i always thought feng shui is based on the recommended place to build your house in ancient times

i.e, it must be at a place of good air circulation, feng (wind) as you dont have fan or air con then (and it can get hot in summer). it must also be at a place of easily available water from spring, river, lake, or well (shui) as they dont have modern piping, tanks, and pumps.

everything else is bs.

citation please

again, some fact to base your findings on. what you think is logical is not necessary true. some observation is required showing T-houses have higher accident date than non T-houses. while i dont doubt your logic, its just that
1. the care need to experience brake and/or steering failure;
2. this failure need to occur on a straight road leading to the house atthe junction
3. the driver cant control care properly to stop/evade

given that in most housing area, only residents will be traveling on the road, the speed is relatively slow, modern cars generally experience very few sudden mechanical faulure, etc etc.

it is likely that the accident rate of T houses are only a fraction of a percentage higher than non T-houses for most (a negligible value)

please understand the meaning of "negligible" before saying surely is higher. also there is no proper study showing that T-houses experiences more accident than non T-house

how is astrology/bazi/palm reading/face reading/bone groping/entrail reading/tea leave reading/tulang nujum/etc more believable than feng shui?

traditional medicine (unlike fengshui) is often testable and researchable. plenty of scientific test has been done on some traditional medicine. try doing that to fengshui.

that the thing, where is the basis? is that basis testable?

and no, if you think an atom/electron is a very tiny sphere, you have not studied enough. that sphere model is a simplified version that is shown/proven to work at macro levels. rest is in quantum mechanics.

my personal peeve is when people extrapolate their lack of knowledge onto science and make it look like existing science facts is false. when it is proven to be false the science community will the the 1st to publish an addendum, thank you very much.