Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 What is the purpose of PhD School?

views
     
annariana
post Jan 8 2010, 07:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
197 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
From: Berkeley, JB, Akita, Dublin, home~



ok this thread sounds more like /k to me, not the usual phd stuff.

to answer the question, i think of phd school is a spinoff of RWI, where philosophic and scientific topics are discussed factually, with lesser emotional tenacity.

and i think phd school doesnt need a specific mod, its not active enough. only few are active in this section, so talking in sociological eyes - why bother assigning a specific mod? there are not enough criminals to assign national head police to this area, rhetorically.

what we need is to have more forumers to be active in phd, and more exciting topics for us to discuss. when we have that, lets have an election to choose our own phd moderator. LOL.
arthurlwf
post Jan 8 2010, 09:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(annariana @ Jan 8 2010, 07:40 PM)
ok this thread sounds more like /k to me, not the usual phd stuff.

to answer the question, i think of phd school is a spinoff of RWI, where philosophic and scientific topics are discussed factually, with lesser emotional tenacity.

and i think phd school doesnt need a specific mod, its not active enough. only few are active in this section, so talking in sociological eyes - why bother assigning a specific mod? there are not enough criminals to assign national head police to this area, rhetorically.

what we need is to have more forumers to be active in phd, and more exciting topics for us to discuss. when we have that, lets have an election to choose our own phd moderator. LOL.
*
2nd your opinion
azarimy
post Jan 10 2010, 01:49 AM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(annariana @ Jan 8 2010, 11:40 AM)
ok this thread sounds more like /k to me, not the usual phd stuff.

to answer the question, i think of phd school is a spinoff of RWI, where philosophic and scientific topics are discussed factually, with lesser emotional tenacity.

and i think phd school doesnt need a specific mod, its not active enough. only few are active in this section, so talking in sociological eyes - why bother assigning a specific mod? there are not enough criminals to assign national head police to this area, rhetorically.


i agree. PhD school is basically where serious discussions that doesnt necessarily equate to real world issues. mostly revolves around science or pseudo-science.

QUOTE
what we need is to have more forumers to be active in phd, and more exciting topics for us to discuss. when we have that, lets have an election to choose our own phd moderator. LOL.
*
this, i dont agree. not all PhDs produce exciting topics. trust me biggrin.gif.
empire23
post Jan 20 2010, 12:07 PM

Team Island Hopper
Group Icon
Staff
9,417 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bladin Point, Northern Territory
teh purpose of this subforum is to allow forumers pursuing a doctorate to school themselves in the art of getting one. the end
SUSf4tE
post Jan 21 2010, 09:34 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,605 posts

Joined: Nov 2008

i was excited when this forum was created but soon realize its just a scientific spam forum..

threads like armageddon, ghosts,etc are just threads to discuss childish fantasy...
ZeratoS
post Jan 21 2010, 11:35 AM

Oh you.
******
Senior Member
1,044 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: 127.0.0.1


QUOTE(annariana @ Jan 8 2010, 07:40 PM)
what we need is to have more forumers to be active in phd, and more exciting topics for us to discuss. when we have that, lets have an election to choose our own phd moderator. LOL.
*
Dar'lin, not everybody can come up with thought-provoking topics to discuss, and a vast majority of the forumers are rather lacking in the uhh..nevermind. Anyway, its great that this forum isn't too particularly visited because it gives for more organized discussions without having to sift through many pages of unwanted nonsense.


I don't really think we need a moderator, things are fine as they are. Just have someone check in occasionally to delete the threads of non-relevance and ones which are rather vague, as Lynn highlighted : the "What-if" threads.
Polaris
post Jan 31 2010, 03:02 PM

Trust Fund Baby
*******
Senior Member
2,850 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Stellar Nursery
A mental gym?


empirekhoo
post Feb 1 2010, 12:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
218 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: 1001010100010011101
QUOTE(f4tE @ Jan 21 2010, 09:34 AM)
i was excited when this forum was created but soon realize its just a scientific spam forum..

threads like armageddon, ghosts,etc are just threads to discuss childish fantasy...
*
+1

I wonder why people have the tendency to think they're able to break second law of thermodynamics, or conservation laws. Wake up. we can extend a law, but not completely break it.
faceless
post Apr 8 2010, 11:02 AM

Straight Mouth is Big Word
*******
Senior Member
4,515 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
When looking at this “Round Table Discussion - PhD School” I thought it just a fancy name for the forum. More than half the topics here are not PhD materials. Some of the posts are just smarty ass comments. I thought this a place to put up interesting ideas or topics you needed help with to get some educated comments. For this reason we need moderators. Their task would be keeping people in the agenda and deleting out irrelevant post. Someone with this authority would come under critique every now and then. Their credentials and ability will be questioned. I don’t think voting a mod would work out either. They may be good for a while but not all the time. I have yet to meet an omniscient person. LYN should set up rules on handling grievance of the nature.
guestaccount
post Apr 8 2010, 01:35 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
4 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
QUOTE(convivencia @ Dec 31 2009, 01:29 PM)
I have watched perfectly healthy threads been closed by moderators for really really ridiculous reasons.

I still remember there was one thread, it started talking about science, but the conversation drifted a bit towards philosophy.

No matter it was about science or about philosophy, the conversations were still on topic.

Then a mod shut the thread down, citing that it was a science thread and now it had become philosophical.

How ridiculous can that be?

Just because of a tag (science) the conversation isn't allowed to drift into philosophy?

How qualified is that moderator in the first place to know if philosophy isn't related to science, or vice versa?

