--Undervolting Notebook Processor--, Only for Core 2 Duo below..
|
|
 Jan 24 2010, 05:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
3,749 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Johor   
|
QUOTE(Eugene91 @ Jan 24 2010, 02:13 PM) RMClock really isnt working quite perfect on Windows 7 u can see spike of stock clocks even with undervolted clocks.. =.= although one of the NBR did mentioned it does happens as Windows 7 is newer than RMClock latest release.. and he mentioned shud be no problem lol.. Is there any solution up to date? |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2010, 03:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
3,749 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Johor
|
Notebook/Laptop Model: HP Compaq C769TU
Processor Model: Intel Core Duo T2370 @1.73Ghz, 533MHz FSB, 1MB L2 Cache, 65nm Stable Undervolted Voltage: FID:6.0x VID:0.9500V , FID:13x VID:0.9500V However, CPU-Z shows a constant voltage at 1.063V |
|
|
Jan 27 2010, 03:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
3,749 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Johor
|
QUOTE(lee_what2004 @ Jan 27 2010, 03:15 PM) but did the temp go down or remain same? It does. Previously using ORTHOS to stress the CPU the highest temperature recorded was 89-91 degree celcius. It dropped to about 79 degree celcius now. The temperature is so freaking high, wouldn't it destroy the CPU? |
|
|
Jan 27 2010, 06:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
3,749 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Johor
|
QUOTE(Eugene91 @ Jan 27 2010, 05:05 PM) At least you got it cooler But there is a lot of room to go. Any idea what's preventing the voltage from going lower? Or it's just the reading of CPU-Z is wrong? |
|
|
Jan 27 2010, 09:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
3,749 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Johor
|
Just verified that cpu-z 1.5.1 reported wrong voltage but 1.5.3 showed 0.950v which matched the value I set in RMClock 2.35
|
|
|
Jan 27 2010, 11:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
3,749 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Johor
|
QUOTE(Eugene91 @ Jan 27 2010, 10:00 PM) lucky u checked.. lol So there isn't any way to lower the voltage further? I think there is still a lot of headroom for my processor. It can probably be lowered to the level of a ULV. |
|
|
Jan 29 2010, 10:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
3,749 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Johor
|
QUOTE(Eugene91 @ Jan 29 2010, 10:23 PM) Just got these.. Trying it Does this mean that the processor will always run at highest frequency? When using RMClock on Windows 7 this need to be done: in RMC in Management disable OS power management integration in W7 in power plan in Minimum processor state set 100% and now RMC is taking control of processor and Windows 7 of the rest |
|
|
Jan 29 2010, 11:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
3,749 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Johor
|
QUOTE(Eugene91 @ Jan 29 2010, 10:44 PM) Dont look like it.. Oh... I don't see any voltage spikes at all before following the instructions here. However, I have a serious frequency spike though. Mine still downclocks.. I dont see anymore spikes to Stock Voltages..As long as in RMClock's Profile you have set to performance on demand(Current and Startup) i think.. With all indexes ticked.  My CPU hardly stabilize. |
| Change to: |  0.0545sec
 0.90
 8 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 03:38 PM |
Quote