Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Panasonic New New Line Up, Diffrent Between S and U Series....

views
     
anfieldude
post Jan 13 2010, 03:20 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,858 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(daryl.k @ Jan 13 2010, 03:05 PM)
honestly, i'm not sure if its a good or bad thing, being as exclusive as Kuro...

on one hand, Kuro was like the elite of plasma displays...they dun hv any 'lower' range or entry models...hence giving utmost exclusivity & giving its proud owners a high sense of elite-ness smile.gif

one another hand, sad to say, that's why Kuro went kaput...

with panny, even if i can afford its V or Z series, not sure if i will feel as 'elite' as if i were to own a Kuro...probably becos i know there are lower range of panny plasma displays...

in a way, anyone from noob to elite can afford a Panasonic Plasma tv (series aside)...but only the true elites can have a Pioneer Kuro...

but on second hand, panny able to survive & keep making plasma displays...but at least, they can share some of their Kuro expertise into all range of 2010 lineup...
*
The important thing is not about being elite or noob.

The most important thing is if a company as big as Panny can truly deliver more that Pioneer ever could.

Panny used to put out the best screens out there till 2007. They have slacked. Hope they get their act together else they will also wash away with the LCD revolution.

Also, if u do not see the difference and u r happy with ur entry level set, why worry about wanting a better set. Its elite as long as the owner is happy with the product.

Having a Kuro and not being able to appreciate that is better but merely feeling that he/she has the best set is really not important.

Thats the point I am making.

I have got calls to calibrate Kuros, but the person uses it to watch pirated DVDs and low res stuff. Why buy one for that?
Panny has better people at management, thats why they are so big. Pio was badly managed and they have gone bust in the display industry. They made a big mistake of buying a wrong plant and backing it.

My point is Panasonic needs to pull up its socks and improve, get back to being the leader they once was. The strong fight put out by the LCD camp cannot be ignored.
daryl.k
post Jan 13 2010, 03:34 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
467 posts

Joined: Feb 2007


QUOTE(anfieldude @ Jan 13 2010, 03:20 PM)
The important thing is not about being elite or noob.

The most important thing is if a company as big as Panny can truly deliver more that Pioneer ever could.

Panny used to put out the best screens out there till 2007. They have slacked. Hope they get their act together else they will also wash away with the LCD revolution.

Also, if u do not see the difference and u r happy with ur entry level set, why worry about wanting a better set. Its elite as long as the owner is happy with the product.

Having a Kuro and not being able to appreciate that is better but merely feeling that he/she has the best set is really not important.

Thats the point I am making.

I have got calls to calibrate Kuros, but the person uses it to watch pirated DVDs and low res stuff. Why buy one for that?
Panny has better people at management,  thats why they are so big. Pio was badly managed and they have gone bust in the display industry. They made a big mistake of buying a wrong plant and backing it.

My point is Panasonic needs to pull up its socks and improve, get back to being the leader they once was. The strong fight put out by the LCD camp cannot be ignored.
*
tho i'm no expert, at least i can still see the clear difference of Kuro vs rest of the lineup....it really gives you the shocking.gif + drool.gif effect...but getting them to watch pirated dvds...hrrmm..that guy must be filthy rich but dunno how to appreciate what he's got...

as usual bro anfield, you always comes up with real sensible explanations...i really tabik you notworthy.gif notworthy.gif notworthy.gif

they are probably releasing less ideal displays to fend off LCD competitions...creating consumer awareness of plasma & letting them know plasma tv's are just as affordable as LCDs with their entry level plasma TVs....as well as keep stating plasma is a better display compared to LCD, which i totally agree....


low98944
post Jan 13 2010, 04:09 PM

...oooOOOooo...
*******
Senior Member
5,533 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Area 51
Little info about Panasonic VT25 from CNet:

We asked Panasonic's rep whether the the new TVs, like the current V10 series, would include a 96Hz refresh rate, to better display native 1080p/24 content. We were told that the VT25 would have a 96Hz option, but that the new G25 and G20 models would have the same flicker-prone 48Hz refresh rate option found on the current G10 models. See the review of the Panasonic TC-PG10 series for details.
TSReneeRay
post Jan 14 2010, 09:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
56 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
Millions thank to all...
Very2 good input.....



Regards


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0573sec    0.77    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 09:08 AM