If this PhD section supposed to be for forumers to discuss high-level ideas, how come moderators who can't understand anything are taking charge over here?

At the very least please send moderators who can comprehend higher level of thinking to take charge of the PhD section.
*
Yes, I fully agree.
powerfulcool
post Apr 8 2010, 05:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
179 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
the probationary-Moderators moderating the threads here are of low standards. they are more "popular" than they are knowledgeable. when they are confronted with a problem they could not handle, they do the only thing they know how to do - closing or hiding the threads.

in my opinion, these "probationary Moderators" who has little to no regard of moderate usage of power should not be allowed to be full moderators.

Otherwise they would turn out to be junk moderators.
Geminist
post Apr 8 2010, 07:42 PM

- ドSな彼女 -
Group Icon
VIP
2,928 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
It is easy to sit in one corner and whinge, we can all do that. If you are unhappy with a moderator's action, take it to the front desk, take it to the staff or the admin.

Have you or anyone here actually suggested something useful to the administrator or to make the forum a better, more open place?


m1ck3y3mon
post Apr 8 2010, 10:48 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
25 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
who care?probably no ppl care.....

This post has been edited by m1ck3y3mon: Apr 8 2010, 10:49 PM
teongpeng
post Apr 8 2010, 11:29 PM

Justified and Ancient
*******
Senior Member
2,003 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


QUOTE(Geminist @ Apr 8 2010, 07:42 PM)
Have you or anyone here actually suggested something useful to the administrator or to make the forum a better, more open place?
*

i thought the problem has already been stated clearly and the solution been given.

problem : mods who cant differentiate between whats spam and whats a good argument

Solution: get better mods.

ta daa. just like that.

Geminist
post Apr 9 2010, 01:06 AM

- ドSな彼女 -
Group Icon
VIP
2,928 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(teongpeng @ Apr 8 2010, 03:29 PM)
i thought the problem has already been stated clearly and the solution been given.

problem : mods who cant differentiate between whats spam and whats a good argument

Solution: get better mods.

ta daa. just like that.
*
Problem: Leaders around the world who can't lead properly.
Solution: Get better leaders.

There you go. Problem solved and the world is now a better place.

I hope the above demonstrates my point. It is very easy to talk, but has people actually tried taking the first step to get the ball rolling? Can people suggest to the admin or at the front desk a good candidate? If the team know of one, we would have appointed the person by now so involvement by the community is essential.

m1ck3y3mon
post Apr 9 2010, 01:23 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
25 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(Geminist @ Apr 9 2010, 01:06 AM)
Problem: Leaders around the world who can't lead properly.
Solution: Get better leaders.

There you go.  Problem solved and the world is now a better place. 

I hope the above demonstrates my point.  It is very easy to talk, but has people actually tried taking the first step to get the ball rolling?  Can people suggest to the admin or at the front desk a good candidate?  If the team know of one, we would have appointed the person by now so involvement by the community is essential.
*
you can search for,find,look for,hired,get or if that is not possible
they can learn from great leader,leaderships book,or articles about leadership,obama of coz he is a great leader
world changed alot since he has become usa president.
yes talking is more easy
doing something always is so difficult
but leader should be a person who is willing to act and get something done
it is their job not our job.it is not our business
same goes to the one who hold responsibility
anyway
i have got an idea.if we are going to take this more seriously
then i suggest you better hire me as a staff

This post has been edited by m1ck3y3mon: Apr 9 2010, 01:44 AM
teongpeng
post Apr 9 2010, 07:57 AM

Justified and Ancient
*******
Senior Member
2,003 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


QUOTE(Geminist @ Apr 9 2010, 01:06 AM)
Problem: Leaders around the world who can't lead properly.
Solution: Get better leaders.

There you go.  Problem solved and the world is now a better place. 
problems solved only when actions are taken. sleep.gif

Joey Christensen
post Apr 9 2010, 09:37 AM

Purgamentum init, exit purgamentum
*******
Senior Member
3,651 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Fort Canning Garden Status: Dog Fighting



I had my fair share of contributing and creating a few threads here in PhD section when it first materialised for us. However, as time goes by, it has become on a downslope trend in the quality of PhD.

The very last of my contribution came in a thread discussing about Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) whereby one can understand the concepts of his or her personality type and cognitive style. To be honest, if fellow forummer "dreamer101" were not posting there and brought the sense of seriousness and sensibility in posting, I wouldn't even bother to post in the beginning.

We need not Moderator(s) to keep things in tabs here in PhD section. All we need is some sense and sensibility in posting from everyone that wishes to participate in this said section.

Regards, Joey

This post has been edited by Joey Christensen: Apr 9 2010, 09:38 AM
vivienne85
post Apr 11 2010, 01:58 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
360 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: land of Starlight


QUOTE(Joey Christensen @ Apr 9 2010, 09:37 AM)
I had my fair share of contributing and creating a few threads here in PhD section when it first materialised for us. However, as time goes by, it has become on a downslope trend in the quality of PhD.

The very last of my contribution came in a thread discussing about Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) whereby one can understand the concepts of his or her personality type and cognitive style. To be honest, if fellow forummer "dreamer101" were not posting there and brought the sense of seriousness and sensibility in posting, I wouldn't even bother to post in the beginning.

We need not Moderator(s) to keep things in tabs here in PhD section. All we need is some sense and sensibility in posting from everyone that wishes to participate in this said section.

Regards, Joey
*
+1

instead of just asking a question, TS(s) should post more information/comments with regard to the topic which will prompt more ppl to contribute their thoughts and ideas.

This post has been edited by vivienne85: Apr 11 2010, 02:00 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0190sec    0.30    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 12:54 AM