake fan area) at below of the case, looks like gonna be no so good airflow the coz they look quiet stuffy there, in my opinion tat is. but i guess tat woulkd not be a problem if u have an extra below intake fan in the Utgard, coz i think k92 doesnt have below intake, only 1 intake at the front.

please refer to the screenie below:

[attachmentid=1480159]

my UTGARD currently running with :
1x12cm Front intake
1x12cm bottom intake
1x12cm Rear exhaust
1x17cm Top Exhaust

my CPU cooler is Killerwhale with 1x12cm CM 90CFM led fan.
*

[/quote]
ah, ok, any chance the case will bend or wutever a.k.a bad build qualiity?
selferino
post May 14 2010, 11:03 PM

joe cole = english samba!
******
Senior Member
1,219 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
QUOTE(cmgan72 @ May 14 2010, 10:03 PM)
i would prefer utgard. it has fan controller. biggrin.gif

it looks more like Lancool K58 instead of CM690 II sweat.gif
*
wuts so bad bout cm 690 II?

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0155sec    1.11    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 09:05 AM