QUOTE(terencey @ Nov 26 2006, 11:53 AM)
I was torned between these 2 sets as well last month. I got Samsung LA32R71B instead becoz of price. I paid RM4180 (cash). You might wanna bargain more if you going for samsung. I'm very satisfied with the performance of it. I hook up my HTPC to watch downloaded TV shows, play Xbox360 and watch Astro. HTPC and astro is a blast but Astro not that nice, need to sit at sofa distance to not notice some pixelations.
Can't comment much on sharp but it has all the good ingredients to handle wad you need (6ms or 8ms response time, 1200:1 contrast).
You might wanna check out another version of this model where its speaker is at the bottom instead of the side. Its cheaper than the side speaker version. Can be an option if you already have a home theater system.
Don't think you will see much difference on any TV smaller than 40". If I'm not wrong the games are not render in 1080p resolutions as well.
You play Xbox360 at what display? 720p? Do you notice any lag or shadowing effects during fast-paced actions when gaming? Pixelations on astro is a real letdown. Does anyone know it happens to Sharp Aquos as well?
QUOTE(psp _BOY @ Nov 26 2006, 12:27 PM)
If I were you I'd take the Aquos. Although the samsung has a higher [Dynamic] contrast, the Aquos isn't far back. Twin HDMI inputs is a plus. A higher response time for your gaming is good. Samung's DNIe sometimes lag games, well, yeah sometimes.
I'd take the Aquos, but it's your choice.
Ye' Know
Samsung has twin HDMI too. High response time is good?? I thought it's the other way round?

Samsung DNIe is really that bad? Can it be switched off or something?
I know Sharp is the world's best LCD manufacturer but I still need more reasons for me to choose Sharp over Samsung. Price is not a factor to seperate these two now.
Please all experts, convince me. Tomorrow I am taking leave to buy LCD