Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V37!, The Orange Legion

views
     
neo_lam
post Mar 12 2010, 10:25 PM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


i am greedy at all..i want one 85ZA and thts enough for me now!!
neo_lam
post Mar 13 2010, 12:58 AM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(alex_cyw1985 @ Mar 13 2010, 12:46 AM)
jp sites always makes me proud to me an Alpha user....
neo_lam
post Mar 13 2010, 10:29 PM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


any TT for the coming weeks??
neo_lam
post Mar 14 2010, 10:06 PM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(kevinwcw @ Mar 14 2010, 09:00 PM)
thinking for very good potrait lens...looking for 135z or 85z
*
for apsc 85mm would do the great job...but in terms of IQ 135mm is the king of portrait!!
neo_lam
post Mar 14 2010, 11:32 PM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(kevinwcw @ Mar 14 2010, 11:15 PM)
hmm...big diff for the IQ?
*
agree with wat William said..they are on par just get the focal length u need...
i tested with these two lens i will stick with 85mm coz of the size and weight...
neo_lam
post Mar 15 2010, 12:26 AM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(0168257061 @ Mar 15 2010, 12:20 AM)
eh, SAL85/1.4 cant be same performance to the 135/1.8 in terms of IQ ? 
85mm is an ideal range for portrait also  biggrin.gif
*
they are almost on par....just you will have big aperture in 85mm than 135mm...
neo_lam
post Mar 15 2010, 12:45 AM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(ieR @ Mar 15 2010, 12:30 AM)
well, first... ignore the reviews... but read the cons and pros... and read more cons and pros on every website.... and imagine, the cons,... does it exists on other and older bodies. and does that matter?

A100 is a kinda, old camera, with several generation of technology gap to A550.


either u find it too long, or too short.

sony user has so much advantages and argues bout 85 and 135... sony user usually will find 135 much nicer with ease to use. (due to SSS and 135 at 1/30 also no problem... sharp)

other brand, they prefer the 85... F1.8~(most favorable) is better choice... due to the all primes has no VR or IS, which at times, 135 at slow shutter is not an option as it might shake too much.

when comes to arguement on this both lens... each has their own better uses. when u use it one a 24mp sensor, the pixel is soo much, that is hard to compare IQ
*
yeah...recently i read some discussions and found out Sony is quite clever...they chose the best focal length and quality and present to its customers...
so a 85 an 135 are enough while wat we need is a cheaper version... tongue.gif
neo_lam
post Mar 15 2010, 01:22 AM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(ieR @ Mar 15 2010, 01:06 AM)
hahaha, cheaper ah? this one i also no comment hahahaha...

KM 135 F2.8 got, around 1.3-1.6k... rare lens. if 135 F2.8, i might save more money go for 70200G which cover the range and sharpness too
*
actually for casual users they always wish to have 85mm f1.8 version....cheap and nice to use...

neo_lam
post Mar 15 2010, 09:10 PM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(kevinwcw @ Mar 15 2010, 08:09 PM)
maybe i juz dont like sony didnt apply the magnesium body and large vf in the latest a550 and a500 and also the infrared sensor
*
coz they have to differentiate the level between a5xx and a7xx....magnesium body should only be found on semi-pro until pro body...
neo_lam
post Mar 15 2010, 09:12 PM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(Mikeshashimi @ Mar 15 2010, 09:11 PM)
i feel that the a100 falls short on higher ISO. as well as advanced tech like auto-HDR,larger megapixels, smile shutter and stuff. however, i do feel honestly, the a100 feels more solid on hand compared to the a550.
*
wat bout a700?? can try it too...
neo_lam
post Mar 15 2010, 09:28 PM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(Mikeshashimi @ Mar 15 2010, 09:23 PM)
@neolam: thats what i want to do but i dont think i can find an a700 to try. haha.

@banzai: sorry, but whats IR? tongue.gif i do intend to keep my a100 IF i do upgrade.
*
wait for TT and u can try...anyway, there is no need to try a700 coz it is very solid and nice to use...
neo_lam
post Mar 15 2010, 09:51 PM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(Mikeshashimi @ Mar 15 2010, 09:34 PM)
sorry for asking soo much, but what makes a700 better than a550?
*
a700 got better body(quality and control) and handling , bigger VF....
for picture quality i dint do any comparison but a550 high ISO have slightly better performance...
for low ISO i think they are almost on par...


Added on March 15, 2010, 9:51 pm
QUOTE(achew @ Mar 15 2010, 09:45 PM)
watermark was done in cs4 sometimes ago....the pattern at the bottom was from a brush..

as for the reflection..orig was very very faint..so i make it slightly more obvious digitally..
*
bro..bought yourself any nice games??

This post has been edited by neo_lam: Mar 15 2010, 09:51 PM
neo_lam
post Mar 15 2010, 10:11 PM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(kevinwcw @ Mar 15 2010, 10:03 PM)
yea i knoe...if coming with semi pro sure above rm3.5k  biggrin.gif
*
i think more than rm4k....

QUOTE(achew @ Mar 15 2010, 10:06 PM)
playing FF13 now...after than GoW3....
*
GOW3 is the last of the series...so have to pay more attention to it...
neo_lam
post Mar 15 2010, 10:18 PM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(kevinwcw @ Mar 15 2010, 10:17 PM)
in retail price... biggrin.gif
*
yeah...mayb the street price is like 3.5K to 4K...or mayb higher!!
neo_lam
post Mar 15 2010, 10:23 PM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(Braynumb @ Mar 15 2010, 10:21 PM)
want to organize TT since I'm in KL this week. Any sugestion of places in KL where we can meet up n easy for me to reach with trens? Sugested time should be around 6pm n above. On thursday. Coz mite b meeting with milenia3000 on that day, so, mite as well do a TT. Plans n sugestions, PM me!
*
thursday?? sadly tht day not in KL... shakehead.gif
neo_lam
post Mar 15 2010, 10:39 PM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(kevinwcw @ Mar 15 2010, 10:25 PM)
anyways....technology is keep improving ...keep the better lens first.. tongue.gif
*
yeah..i will still stick with a700 now(unless i suddenly crazy and buy a a850)...next would be Distagon 24mm!!!
neo_lam
post Mar 15 2010, 10:44 PM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(kevinwcw @ Mar 15 2010, 10:40 PM)
[attachmentid=1484652]
*
wat a set of seducing glass...24*1.5=36mm on APSC...suitable for many type of shots...
neo_lam
post Mar 15 2010, 10:50 PM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(kevinwcw @ Mar 15 2010, 10:45 PM)
but 2.0 wor..enuf?
*
yeah...it is...with f2 just very easy to get ur subject in focus if it has a certain distance withe background....
for example, a Zeiss 50mm Plannar f2....

user posted image

This post has been edited by neo_lam: Mar 15 2010, 10:53 PM
neo_lam
post Mar 15 2010, 10:59 PM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(lwliam @ Mar 15 2010, 10:56 PM)
but i thought its not accurate to compare a lens on a rangefinder? ie. M9?
*
i know but in terms of bokeh there are not too much difference...it is M9!!!
neo_lam
post Mar 15 2010, 11:03 PM

Player
******
Senior Member
1,921 posts

Joined: May 2006


QUOTE(cjlai @ Mar 15 2010, 11:01 PM)
dun think this bokeh is nice smile.gif

it looks noisy
*
ya..just wanna show kevin even f2 could do quait amount of bokeh...

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0424sec    1.37    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 06:47 PM