Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V37!, The Orange Legion

views
     
scph50004
post Feb 23 2010, 12:03 AM

Für die lulz
****
Senior Member
692 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Soviet Sarawak


sifus... need some advice... i'm looking for cheap macro and wide angle lens to pair with my a330... any recommendations on where to buy or which lens to get?
scph50004
post Feb 23 2010, 01:12 AM

Für die lulz
****
Senior Member
692 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Soviet Sarawak


QUOTE(albnok @ Feb 23 2010, 12:26 AM)
finejava: Welcome back!

#1 is a lot duller than #2, why is that? Like #3 but #4 could've been far more zoomed/cropped. #7 from a lower angle and nearer point exaggerates size.

lwliam: Nice! Where was this?

braindead_fr3ak: Hmmm, I am not feeling your closeup shots. #2 needs fill light to the eyes stat. #3 looks like a wedding shot.

wingster: Wow! That is something you don't see every day.

alex_cyw1985: Nice #1 but #2 should be shot from directly in front to get a consistent pattern. Crop #4 to a square. #9 also from direct in front better. Other shots not so interesting.

achew: Not quite feeling it for the wallet shot or the portrait. Portrait is shot with a long lens hence the people in the background are nearly the same size as her.

hazril: Good shot, albeit overexposed.

Sheep319: The bokeh and slant does not make it look appetizing.

e-jump: Nice! This is what the Sigma 28mm F1.8 is made for - closeups that look real. (Of course, stopping down would've helped.)

scph50004: Cheap macro - Sony 30mm F2.8 DT Macro SAM - around RM7xx. Meant for food and product macro, not the insect kind of macro. Cheap wide is the Samyang 8mm F3.5 diagonal fisheye for RM12xx. biggrin.gif

VeRoN_7: Interesting #1 but the choice of background is very important to making that kind of effect.

#3 is almost there, try a different flower.

#4 is fresh, well done! Very unique and you have caught the fountain in almost its best colors.
*
thanks for the reply bro... looks like i'm gonna have to eat grass for the next few months already... sweat.gif

scph50004
post Feb 23 2010, 01:21 AM

Für die lulz
****
Senior Member
692 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Soviet Sarawak


QUOTE(wingster @ Feb 23 2010, 01:20 AM)
if really wanna have an entry-level of Macro lens ... well there weren't available but the Macro Lens Adapter ... Raynox 250 may serve you for macro photography in a more budget way ....
*
thinking about that as well... can i use that on any telephoto lens? including my SAL1855 kit lens? how does it work?
scph50004
post Feb 23 2010, 04:01 AM

Für die lulz
****
Senior Member
692 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Soviet Sarawak


QUOTE(wingster @ Feb 23 2010, 01:27 AM)
if not mistaken it can be use on the lens filter sizes from 52mm until 67mm

yeah SAL1855 can be used as well but I think when equip it .. is good to use between 35mm~50mm range
*
ooh alrite... made up my mind to get it already... thanks for the advice... smile.gif
scph50004
post Feb 23 2010, 11:58 AM

Für die lulz
****
Senior Member
692 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Soviet Sarawak


QUOTE(kevinwcw @ Feb 23 2010, 05:50 AM)
1870 will be  biggrin.gif ...juz kidding...actually you can look for sigma 17-70 2.8(macro)
*
ooo thanks for the recommendation... but gonna buy raynox DCR250 for now... any recommendations for reasonably priced wide angle lens?
scph50004
post Feb 23 2010, 12:43 PM

Für die lulz
****
Senior Member
692 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Soviet Sarawak


QUOTE(noprob @ Feb 23 2010, 12:05 PM)
just got raynox too , am enjoying it..
uwa rm1.9-2.2k
*
fuiyoo i no need uwa actually... just started using alpha so something cheap is enough... i'm considering SAL-28F28... is it good?
scph50004
post Feb 23 2010, 01:16 PM

Für die lulz
****
Senior Member
692 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Soviet Sarawak


QUOTE(shootkk @ Feb 23 2010, 01:06 PM)
The 28mm focal length is NOT WIDE when used on an APS-C body which is what the A3xx range of body is. Try turning your kitlens to 28mm and look through the viewfinder. Do you find that to be wide?

On an APS-C you would need somewhere around 16mm focal range to be considered wide. 18mm on your kitlens is acceptable as wide but I personally prefer the 16mm on APS-C.

You could try the 11-18mm for a UWA but that lens is not cheap. Wide angle and ultra wide angle lenses never come cheap.
*
i see... thanks for the advice! sticking to my kit lens then... or buy the samyang 8mm fish eye lens from cjlai... tongue.gif

This post has been edited by scph50004: Feb 23 2010, 01:18 PM
scph50004
post Feb 23 2010, 09:57 PM

Für die lulz
****
Senior Member
692 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Soviet Sarawak


QUOTE(noprob @ Feb 23 2010, 09:50 PM)
My first Macro Shot ..

user posted image
*
nice... what weapon u use? smile.gif

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0415sec    0.44    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 07:00 AM