Try some other really high-bitrate movies. I'm curious to know if it's indeed a bitrate/bottleneck problem or it's specific to encoding settings I used.

http://www.tek-9.org/cinema/Trapped_Inside-261.html This one would do.

FWIW it plays perfectly for me on media player classic with coreavc decoder.

http://www.tek-9.org/cinema/beware_of_sharks-450.html

WOO IM FAMUS

FAMUS LIKE TEH JEBUS!

Falk ISH famus!

This post has been edited by b l i s s: Dec 12 2009, 05:39 PM

WOOO! Famus! Letz sehlebrait his fame with some vawdka!

youtube > me

Gonna try copying the 54GB uncompressed to a mac and exporting with quicktime to mov and uploading that. If youtube wants to be shit it deserves an upload in a shit format.

lolwut? That'll take forever considering that none of us have upload speed of that even comes close to 1 meg.

The uncompressed complete movie is is 54gb since reso x fps x length in secs x bit depth is 1280*720*50*((6*60)+47)*3 = 56263680000.

Obviously the .mov export will be smaller (~400mb as well) and if I'm not wrong Youtube 'HD' (lol) runs at approx 2500kbps, or 10min movie = approx. 200mb

---

Added on December 13, 2009, 4:05 pmPRAISE JESUS IT WORKS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OlYVyspIXs

This post has been edited by Falk: Dec 13 2009, 04:07 PM

Slick editing you have there dude!

Really good for testing connection stability lol If you can play this through w/o buffering you have a good connection


This post has been edited by wodenus: Dec 16 2009, 01:40 PM

How so? This Youtube HD stream is ~2500kbps. Other Youtube HD streams are also ~2500kbps. (Because Youtube HD isn't actually all that HD)

Grats on placebo effect!

2500 kbps = 2.5 Mbps. If you have a constant, stable, low-latency, zero-packet loss 2.5Mbps connection, you're pretty good as far as local broadband is concerned

Incidentally, where are you and how much does your 2.5 Mbps connection cost?

This post has been edited by wodenus: Dec 17 2009, 01:50 PM

No, I'm asking, how is that different to Youtube HD vids in general?

what vid editing tools that you use falk?

This post has been edited by azrink: Dec 17 2009, 07:45 PM

In the readme, download if you want to find out.

HEHEHEH

use Media Player Classic with KLM Codecs.

Works fine for me. XP has this stupid 99% system idle process bug or whatever that makes videos run shit on the normal media player. U could have a ram bottle neck too i guess?

thanks dear. since i m into video editing too (mostly racing games, rfactor), i really dig you skills mate. nice job....

---

Added on December 19, 2009, 1:39 pmadobe premier not that hard to learn.... but after effects? now thats a different things. i'm still blur using it. ur after effect skill are marveloues falk. i envy you...heheheheheh


This post has been edited by azrink: Dec 19 2009, 01:39 PM

I learnt everything on the fly. And I refuse to touch Premiere ever again just because of the acrobatics I had to do to get my 200fps footage downsampled to 50fps project the way I wanted (i.e. not a blurry mess that Premiere insists on producing)

I basically just made it a point to watch 1-2 tutorial vids a day. Plus a load of common sense, I guess.