QUOTE(felixwang @ Aug 12 2011, 06:06 PM)
FYI, EPF is also a good investment fund with a balanced asset allocation of equity, bonds and property. Since EPF has a mandate of providing its members with a minimum return of 2.50% pa, hence, a large portion of its fund is invested in both private bond and MGS, which yields a lower return than the rest of the assets.
If you intend to derive a better return from your savings in EPF, the next option is to move your savings from EPF to an equity fund. Otherwise, I do not see the point of paying a service fee of 0.25% by moving your fund from EPF (most of the fund is in bond) to a private bond fund.
From one bond to another bond? Furthermore, you will be charge again when you switch from the private bond fund to a private equity fund at FULL rate even via DCA. That would be a double charge.
Wow...another Wang sifu.
I understand your points here and fully aware of it. Thanks for sharing.
The reason of having this idea is because EPF doesn't provide much flexibility in terms of the withdrawal. Members are only allowed to make withdrawal every 3 months. It may take up to a maximum of 21 days from the application date to transfer the money to fund manager. When this happened, I might miss the golden opportunity to buy at low NAV.
I know what you going to say next is with DCA, I don't have to care about the NAV.

Added on August 12, 2011, 11:15 pmQUOTE(shanelai @ Aug 12 2011, 11:00 PM)
i doubt on asset manager of PM... From 1st day public of fund until now. the price i bought for PCIF is low from 25sen to 19 sen.. It never been up b4 during the few years invested. I wonder if i should take it out and invest myself in stock exchange.
In fact, most of China themed funds by PM are not performing well since launch. I have been holding PCIF since the launch date. I almost break even before the recent market downturn. I was planning to exit and switch to a better performing fund at that time but God is not helping me.
This post has been edited by milentechie: Aug 12 2011, 11:15 PM