Public Mutual v2, PB/Public series
Public Mutual v2, PB/Public series
|
|
Apr 28 2010, 10:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,820 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL/Singapore |
Been invested in lousy pm - PCIF, price keep decrease and never distribute any dividend for years..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 28 2010, 10:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,660 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
@shanelai
I always have poor perception towards Public Mutual Fund Managers especially on their China Funds (PCSF,PCIF...). I had this fund before and sold it off - All. |
|
|
Apr 28 2010, 11:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
shanelai, I still have PCSF with me.
|
|
|
Apr 29 2010, 10:49 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,053 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Stop monitoring =) |
When is dividend given? How do I know when it is given? How to choose payout or reinvest?
|
|
|
Apr 29 2010, 11:01 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
57 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
|
|
|
Apr 29 2010, 01:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
It depends on the fund policy. Most of the funds are incidental. Funds like PFEDF and PAIDF (dividend funds) are committed to pay distribution on annual basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 29 2010, 05:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,053 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Stop monitoring =) |
Where can I know about more regarding the dividend of fund's I've invested?
|
|
|
Apr 29 2010, 05:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
|
|
|
Apr 29 2010, 06:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,820 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL/Singapore |
|
|
|
Apr 29 2010, 09:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Apr 29 2010, 11:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
664 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
Yes, dunno why PCSF still cant 'go up'!:)
|
|
|
Apr 30 2010, 01:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,457 posts Joined: Jul 2005 |
the purpose of unit trust is to beat inflation ... so must keep for long ...
not play contra like share |
|
|
Apr 30 2010, 01:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,820 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL/Singapore |
Need to find a good timing to sell off then.... hm....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2010, 02:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,177 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
In my case, I've learned not to rely on Public Mutual's funds that invest outside Malaysia. I find that their domestic funds earn very steady returns but there is a lot of variation between their foreign funds. It makes sense too. I trust Public Mutual to be knowledgeable about the Malaysian market but do I trust Public Mutual to have enough skilled analysts to be knowledgeable as well on US, China etc. stocks? I think not.
I think if you want to invest in a foreign country it is better to try to find the best unit trust fund for that country that is based there directly. Of course, this is only feasible if your investment amounts are large enough. |
|
|
Apr 30 2010, 02:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
QUOTE(wankongyew @ Apr 30 2010, 02:25 PM) In my case, I've learned not to rely on Public Mutual's funds that invest outside Malaysia. I find that their domestic funds earn very steady returns but there is a lot of variation between their foreign funds. It makes sense too. I trust Public Mutual to be knowledgeable about the Malaysian market but do I trust Public Mutual to have enough skilled analysts to be knowledgeable as well on US, China etc. stocks? I think not. Not necessary, many foreign investment funds can be invested with a minimum of either 1,000 USD or 1,000 SGD. I think if you want to invest in a foreign country it is better to try to find the best unit trust fund for that country that is based there directly. Of course, this is only feasible if your investment amounts are large enough. |
|
|
Apr 30 2010, 06:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,932 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
It doesn't look like PM has any "feeder" funds, ie you buy a PM fund which buys into other foreign managed funds.
That way, it would suite those investors who want a foreign managed fund, and yet deal through a local company. I haven't read through the details of every fund, so I could have missed something. |
|
|
Apr 30 2010, 07:39 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
QUOTE(howszat @ Apr 30 2010, 06:16 PM) It doesn't look like PM has any "feeder" funds, ie you buy a PM fund which buys into other foreign managed funds. Feeder funds are not worth it, as the investor pay double layer fees. Furthermore, using a feeder fund, the fund house actually earns less than they run the fund themselves. If you want foreign funds might as well buy from them directly and save on your cost? That way, it would suite those investors who want a foreign managed fund, and yet deal through a local company. I haven't read through the details of every fund, so I could have missed something. This post has been edited by gark: Apr 30 2010, 07:41 PM |
|
|
Apr 30 2010, 07:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,932 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
QUOTE(gark @ Apr 30 2010, 07:39 PM) Feeder funds are not worth it, as the investor pay double layer fees. Furthermore, using a feeder fund, the fund house actually earns less than they run the fund themselves. If you want foreign funds might as well buy from them directly? There would be some additional hidden fees, but I don't expect it would be significant or anywhere up to "double". In fact, as far as initial charges are concerned (for the ones I know), it's exactly the same as what the fund house would charge. The fund house may earn less, but then they don't have to do anything more than channeling the funds to another party who would be making all the investment decisions.If you were to decide on a foreign fund, the main criteria should be how much the fund can potentially outperform the local funds (at least say 5% more) rather than the 0.5% you can save on fees. Fees are insignificant when you put these things into context. Lastly, some investors may prefer dealing with local companies rather than some foreign websites, and to them that is worth a lot more than any percentage numbers we can put on fees. |
|
|
Apr 30 2010, 08:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
QUOTE(howszat @ Apr 30 2010, 07:59 PM) Well if you read correctly, I mentioned double layer fees and not 'double' the fees. Typical charge of a feeder fund is 1.5% due to the external fund and 0.3% due to the local fund manager. On average the total management fees is >2%. Initial cost is usually between 5% to 6% charged by the local fund manager but if you invest direct overseas you only pay 1%-2%. Also you must consider the cash lag, in which typical feeder funds holds between 2% to 5% and some until 10%. Every percentage of cash holdings is the difference in the performance. I have analyzed most of the feeder funds in Malaysia vs. their actual foreign funds and there are noticeable differences in the return, therefore decided to invest directly with them. Also most of the foreign funds the feeder funds invest in are not the best of it's class and quite poor performing except one or two. Also we must consider the flexibility and fund choices available for external funds. For example if we looking for emerging bonds, there are only 2-3 feeder funds to choose from and usually the best of the funds are not available, but with foreign investment i can have a choice of >10 funds to choose from including those highly rated ones. |
|
|
Apr 30 2010, 08:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,932 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
QUOTE(gark @ Apr 30 2010, 08:20 PM) Well if you read correctly, I mentioned double layer fees and not 'double' the fees. If you read correctly, I put "double" in quotes. That means don't interpret it too literally.Typical charge of a feeder fund is 1.5% due to the external fund and 0.3% due to the local fund manager. On average the total management fees is >2%. Initial cost is usually between 5% to 6% charged by the local fund manager but if you invest direct overseas you only pay 1%-2%. Also you must consider the cash lag, in which typical feeder funds holds between 2% to 5% and some until 10%. Every percentage of cash holdings is the difference in the performance. I have analyzed most of the feeder funds in Malaysia vs. their actual foreign funds and there are noticeable differences in the return, therefore decided to invest directly with them. Also most of the foreign funds the feeder funds invest in are not the best of it's class and quite poor performing except one or two. Also we must consider the flexibility and fund choices available for external funds. For example if we looking for emerging bonds, there are only 2-3 feeder funds to choose from and usually the best of the funds are not available, but with foreign investment i can have a choice of >10 funds to choose from including those highly rated ones. The point about fees is really only one of many factors. The point should be how much you expect to get in hand, ie actual returns after all the fees and charges, and after all the non-tangible factors like dealing with local companies etc, the invester makes his/her decision. True, there is a limited choice of feeder funds. But one is obviously not limited to feeder funds, only. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0300sec
0.30
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 07:39 PM |