no HDMI 1.4 how?

IMHO, black level cannot replicate the awesomeness of large screen effect..

with normal 42-50inch plasma you are still reminded you watching TV.. of course that's why anfielddude got a huge 60incher

---

Added on January 23, 2010, 10:30 pmwhat dead pixel??

This post has been edited by ar188: Jan 23 2010, 10:30 PM

got ar?

never heard of them on current projectors..

3years old.. LCD.. 720p.. no stuck wor..

why would current one get stuck when previous gen don't have this problem..

if you saying LCD Tv got stuck pixel, that's also very rare now..

if you say so

which model? yes, it;'s super irritating.. sorry to hear that...

I think quite rare.. their QC should be very good.. manufacturer would reject the chip before using them?

i wonder who

below 10k ?

reading more details on the new 3D glasses technology, it may require a transmitter from the TV to control the active shutter on the glasses.. (hence why pana giving away 2 glasses with their new 3D TVs, not to mention HDMI 1.4 required for FULLHD 3D)... if that is the case, I think not very attractive to spend so much (5figures) on old TV models liao..

it's coming the specs are just finalized, you don't need to wait 2-3years to mature... it's just an extension of AVC codec.. and the rest is add-on hardware like apeture glasses amd HDMI 1.4...

as for the reference of BD, well I bought I started buying 2008, it didn't take long to go from HDMI 1.0 to HDMI 1.3.. or BD x1 to BD x8.. or BD profile 1.0 to BD profile 2.0..

another thing to ponder is will your whole HDMI supply chain (amp/BDplayer/what not) be compromised and stuck at 1.3 profile for the next 5years, if have to use the TV for 5 years due to ROI again due to high investment cost?

I'm not sure if everything drops to the lowest version for HDMI? anyone can confirm?

if you can upgrade TV every 2-3 years, I don't see why not.. go get it.. (I doubt 3years time KRP-500 will be so hot.. like how 428 was great in 2007 )

for me, buy low-middle range and change every 2-3years.. sorry la.. poor fellas is like this wan..

elites buy new Kuro (or it's replacement model, top of the range Series) every 2years??

This post has been edited by ar188: Jan 25 2010, 06:41 PM

I think yours abit different, you choose 60incher.. (if not mistaken panny still sell older 60incher series even if the newer ones like 42-50 are being replaced right?) so maybe 2years time your Kuro 60 still considered (mid high end) among 60inch sold in local market.. (but maybe prices for these bigger sizes will tumble more, am not sure??)

however, 50" is more common... so maybe the 500A will be obsolete sooner.. anyway my remarks was more "optimized" for 42- 50inch TV.. cos the models change much faster and every change brings more features and cheaper price.. (with respect to how 42inch top range 10k model 3years ago is probably beaten by a 5-6k TV now)


(besides you won't be gloating at me getting a newer 60incher than yours.. I'm sure it's still pricey, relative to 42-50inchers, even in 2years later.. )

again poor fellas like me cannot venture out of the cost effective mass market product range..

This post has been edited by ar188: Jan 25 2010, 07:36 PM

Vizio famous in US leh.. in few years become leader in TV market in US..

you won't be saying that if they have it here and they were selling it at 60% of equivalent feature LCD brands.. local dimming LED etc..

---

Added on January 26, 2010, 11:21 amsay is katak but got 950 samsung and submersive wor..

This post has been edited by ar188: Jan 26 2010, 11:21 AM

but submersive is like aston or bentley of subs wor.. so you got both worlds..