underexposed and doesnt seems to be in focused..
hope ya dont mind

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Dec 28 2009, 04:21 PM

hahah same here...but some third party lens are great:)

di622 ~RM450 and SB600 ~RM800
di622 is really powerful and comes with a bounc card (you can use a business card and it should work too~)
however, the only thing i don't like about it is the annoying non-stop beeping noise and the e-ttl isn't very accurate..

having a sb600 enables you to play with nikon CLS!

what did u do to the pics???
if i were to edit it:

u will need to use ur pop up flash to optical trigger di622. Which means, di622 has to be on Manual mode (TTL disabled)

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Dec 30 2009, 10:35 AM

huh can TTL kar?....

ooh one more thing, nissin di622 doesnt support high-speed sync..

nop...no exp on that
hmm forgot how it works, but i rmb the wireless works for manual only...haha nvrm la..afterall my nissin ttl also screwed up one.

i will go for 12-24 for better range...

IINM, it is the refresh rate, nothing to do with ur lcd..its normal

it is like where monitors/tv tends to flicker in tv shows too...its the difference between frequency...

overcooked?

most shops do charge 2% for CC payment and 5% for installment

ooh sigma 18-250 HSM OS?

---

Added on January 4, 2010, 9:18 ami would say go for lens with D.

AF-D quoted from:http://www.nikonians.org/nikon/slr-lens.html
"Introduced in 1992. AF Nikon lenses with a CPU that also relays distance information to the camera, most useful for ultra-precise TTL flash. Among the first were the 35-70mm f/2.8D AF and 80-200mm f/2.8D ED AF Nikkor."

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Jan 4 2010, 09:18 AM

sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 HSM OS?
it is a new lens and I believe that it is in KL adi..
i used the older 17-70 2.8-4.5 before that the best thing about the lens is the sharpness and the MFD (20cm throughout all focal length)

why VR2? for the zoom lock? both are using VR version 2 also.....
the only reasons that i can think of
1) want longer range
2) want better built
3) want better VR (18-105 running on VR 1)

downside of 18-200
1) price
2) weight
3) size)
4) distortion (normal for zoom lens )

honestly, i find both image quality are pretty decent.....and yes the VR on 18-200 is pretty good, i can shoot 200mm at 1/10 with some practice...ahaha
erh...u shud see ur viewfinder stabilize (like playing as a sniper in games)...else, listen for that VR sound..

zoom to the max and watch ur VR comes into ur VF!

u will see it stabilize/vibrate(slight) thru ur VF.

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Jan 4 2010, 10:56 PM

high pitch?hmm....luckily mine dont have
can u?

i prefer 10-20 for the range...why not tokina 12-24?

nikon 18-105 has that sound during AF...some 'wheeling' sound....

---

Added on January 5, 2010, 9:42 amu suspect ur VR died???

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Jan 5 2010, 09:42 AM

my vr only has some 'tak tak' noise when its engaged..AF-S pretty quiet ...

see VR in action:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqVA3xa8TjI

AF-S sound:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dQf_dBVI7U
if u listen carefully, u should hear a soft 'click' before the AF-S sound...the click should be VR

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Jan 5 2010, 11:26 AM

why not get something like cokin/tianya ?