QUOTE(JoBigShow @ Dec 11 2009, 03:50 AM)
Interesting, so in terms of achieving performance, I am to orientate my efforts all on getting the lowest PL value?
And the timing and clocks are just the means/'tools' to get me to tweak ever closer to the lowest value of PL possible right?
usually 4:5 or 3:4 or 5:6 can achieve lower PL, so even at looser timing, it still perform better..
This is really interesting... I have my FSB set at 400, Strapped at 333, I can achieve 1:1.2 by increasing my DD2 from 800mhz to 961mhz.
Can someone clarify me this, is 1:1.2 technically 5:6? Mathematically 5:6 is 1:1.2( 5/5 = 1 : 6/5 = 1.2) but probably a totally different thing in computing i guess...
What other means I can attain stability in getting the lowest value of PL?
FYI, ATM I set my PL @ 10. I'm using Asus P5Q Turbo btw, Any suggestion that I can get lower PL?
Ai Clock Twister?,etc.
5:6=1.2xAnd the timing and clocks are just the means/'tools' to get me to tweak ever closer to the lowest value of PL possible right?
usually 4:5 or 3:4 or 5:6 can achieve lower PL, so even at looser timing, it still perform better..
This is really interesting... I have my FSB set at 400, Strapped at 333, I can achieve 1:1.2 by increasing my DD2 from 800mhz to 961mhz.
Can someone clarify me this, is 1:1.2 technically 5:6? Mathematically 5:6 is 1:1.2( 5/5 = 1 : 6/5 = 1.2) but probably a totally different thing in computing i guess...
What other means I can attain stability in getting the lowest value of PL?
FYI, ATM I set my PL @ 10. I'm using Asus P5Q Turbo btw, Any suggestion that I can get lower PL?
Ai Clock Twister?,etc.
4:5=1.25x
2:3=1.5X
1:2=2x
That the ram divider and the speed of the ram to FSB
For lower PL,you need a good ram,right amount of vmch
BTW read anandtech.com rampage formula review,they go deep into this subject
Dec 12 2009, 01:05 AM
Quote
0.0165sec
0.22
7 queries
GZIP Disabled