Okay, straight to the point.

Warning: Kinda long question.

Question: If a guy started a virgin and throughout the course of his lifetime and sleeps with a hundred girls that are virgins. Will he never get STDS?(any type)


This includes the following:
The guy and the hundred girl virgins never had:
STDS through birth/genetics
STDS through blood transfusions
STDS through saliva/toilet seat
Never kissed anybody
Never rubbed private parts with opposite sex
Never had oral sex
Never had anal sex
And also for hypothetical means, everyone in this question is a virgin when they say they are.

I ask this question because it was something a friend of mine asked me and of course when I asked people they always gave an off tangent answer such as-you can if the mother is HIV positive OR you can if she lies to you about her virginity. For the purpose of non redundant answers-all the virgins are truly virgins and they have never( see the above list ).

I know this is Lowyat,but please serious answers only okay? Thanks

Sorry if I may appear rude in the following post but please DO NOT:
1)Why you want to find virginsss izzit? tat's y ask this question!
2)tldr
3)Name me some other way they could have gotten STDs as virgins having sex(sharing milo peng with Jenna Jameson)
4)Debate on how oral sex does not cause STDS.
5)Tell me the impossibility of this question. This is a hypothetical question. I ask it because most people will say yes if I ask about a couple that are virgins but once I add the numbers( sleeping with hundred girls) they seem to think...ALOT. So I just want to ask and clarify.
6)Tell me that I just want a yes answer with all the possibilities of stds cut out. Yes I do want to clarify but not necessarily want a YES answer. The REASON why I cut out all the other probabilities is because they always give me those probabilities.

So either agree and say YES

or No. State your reason-why a virgin guy sleeping with hundred virgin girls that never had-see the list above-could get STDS.

Thanks!

if u lots were in heaven, yes.
some stds r bacterial and bacteria r everywhere.
go learn more about std.

You can still get it from poor hygiene.

There's a fantastic resource in which, with just a little effort, you can find out everything you need to know about the subject.

It's called "the internet".

hello? so LYN forum is not "the internet" ???

helloooo?? hellooo? heellloo?

gosh....

Believe everything from "the internet "cause it is so informative and so real !

Unker google never lies!

lulz ,uncle googler didn't lulz us

i think you would already be killed when you reached the third....(victim's family, friends)

You'd rather ask a bunch of strangers on a forum than do your own goddamn research?

---

Added on November 8, 2009, 6:07 pm*whoosh*





This post has been edited by n00b13: Nov 8 2009, 06:07 PM

Tried it and no,I did not find everything I needed to know about the subject. Half of them were clueless, a quarter did not know what an STD was and the other quarter from ezine articles and other forums gave me off tangent answers-the all famous," you never know dude,she could be lying"/

true

So I guess the answer is yes to my question. Thanks guys.

So you can close your thread now.

still can get STD

the proof is here : http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=1010774

"Everybody lies." - House MD
"I don't ask why patients lie, I just assume they all do." - House MD
"It's a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what." - House MD

Virgin lies. lol

As far as I know, he wouldn't.

But why do you ask?

---

Added on November 8, 2009, 9:34 pmAs for hygiene, even the STD version of thrush (yeast infection) needs to be especially virulent/energetic to be transmitted to the guy. Also, does UTI count as STD? U know when you pork her too much and she got an infection in her bladder?


Anyway, I don't see what's the fuss about for this question.

It's probably a sign of how far people rely on simplistic memes to be "educated" than what they truly understand.

Transmission of STDs relies heavily on sexual behaviors within sexual networks. It's not as simple as "pork a guy or girl with std, then u get it, hu hu hu".

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Nov 8 2009, 09:34 PM

If you count UTI as an STD, then yes, he might get it because UTI is most likely due to hygiene and other factors i.e. holding in urine too long, not drinking enuf water, wearing too tight undies, etc.
But guys are less prone to UTI anyways. And the infection doesn't go to the bladder straight away la.

I'm not a doctor but now let us examine the plausibility of getting herpes like was alleged in this thread:

http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1010774

For starters, whether the TS is a troll or dupe DOES matter. Trolls and dupes are known to create highly contrived and convoluted dramas just to rickroll people.

Secondly... getting genital herpes from a few droplets that splashed against her from the ground?

In order to be infected, a person needs to be exposed to a sufficient size of viral load, and that viral load also has to survive and pass through channels such as breaks in skin or the mucous membranes.

Droplets from the ground.... JUST DOESN'T HAPPEN.

In order for that to happen a whole bunch of infected individuals would have to spill gallons of infected body fluids and soak the ground!

As for the herpes spreading to other parts of her body from an initially infected site... again, not likely as after the first infection she would have some immunity to the virus and it would be contained to the site of first infection.

As for spreading from her boyfriend, if it was from oral sex, he would have visible sores on his mouth a few days before or after.

It could be from towels but that would have to be from USED towels. You get the idea.

Whether the outbreak is HSV 1 or 2 is of high importance and significance. In order to be exposed to STDs you must be somehow exposed to a sexual network that has them or is vulnerable to them.

I LOL'ed at all those fools in that thread saying the doctor has "bad judgement" for thinking they're just another couple that sleeps around. There is such a thing as patient-doctor confidentiality, but even then there's a limit a doctor will go to just to LIE for the patient.

BOTTOM LINE.

Two possibilities.

The thread starter is the perfect waterfish for whom the image of his angelic girlfriend cannot be shattered and she DID get herpes by moonlighting for extra income or some fling a week prior to her outbreak and the doctor knows this but cannot tell the boyfriend due to patient doctor confidentiality.

Or the threadstarter is a troll or dupe out to craft a morality tale for weak minded sheeple.

cancel read wrong

This post has been edited by Frostymocha: Nov 8 2009, 10:11 PM

No, I DO mean HE.

If it spread from HIM from oral sex, i.e from his mouth to her pu.ssy, he would have an outbreak of sores either before or after the transmission and act of oral sex.

The virus starts shedding possibly up to five (or is it 3) days before the sores develop. But apart from that you don't just casually shed the virus. You have to be under enough stress to weaken your immune system.

And again, this is important because a sufficient amount of live virus has to be shed and transmitted to her. Casual transmission is just not possible. HSV is not known to be transmitted in such a manner.

---

Added on November 8, 2009, 10:13 pmAnyhow, I revise my opinion on that thread in health and fitness.

My conclusion:

The thread starter is a troll or dupe who painstakingly crafted a morality tale in order to influence people.

He writes too carefully and diplomatically. Explains too much.

And passes us implausible, CONTRA-FACTUAL evidence as facts.

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Nov 8 2009, 10:13 PM