Im currently using the B+W UV , havent really tested it out , but reading from the reviews , its just plain awesome =)
NO vignette at all for my cal 1680 =)

Thought of getting CPL in the near future, would consider either Hoya HD , or the B+W CPL . There are two types of CPL in B+W though.. haha.
If can just go for the CPL Kaesemann.. LOL

You afford to own 16-80z but cant whack rm100-200 filter ? 

0168257061: Some shop I know sells loads of Carl Zeiss T* MC protector filters to Nikon and Canon users. I have Zeiss, Hoya Pro1D and B+W filters and I can tell you that the Zeiss filters are every bit just as good, minus the scratch-proof claim that the B+W and Hoya HD filters have.

Soony: The Sigma 30mm F1.4 is sharp.

I know!! I was there on Fri, but the crowd was thinner then.... will upload my pics into yr thread, if u dont mind...

Where's the 4 wireless strobe pic?? In Ahmike's cam??

neo, how far the distance from u to subject for the last few picture?

no la, i observed those sharp picture need to be shoot at very close distance. so nextime i also need to stand very front, kick out other photographer ass 

hmm, still no sign of pic from mike's camera..
bt from neo_lam pic, seem tat CZ lense is a good invest...:3

noobie question..
what angle of flash u use in these photo,
is it 75-45 with white card/stofen?

1680z vs 16105 anyone?

if 16105+anti glare filter can save a lot of money lo?

the zeiss logo really cost a lot...

---

Added on December 7, 2009, 11:27 pm

ya...but i said there is anti-glare filter also

totally got wads the meaning....other than the coating? is there any other diff thats better vs 16105?